Ag Intel

China Purchase Commitments Raise Bigger Questions for Grain Markets

China Purchase Commitments Raise Bigger Questions for Grain Markets

USDA advances disaster, specialty crop aid rules to OMB review

LINKS 

Link: Some Say China Soybean Purchases Could Account for Bulk of
         Proposed U.S. Farm Trade Target… But…
Link: Some Skepticism Emerges Over New U.S./China Farm Purchase
         Commitments
Link: U.S., China Outline New Agricultural Purchase Framework

Link: The Week Ahead, May 17: Congress Faces Iran War Debate,
         Transportation Deadline, and Key Primaries

Link: Weekend Updates, May 16:

Link: Video: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, May 16
Link: Audio: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, May 16

Updates: Policy/News/Markets, May 18, 2026
UP FRONT


TOP STORIES

— U.S./China summit produces new agricultural trade commitments: White House and Beijing signal progress on farm purchases, tariffs and market access, including a proposed $17 billion annual ag purchase framework and expanded U.S. beef and poultry access to China.

— Greer defends China trade framework, signals more tariff tools remain on table: USTR Jamieson Greer says China is already easing agricultural barriers while the administration formalizes new U.S./China “Board of Trade” and “Board of Investment” structures.

— Greer: Trump/Xi did not discuss tariffs directly: Greer says tariff negotiations are being handled by working-level officials while Trump and Xi focused on broader strategic and economic issues.

— Analysis: China purchase commitments raise bigger questions for grain markets: Traders debate whether China’s proposed purchases would create truly new demand for U.S. agriculture or simply redirect global trade flows.

— Putin heads to Beijing after Trump/Xi summit: Russian President Vladimir Putin travels to China this week as Beijing balances closer ties with Moscow alongside renewed engagement with Washington.

— Trump warns Iran as UAE nuclear plant hit by drones: Escalating Gulf tensions push oil prices above $110 and deepen concerns over disruptions to Strait of Hormuz energy flows.

FINANCIAL MARKETS

— Equities today: U.S. equity futures remain under pressure as investors monitor Iran tensions, weaker Chinese economic data and rising risks of renewed military escalation.

— Bond market rout pressures Fed as inflation fears intensify: ING’s Chris Turner says surging Treasury yields and persistent inflation are increasing pressure on the Federal Reserve to sound more hawkish.

AGRIBUSINESS

— Deere faces new right-to-repair lawsuit from landscaping contractor: New Illinois antitrust complaint expands Deere’s repair-policy battle beyond agriculture into construction and landscaping equipment.

AG MARKETS

— Grains start Monday firmer as trade hopes, crop progress and weather drive focus: Corn, soybeans and wheat move higher overnight as traders weigh China trade optimism, weather risks and USDA crop updates.
Global grain markets firm as weather threats and trade optimism support prices: International grain prices strengthened May 18 as traders weighed adverse weather in key producing regions, improving prospects for U.S./China agricultural trade and continued competitiveness of U.S. exports in global markets.

— China’s new U.S. farm purchase commitments could reshape global trade flows: Reuters analysis says larger Chinese imports of U.S. commodities may redirect demand away from Brazil and other exporters.

FARM POLICY

USDA advances disaster, specialty crop aid rules to OMB review: Industry awaits details on specialty crop assistance and Supplemental Disaster Relief Program implementation as regulatory review begins.

FERTILIZER

— Petrobras pushes to rebuild Brazil’s fertilizer capacity: Brazil aims to reduce dependence on imported fertilizer as Petrobras restarts nitrogen production facilities and expands domestic output.

NEW WORLD SCREWWORM

— USDA targets screwworm threat with data-driven sterile fly strategy: APHIS officials say limited sterile fly supplies are being strategically deployed across Mexico and Texas to contain screwworm spread.

ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY

— Monday: Oil extends rally as Iran war risks escalate and Gulf energy infrastructure comes under threat: Drone attacks and stalled diplomacy heighten fears of broader Middle East supply disruptions.

— Looming energy crunch raises fears of prolonged global supply shock: Financial Times reports tightening oil inventories and refinery bottlenecks are worsening the global energy squeeze tied to the Iran war.

— Malacca Strait emerges as new geopolitical flashpoint: NBC News reports growing concerns that future U.S./China conflict could threaten another vital global shipping chokepoint.

TRADE POLICY

— EU scrambles for trade deal compromise ahead of Trump tariff deadline: European leaders race to finalize a politically sensitive trade arrangement before Trump’s July 4 tariff deadline.

CHINA

— China retail sales slump as Iran war fallout hits consumer spending: Weak vehicle and housing-related purchases highlight mounting pressure on China’s consumer economy.

