Cargill Locks Out 1,700 Workers at Fort Morgan Beef Plant After Contract Rejection
Labor dispute at a major Colorado processing facility adds new pressure to an already strained U.S. beef supply chain
More than 1,700 Teamsters at Cargill Meat Solutions were locked out this morning after months of fighting for a new collective bargaining agreement.
Workers at the Cargill facility are critical to processing millions of pounds of beef for American families nationwide. In a town as small and tight knit as Fort Morgan, Cargill Teamsters keep the economy running.
What Happened
Cargill has refused to offer Teamsters Local 455 members what the union calls necessary improvements to wages, healthcare, and safety protections. The company, for its part, has framed the standoff differently — citing “continued uncertainty” as its reason for the lockout and characterizing its $33.4 million contract offer as fair and competitive.
The union is pushing back hard. “Shame on this company for shutting out our members. Cargill can afford to give these workers a fair deal that reflects their hard work and dedication,” said Dean Modecker, Secretary-Treasurer of Teamsters Local 455. “This was a disgraceful move by a company that has long taken its workers for granted.”
Workers on the ground expressed similar frustration. “I’ve been at Cargill for 33 years and it’s really upsetting to see the company be so unreasonable,” said Chris Bell, a maintenance worker and Local 455 member. “I am just a few months away from retirement, but I want to be out here supporting the younger workers who are fighting for their future.”
A Long-Running Dispute
This lockout did not come out of nowhere. Labor tensions had been escalating at the Fort Morgan plant for weeks, with unconfirmed reports of wildcat strike activity underscoring growing worker frustration over wages and working conditions as Local 455 entered a critical phase of contract negotiations.
Prior to today’s lockout, some analysts and outlets had already reported on strike activity at the plant, though those reports were unconfirmed by Cargill, which acknowledged only that workers were in contract negotiations. Analysts also noted that with ample shackle space across the industry, the market had not been seriously rattled by the earlier strike rumors.
This is also not the first labor flashpoint at Fort Morgan. A similar dynamic played out in 2016 when, in an earlier contract dispute, 98 percent of the 1,700 union workers rejected a Cargill proposal that they said offered inadequate wage increases while drastically cutting healthcare benefits and raising costs. That dispute was eventually resolved through federal mediation — an outcome that may again be relevant here.
Market and Supply Chain Implications
The timing is particularly sensitive. The Fort Morgan facility is one of the larger beef processing plants in the western U.S., and it sits inside a broader market already under stress:
- Tight cattle supplies. U.S. beef prices are hovering near record highs and the nation’s cattle herd is at its lowest level in decades. Any reduction in slaughter capacity aggravates an already undersupplied market.
- New World Screwworm uncertainty. The cattle sector has simultaneously been dealing with disruptions to Mexican cattle imports tied to screwworm concerns, adding another layer of supply-chain risk.
- Packer margin pressure. High live cattle costs have already been squeezing packer margins, and a prolonged work stoppage would further complicate procurement and scheduling across Cargill’s beef network.
For now, analysts suggest the near-term impact may be containable if the lockout is brief. The existence of excess slaughter capacity elsewhere in the industry provides some buffer. But a prolonged dispute could meaningfully tighten boxed beef supplies and push already-elevated prices higher.
Cargill’s Broader Context at Fort Morgan
The lockout arrives despite — or perhaps partly because of — significant recent investment by Cargill at the plant. In June 2025, Cargill announced a nearly $90 million investment in automation and new technologies at Fort Morgan under its “Factory of the Future” initiative, aimed at improving efficiency, yield, and worker safety. The broader commitment also included a $40 million housing initiative, with an 81-unit apartment complex and 27 townhomes built for employees to address Fort Morgan’s housing shortage.
Workers and union officials may see that capital investment as evidence that Cargill has the financial capacity to offer better contract terms — a tension that likely sharpened the adversarial tone of this week’s events.
What to Watch
The key question now is how long the lockout lasts. If Cargill and Local 455 return to the table quickly — potentially with federal mediation, as occurred in 2016 — market disruption should remain limited. A prolonged standoff, however, would remove roughly 4,000–4,700 head of daily slaughter capacity from the western U.S. at a moment when the beef market has very little slack to absorb it.