PERSONNEL

— House Ag leaders urge Trump to fill CFTC vacancies: Bipartisan House Ag Committee leaders say the CFTC needs a full commission to manage market volatility and digital commodity oversight.

TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS

— Vance rail safety push faces GOP resistance: Wall Street Journal editorial argues proposed rail safety mandates would raise shipping costs without materially improving safety.

CONGRESS

— Congress returns with reconciliation, infrastructure and key primaries in focus: Senate Republicans prepare reconciliation votes and hearings while House leaders push infrastructure and budget legislation.

— House unveils $580 billion surface transportation reauthorization bill: New infrastructure package would renew highway and transit programs through 2031 while adding EV and hybrid user fees.

— Republicans eye third reconciliation push before August: Conservatives press GOP leadership for another reconciliation bill focused on defense, fraud and election-related measures.

POLITICS & ELECTIONS

— Trump’s Senate purge raises GOP risks: Wall Street Journal editorial warns Trump-backed primary fights could jeopardize Republican Senate control in 2026.

WEATHER

— NWS outlook: Multi-day severe weather and flash flood threat continues across the Midwest and Plains: National Weather Service warns of severe storms, flooding, wildfire danger and heavy mountain snow.

— Storms drench western Corn Belt while frost threatens Plains crops: Heavy rains slow planting while freeze risks emerge for parts of the central Plains and winter wheat areas.

— Brazil safrinha corn forecast diverges sharply between North and South: Northern Brazil remains hot and dry while southern growing areas receive rain but face short-term frost threats.

 TOP STORIESU.S./China summit produces new agricultural trade commitmentsWhite House and Beijing signal progress on purchases, tariffs, and market access — though key details still pending We worked the weekend to provide coverage (link) and perspective (link) and (link) on fast-breaking developments relative to ag markets and the Trump/Xi summit. And some of the information shows that the usual dose of some ag sector and trader naysaying and need for instant information seen last Friday when ag markets plunged on “lack of news” for the summit was premature.  The White House and China’s Ministry of Commerce are both signaling that President Donald Trump’s summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping produced meaningful progress on agricultural trade, tariff discussions, and market access issues — developments that could provide a significant boost for U.S. farm exports if fully implemented. According to a White House fact sheet (link), China agreed to purchase at least $17 billion annually in U.S. agricultural products during 2026 (prorated), 2027, and 2028, in addition to prior soybean purchase commitments made in late 2025. The agreement also includes the creation of a U.S./China Board of Trade and a Board of Investment aimed at managing bilateral trade and investment issues involving non-sensitive goods. The White House also highlighted China’s decision to restore access for more than 400 U.S. beef facilities and resume poultry imports from U.S. states recognized by USDA as free of highly pathogenic avian influenza. Those actions address longstanding concerns from U.S. livestock producers and exporters who had argued that China’s regulatory barriers had become increasingly restrictive. This portion of the U.S./China agreement clearly means additionality for U.S. beef exports. Meanwhile, China’s Ministry of Commerce confirmed that both countries reached “initial outcomes” in five key areas and agreed to continue implementing prior trade understandings while working toward additional tariff reductions and expanded trade flows. Of note: Chinese officials specifically referenced plans to discuss tariff reductions on products of mutual concern and said both sides would work to resolve non-tariff barriers involving agricultural trade. China also indicated the United States would work to address Beijing’s concerns over the detention of Chinese dairy and aquatic product shipments, while China pledged to advance solutions regarding U.S. beef plant registrations and poultry access. Importantly, Beijing’s acknowledgment that both countries are discussing mutual tariff reductions adds credibility to expectations that lower tariff levels could improve the competitiveness of U.S. agricultural exports into China. While tariff negotiations remain ongoing, any reductions could significantly improve the price position of U.S. soybeans, corn, pork, beef, and other commodities relative to competing suppliers such as Brazil and Argentina. Still, major questions remain about enforcement mechanisms, commodity allocations, and how purchase commitments will be verified. Skeptics continue to point to China’s failure to fully meet obligations under the Phase One trade agreement negotiated during Trump’s first term. Critics also note that some purchases could simply redirect existing global trade flows rather than generate entirely new demand for U.S. agriculture. Link to our special Sunday report on this topic. Meanwhile, supporters argue the dual confirmation from both Washington and Beijing marks a notable shift from the skepticism that initially surrounded Trump’s China visit. They contend that the restoration of beef plant approvals and poultry access demonstrates that concrete steps are already being implemented — even as negotiators continue working through the finer details. Greer defends China trade framework, signals more tariff tools remain on tableUSTR chief says Beijing already easing agricultural barriers as administration formalizes “Board of Trade” structure for U.S./China economic relations In a May 17 interview (link) on CBS News’ Face the Nation, U.S. Trade Representative(USTR) Jamieson Greer defended the Trump administration’s evolving trade framework with China, arguing the new “Board of Trade” and “Board of Investment” mechanisms would formalize economic relations between the two countries while preserving U.S. leverage on tariffs and national security restrictions. Greer also confirmed that China has begun easing some agricultural barriers, including reopening access for U.S. beef and poultry products, while emphasizing that additional tariff actions remain possible under ongoing Section 301-style investigations. Note: Link to our special report released Sunday that included details of what Greer said about the same topics on ABC News’ This WeekGreer framed the administration’s strategy as an effort to separate “non-sensitive” commercial trade from strategic technologies tied to national security concerns. “When we think about the Board of Trade, we’re thinking about how to manage economic relations between the U.S. and China,” Greer said. “These are two economies that are quite different, and we’re focused on trade in non-sensitive goods.” He said areas envisioned for expanded trade discussions include agricultural commodities, energy exports, aircraft sales, and medical products. “We’re looking to discuss things like sales of agricultural goods to China, energy goods, Boeings, medical devices,” Greer said. “When we talk about the kinds of things we want to be importing from China, there are a number of things, there can be consumer goods, maybe low-tech items.” Greer described the new bilateral structure as a departure from the “ad hoc” approach that has characterized U.S./China trade diplomacy for years. “We have never had a Board of Trade or a Board of Investment before,” he said. “We’ve always had an ad hoc approach with China and the United States, which I think is actually challenging. I think it’s more important to formalize these relations.” He also pointed to recent Chinese actions benefiting U.S. agriculture as evidence that the talks are already producing results. “We saw China over the past couple of days reduce a host of non-tariff barriers on agricultural products, such as beef and poultry,” Greer said. “We’ve seen them already starting to do things to facilitate imports from the United States.” On tariffs, Greer stressed that the administration still retains the option to raise duties again following the Supreme Court’s February ruling that partially constrained earlier tariff authorities. “The Chinese know … that the United States can elevate tariffs to the higher level that we had at the time of what we call the Busan deal in October,” Greer said. “The president is exploring different tools that he has.” Greer repeatedly declined to prejudge the outcome of ongoing trade investigations but strongly hinted the administration believes the probes will uncover evidence of unfair trade practices and industrial overcapacity. “If those investigations show what we think they might show, which is that there’s a huge problem with overcapacity in China and other countries, we’ll certainly be presenting the president with those options,” he said, referencing potential tariffs, quotas, and service-related fees. The interview also offered new details on agricultural purchase commitments tied to the recent Trump/Xi summit in Beijing. Greer confirmed that China remains committed to the October “Busan” soybean arrangement under which Beijing agreed to purchase 25 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans annually through the remainder of President Donald Trump’s term. “We’ve had a deal in place with the Chinese since October that they would buy 25 million metric tons of soybeans each year for the rest of the president’s administration,” Greer said. “That deal is still in force.” Greer said new agreements layered on top of the soybean commitment would include broader “double digit” increases in aggregate agricultural purchases spanning multiple sectors. “What we expect with the new purchase agreements … [is] double digit purchases of aggregate agricultural products,” he said. “That could be soybeans, that could be beef, that could be grains, that could be dairy products.” The USTR chief also defended criticism that the administration was merely recycling earlier commodity purchase promises. “So we have the existing soybean deal that they may be referring to, and then over on top of that we have these agricultural products as well,” Greer said. Greer additionally confirmed that Boeing aircraft sales announced by President Trump are proceeding. “The 200 Boeings, those are locked in,” Greer said. “This is the first major purchase by China in almost 10 years of Boeings or orders.” Meanwhile, Greer portrayed the broader trade negotiations as an effort to rebalance commerce between the two countries while maintaining mutually beneficial supply relationships. “We are focused on mutually beneficial trade,” he said. “That’s why we’re so focused on non-sensitive trade.” Greer also highlighted ongoing Chinese cooperation on agricultural biotechnology approvals and import access. “They’re working with us on biotech traits to make sure that those types of products that have genetic modification can go into China without any problem,” he said.   Greer: Trump/Xi did not discuss tariffs directlyUSTR says bilateral negotiators are handling tariff talks as leaders focus on broader strategic issues U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in recent interviews that President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping did not directly discuss tariffs during their summit meetings, emphasizing instead that tariff negotiations are being handled by working-level officials from both governments. Greer said the Trump/Xi discussions focused more broadly on the strategic direction of the U.S./China relationship, economic cooperation and geopolitical issues, while technical tariff discussions continue through ongoing channels between trade and economic officials. The comments reinforced the administration’s message that broader trade negotiations remain active despite the absence of a headline tariff breakthrough during the leaders’ meetings. According to Greer, negotiators from both countries are continuing discussions surrounding tariff structures, market access, enforcement mechanisms and sector-specific trade concerns. The administration has signaled that agriculture, industrial goods, technology trade and supply-chain security remain central areas of focus. In a statement on Saturday, a Chinese ministry said the U.S. and China would discuss tariff reductions through a newly established trade board, and had “agreed in principle to lower tariffs on products of respective concern on a comparable scale.” The products would include agricultural goods, the ministry said. The clarification is important for financial and commodity markets, which had initially looked for signs that Trump and Xi might personally intervene to reduce tariff tensions following their Beijing summit. Instead, Greer suggested the process remains more incremental and institutionally driven, with negotiators tasked with resolving details before any leader-level decisions are finalized. Meanwhile, administration officials continue to portray the summit as constructive, pointing to expanded communication channels and ongoing discussions tied to agriculture purchases, investment frameworks and broader trade normalization efforts between Washington and Beijing.  Analysis: China purchase commitments raise bigger questions for grain marketsUSTR Greer says China’s 25 MMT soybean commitment is separate from a broader $17 billion annual agricultural purchase target Grain markets are increasingly trading the possibility that the Trump administration’s new understandings with China could translate into a major increase in U.S. agricultural exports, particularly soybeans. But while the headline numbers — including discussion of roughly $17 billion annually in additional farm purchases (prorated for 2026) and 25 million metric tons of U.S. soybean imports per year — sound supportive on the surface, the practical implications for demand, pricing and trade flows remain far less certain. The bullish tone in grain futures has intensified following comments by U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer indicating that the proposed $17 billion annual agricultural purchase framework would come in addition to — not inclusive of — China’s previously discussed commitment to buy 25 MMT of U.S. soybeans annually. That distinction is significant. At current soybean prices, 25 MMT of soybean purchases alone could equate to roughly $11 billion to $13 billion annually on an FOB basis depending on futures prices, basis levels and freight spreads. If those soybean purchases are additive to another $17 billion in agricultural imports, total Chinese purchases of U.S. farm products could theoretically approach or exceed $28 billion to $30 billion annually. Such a program would imply extremely large Chinese purchases not only of soybeans, but also corn, sorghum, ethanol, cotton, wheat, pork, beef, poultry and potentially other value-added agricultural products. That possibility helps explain some of the recent firmness in grain markets. Traders see the potential for materially stronger U.S. export demand at a time when weather concerns in parts of the U.S. Corn Belt and Brazil’s safrinha corn areas are already creating underlying supply uncertainty. However, one of the biggest unanswered questions is whether these purchases would represent truly incremental demand or simply redirected trade.China already imports enormous volumes of soybeans annually, primarily from Brazil and the United States. If Beijing shifts purchases away from Brazil toward the U.S. to satisfy political commitments, the net impact on global demand could be smaller than the headline figures suggest. In that scenario, U.S. exports would rise, but Brazilian supplies could be redirected into other export channels, limiting the overall tightening effect on world soybean balances. That distinction matters greatly for futures markets. Incremental demand can support sustained rallies and tighter ending stocks. Redirected trade often creates only temporary price support as global supply chains adjust. Another major uncertainty is enforcement. Market participants continue to ask what mechanisms would actually compel China to make purchases if market economics move against them. During the Phase One agreement negotiated during President Donald Trump’s first term, China ultimately fell short of several purchase targets despite significant buying activity. The absence of hard enforcement mechanisms became a persistent criticism of that framework. That raises several unanswered questions for traders and exporters: • Are the purchase targets legally binding or politically aspirational?• Are there minimum annual purchase requirements?• Would Chinese state-owned enterprises be directed to buy regardless of price competitiveness?• What penalties would exist if China falls short?• Would enforcement rely on tariffs, licensing approvals, retaliatory actions or broader trade leverage? Without clarity on those issues, markets may hesitate to fully price in the most optimistic export scenarios. Another key area of intrigue is the proposed “Board of Trade” concept discussed by Greer and other administration officials. So far, administration officials have provided only broad descriptions, but the idea appears aimed at creating a more formalized mechanism for managing trade in non-sensitive goods between the two countries. In practical terms, it could function as a structured platform through which the U.S. and China coordinate large-scale commodity purchases, reduce political volatility around agricultural trade and potentially streamline purchasing arrangements for products like soybeans, corn, ethanol and meat. Some analysts view the concept as an attempt to institutionalize commodity trade flows and reduce the boom-and-bust nature of U.S.-China agricultural relations that has characterized the past decade. Others see risks. Critics argue that a government-directed or heavily managed trade structure could distort normal commercial market signals and potentially inject more politics into commodity purchasing decisions. Questions also remain about whether the Board of Trade would simply facilitate dialogue or whether it would actively coordinate purchases, volumes, financing or compliance monitoring. For grain markets, the bottom line is that the announcement has improved sentiment because traders now see the possibility of a much larger agricultural export program than many initially assumed. Meanwhile, the lack of operational details means the market is still trading expectations more than confirmed fundamentals. As a result, futures markets are likely to remain highly sensitive to additional details from the Trump administration, Chinese officials and USDA export sales data over the coming weeks. If fully implemented, the combined commitments discussed by Greer could represent one of the largest state-directed agricultural purchasing programs in modern U.S./China trade history.Putin heads to Beijing after Trump/Xi summitRussian President Vladimir Putin will visit China on May 19-20 for talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, underscoring Beijing and Moscow’s efforts to deepen their strategic partnership just days after Xi hosted President Donald Trump in Beijing  The Kremlin confirmed Friday that Vladimir Putin will travel to China at the invitation of Xi Jinping, with the trip marking the 25th anniversary of the 2001 Treaty on Good-Neighbourliness, Friendship and Cooperation between the two countries. The agreement, signed by Putin and former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, laid the foundation for expanded political, economic, and security cooperation between Moscow and Beijing. According to the Kremlin, the leaders will discuss bilateral relations and ways to deepen their “comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation,” while also addressing major regional and international issues. The timing of the visit is particularly notable given that it comes immediately after Xi’s high-profile summit with Donald Trump, which focused heavily on trade, tariffs, and broader U.S.-China relations. The visit is expected to reinforce perceptions that China is balancing engagement with Washington while simultaneously strengthening ties with Russia amid continued geopolitical tensions with the West. Moscow and Beijing have increasingly aligned on issues ranging from energy trade and financial cooperation to opposition to what both governments describe as Western-led containment strategies. The Kremlin also said Russia and China are expected to sign a joint statement along with multiple intergovernmental agreements and cooperation documents during the visit. Putin is additionally scheduled to meet with Chinese Premier Li Qiang to discuss trade and economic cooperation. The trip highlights the continuing importance of the China-Russia relationship for both governments as they seek to counterbalance U.S. influence and expand economic coordination in areas such as energy, infrastructure, technology, and cross-border trade. Trump warns Iran as UAE nuclear plant hit by dronesEscalation around Gulf energy infrastructure rattles markets, pushes oil above $110 and raises fears over Hormuz disruptions President Donald Trump sharply escalated rhetoric toward Iran on Sunday, warning that the “clock is ticking” after drones targeted the United Arab Emirates’ Barakah nuclear power plant, highlighting the fragility of the current ceasefire and intensifying fears of a broader regional conflict. Trump, posting on Truth Social after returning from China, said Tehran “better get moving, FAST, or there won’t be anything left of them,” marking some of his most forceful comments since the U.S./Israeli conflict with Iran entered a tentative ceasefire phase in April. The remarks came as global markets reacted nervously to renewed instability in the Gulf. Oil prices extended gains Monday, with Brent crude climbing roughly 1.5% to about $110.70 per barrel as traders increasingly priced in risks to Middle East energy supplies and shipping lanes. Meanwhile, the global bond selloff deepened, with U.S. 10-year Treasury yields rising above 4.5% to their highest levels in roughly 15 months. Investors are increasingly concerned that sustained energy inflation could force central banks to maintain tighter monetary policy for longer. The latest escalation centered on the UAE’s Barakah Nuclear Power Plant, where a drone strike sparked a fire at a power station connected to the nuclear facility. UAE authorities said there was no radiological impact and that two additional drones were intercepted. Abu Dhabi said the drones originated from the western UAE, though responsibility for the attack remains unclear. Saudi Arabia separately reported intercepting three drones entering its airspace from Iraq, an area where multiple Iran-backed militias operate. Officials did not confirm whether those drones were connected to the UAE attack. Anwar Gargash, senior adviser to UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, condemned the strike as a “dangerous escalation” that violated international norms, warning that the region faces growing threats from “chaos and sabotage.” Iran has not publicly commented on the attacks. The developments underscore the increasingly volatile environment surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint that handles roughly one-fifth of global oil and LNG shipments. Markets remain highly sensitive to any indication that Iran or its proxies could threaten Gulf infrastructure or maritime traffic. Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency said Washington has presented Tehran with five main conditions for a peace agreement, including transferring enriched uranium to the United States. The reported framework would reportedly not include war reparations and would release only a limited portion of Iran’s frozen overseas assets. The Trump administration has not publicly confirmed the terms. Iran, meanwhile, is reportedly demanding reparations, broader sanctions relief, the removal of restrictions on Iranian ports, and continued influence over shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz before agreeing to any final settlement. Trump told Axios over the weekend that negotiations remain ongoing but warned that Tehran must move closer to U.S. demands. “We want to make a deal,” Trump said. “They are not where we want them to be. They will have to get there or they will be hit badly.” The conflict, which began Feb. 28, has already claimed thousands of lives across Iran and Lebanon and has increasingly drawn Gulf states into the confrontation through retaliatory drone and missile attacks targeting U.S. allies including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Israel.
FINANCIAL MARKETS


Equities today: U.S. equity futures extended Friday’s losses overnight and were moderately lower Monday morning after the weekend produced no meaningful progress toward a U.S./Iran ceasefire. Meanwhile, the UAE and Saudi Arabia reported limited drone attacks targeting energy infrastructure, underscoring that while markets still largely expect a ceasefire eventually, the risk of renewed fighting is increasing.

On the economic front, China released another round of disappointing data. Industrial Production rose 4.1% versus expectations of 6.0%, Fixed Asset Investment fell 1.6% compared to forecasts for a 1.7% gain, and Retail Sales increased just 0.2%, well below the expected 2.0%.

Markets will remain heavily focused on geopolitical developments today as President Donald Trump meets with his national security team. While investors do not yet view renewed direct U.S. military action against Iran as the base-case scenario, the probability of escalation appears to be rising — and any renewed conflict would likely pressure risk assets sharply lower.

Outside of geopolitics, the only notable economic release is the Housing Market Index, expected at 34, though the report is unlikely to materially impact trading.

In Asia, Japan -1%. Hong Kong -1.1%. China -0.1%. India +0.1%.
 

In Europe, at midday, London +0.1%. Paris -0.9%. Frankfurt +0.1%.

Bond market rout pressures Fed as inflation fears intensify

ING’s Chris Turner says rising Treasury yields, sticky inflation and elevated oil prices are fueling concerns that the Federal Reserve may be forced to adopt a more hawkish tone despite recent dovish signals 

In a new market note, ING Economics analyst Chris Turner argued that the dominant story in global financial markets is the sharp sell-off in government bonds, particularly at the long end of the U.S. Treasury curve. Turner said the move has produced a bearish steepening pattern, with 10-year Treasury yields climbing to their highest levels since early 2025 following a string of hotter-than-expected U.S. inflation readings.

Turner pointed specifically to April producer price inflation data, which showed final demand PPI rising 6% year-over-year — levels not seen since early 2023. He said the inflation data is “pressure-testing” the Federal Reserve and lending credibility to the three dissenting voices at the April Federal Open Market Committee meeting who opposed the dovish tilt embedded in the Fed’s statement.

According to Turner, bond investors increasingly fear the Fed risks “falling behind the curve” if inflation remains stubbornly elevated. While he said markets are not necessarily expecting an imminent rate hike, the current environment may force policymakers to sound more hawkish in upcoming speeches and communications.

Attention this week will focus heavily on Federal Reserve messaging rather than economic data releases. Turner noted that Wednesday’s FOMC minutes could reveal more details about the internal hawkish dissent within the central bank. However, he suggested that comments from Fed Governor Christopher Waller may prove even more important, particularly if Waller signals openness to tighter policy after previously favoring an extended pause.

Turner said any meaningful shift toward a more hawkish Fed stance could flatten the yield curve and strengthen the U.S. dollar further.

Meanwhile, ING warned that elevated oil prices combined with rising long-term bond yields create a “bearish double whammy” for emerging market currencies and broader risk assets. Turner added that U.S. equity markets now face a more difficult backdrop as investors await Nvidia earnings this week, which he described as critical for sustaining the increasingly narrow rally in the S&P 500.

The note also highlighted the growing relationship between equity market sentiment and dollar performance. Turner said the recent combination of high energy prices and rising Treasury yields argues for a stronger dollar environment and greater pressure on equities.

On the currency front, Turner said the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) faces technical resistance near 99.50 and support around 99.00. He also noted that upcoming Treasury International Capital (TIC) data for March will be watched closely for signs of foreign demand for U.S. assets.

So far, Turner said there is little evidence that overseas investors are meaningfully pulling away from U.S. securities markets. He argued that the dollar’s recent resilience suggests last year’s temporary loss of safe-haven status following the “Liberation Day” tariff shock was cyclical rather than structural.

AGRIBUSINESS

Deere faces new right-to-repair lawsuit from landscaping contractor

Illinois complaint targets Deere’s construction and forestry equipment practices, echoing allegations from recently settled farmer antitrust case

A Chicago-based landscaping contractor has filed a new antitrust lawsuit against Deere & Company, accusing the machinery giant of unfairly restricting owners and independent repair shops from fixing construction and forestry equipment.

The lawsuit, filed last week in U.S. District Court in Illinois by Christy Webber & Co., mirrors many of the claims raised in a recently settled $99 million right-to-repair case brought by farmers against Deere. The earlier litigation centered on allegations that Deere limited access to critical software tools, diagnostics and repair information needed to service equipment without relying on authorized dealerships.

Repair-rights advocates are now seeking to elevate the latest complaint to class-action status, a move that could potentially allow thousands of owners of Deere construction and forestry machines to join the case as plaintiffs.

According to the complaint, Deere allegedly uses software locks and proprietary repair systems to restrict what customers and independent mechanics can repair on company equipment, effectively steering repair work toward Deere-authorized dealers. Critics argue the practices raise repair costs, increase downtime and limit competition in the equipment service market.

The lawsuit underscores the expanding reach of the broader “right-to-repair” movement beyond agriculture and into commercial landscaping, construction and forestry sectors, where contractors increasingly rely on technologically advanced equipment that requires software-enabled diagnostics and calibration.

Deere has faced mounting scrutiny in recent years from farmers, lawmakers and repair-rights groups over its repair policies, even as the company has defended its practices as necessary to ensure equipment safety, emissions compliance and cybersecurity protections.

AG MARKETS

Overnight grain markets rally on China trade optimism, weather concerns

Corn, soybeans and wheat futures surge overnight as traders weigh fresh U.S./China agricultural commitments, tightening global grain supplies and ongoing weather threats in key producing regions

Grain futures posted strong overnight gains heading into Monday morning trade, with soybeans, corn and wheat all sharply higher as the market reacted to renewed optimism surrounding U.S./China agricultural trade following President Donald Trump’s summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, while weather concerns in both the U.S. and South America added additional support.

July corn futures were up 13 3/4 cents at $4.695 per bushel, supported by expectations for stronger export demand and concerns about planting delays and excessive rainfall in parts of the western Corn Belt. Traders also continued to monitor forecasts calling for freeze risks in portions of the central Plains following a sharp cold front later this week.

July soybeans led the grain complex higher, rising 25 1/2 cents to $12.025 per bushel. Soybean futures continued to draw support from expectations that China could significantly increase purchases of U.S. agricultural commodities under the new trade framework discussed during the Trump/Xi summit. Traders also pointed to weather threats in northern Brazil’s safrinha growing areas, where hot and dry conditions continue to stress crops.

Soybean product markets were also firm overnight. July soybean meal futures gained $4.30 to $338.60 per short ton, while July soybean oil futures climbed 0.84 cent to 74.72 cents per pound. Soybean oil remained supported by strength in global vegetable oil markets and ongoing expectations for steady renewable diesel demand.

Wheat futures extended recent gains amid growing concerns over global production risks and continued uncertainty surrounding Black Sea exports. July Chicago soft red winter wheat futures rose 22 cents to $6.5775 per bushel, while July Kansas City hard red winter wheat futures gained 13 3/4 cents to $7.0175 per bushel.

Weather remained a major driver for wheat markets, particularly with freeze concerns emerging across portions of the western Plains and continued dryness in sections of the Black Sea region. Meanwhile, traders also monitored excessive moisture forecasts for parts of the Mid-South and southern Plains that could create harvest and logistical complications.

Beyond weather, broader macroeconomic and geopolitical developments also remained supportive to commodity markets. Crude oil futures moved higher overnight amid continued tensions involving Iran and renewed concerns about energy supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz, helping underpin broader commodity inflation expectations.

Global grain markets firm as weather threats and trade optimism support prices

International grain prices strengthened May 18 as traders weighed adverse weather in key producing regions, improving prospects for U.S./China agricultural trade and continued competitiveness of U.S. exports in global markets

International grain markets on May 18 traded with a firmer tone across several major exchanges as traders monitored adverse weather in parts of Brazil, excessive rains in portions of the U.S. Corn Belt and continued geopolitical uncertainty tied to the Middle East and Black Sea export competition. European milling wheat and corn futures remained elevated relative to comparable U.S. futures, while Chinese domestic grain prices reflected more comfortable internal supplies.

In Europe, Euronext milling wheat futures were generally trading above equivalent Chicago Board of Trade values, supported by tightening global wheat balances and weather concerns in parts of Europe and the Black Sea region. Meanwhile, Euronext corn futures near €215.50 per metric ton translated to roughly $6.50 per bushel on a U.S. equivalent basis, compared to CBOT July corn futures near $4.80 per bushel.

Chinese grain futures on the Dalian exchange were comparatively subdued, reflecting adequate domestic inventories and softer feed demand growth. Dalian corn futures near 2,356 yuan per metric ton equated to roughly $8.10 per bushel on a U.S. equivalent basis, substantially above CBOT values because of China’s internal pricing structure and import controls.

Soybean markets continued to draw support from expectations tied to the recent Trump/Xi summit and China’s renewed agricultural purchasing commitments. Traders also continued monitoring South American logistics and vegetable oil markets following strength in crude oil and palm oil prices.
 

International Grain Prices — May 18, 2026

Approximate international grain market prices and comparable U.S. equivalents

CommodityInternational Market PriceU.S. Equivalent
Euronext Wheat~€235/metric ton~$6.40/bushel
Euronext Corn€215.50/metric ton~$6.50/bushel
Dalian Corn2,356 yuan/metric ton~$8.10/bushel
CBOT July Corn~$4.695/bushel
CBOT July Soybeans~$12.025/bushel
July HRW Wheat~$7.0175/bushel

Source references include commodity exchange comparisons and prevailing market estimates as of May 18, 2026.

China’s new U.S. farm purchase commitments could reshape global trade flows

Reuters analysis says Beijing’s pledge to boost U.S. agricultural imports may redirect demand away from Brazil, Australia and other major suppliers while testing China’s long-term appetite for U.S. commodities

Reuters reported that China has committed to purchasing at least $17 billion annually in additional U.S. agricultural products for the next three years following last week’s summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing (prorated for 2026). The commitment comes on top of previously discussed soybean purchases and could lift total annual Chinese imports of U.S. agricultural goods to roughly $28 billion to $30 billion, according to traders and analysts cited by Reuters.

According to Reuters, the agreement would require China to significantly expand imports of U.S. wheat, feed grains, meat products, cotton and timber to meet the target. Analysts noted that the projected import level would remain below the 2022 peak of roughly $38 billion but would represent a major rebound from the approximately $8 billion imported last year.

Reuters said the increased U.S. purchases are expected to come partly at the expense of competing exporters including Brazil, Australia, Canada and Argentina. Brazil currently dominates China’s soybean imports with more than 73% market share and has also become a leading supplier of corn. Analysts quoted by Reuters said China may need to intentionally redirect purchases toward the United States for political and strategic reasons rather than purely commercial considerations.

Soybeans are expected to remain the centerpiece of the agreement. Reuters reported that China is likely to begin buying new-crop U.S. soybeans for October shipment because U.S. supplies are competitively priced against Brazilian cargoes. Traders told Reuters that purchasing 25 million metric tons annually of U.S. soybeans should be achievable, particularly if state-owned buyers such as COFCO and Sinograin continue to handle most imports. However, China’s reliance on U.S. soybeans has fallen sharply over the past decade, with U.S. soybeans accounting for only about one-fifth of Chinese imports in 2024 compared with 41% in 2016.

Reuters also noted that China could increase purchases of U.S. sorghum and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), particularly after weather-related damage to northern Chinese crops in 2025. Meanwhile, U.S. beef and poultry exports may rise after Beijing renewed registrations for hundreds of U.S. beef facilities and approved additional processing plants for export access.

The report added that China’s restrictive grain import quota system may continue limiting large-scale imports of U.S. wheat and corn. China maintains low-tariff quotas for wheat and corn imports, with tariffs above quota levels reaching 65%, effectively capping volumes unless policy adjustments are made.

FARM POLICY

USDA advances disaster, specialty crop aid rules to OMB review

Industry awaits details on specialty crop assistance and Supplemental Disaster Relief Program implementation as regulatory review begins

USDA has sent two long-awaited final rules to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, marking another step toward implementation of key farm assistance programs tied to the Trump administration’s $12 billion farmer relief package.

The rules cover “Assistance for Specialty Crop Producers” and “Supplemental Disaster Assistance Programs, Marketing Assistance Loans, and Sugar Provisions.” Both were submitted to OMB on May 15 and are expected to provide critical details on how USDA plans to distribute specialty crop assistance and administer disaster-related support programs.

Farm groups and commodity organizations have been closely watching the rulemaking process, particularly for clarity surrounding the Supplemental Disaster Relief Program (SDRP), which producers have viewed as essential following multiple years of weather-related losses and production challenges.

The specialty crop provisions are also significant because they are expected to outline how USDA will deliver aid pledged to fruit, vegetable and other specialty crop producers under the broader administration relief effort.

OMB review of final rules can take up to 90 days or longer, although industry expectations are that USDA will press for an accelerated review given the urgency surrounding disaster assistance and specialty crop payments. Producers and agricultural groups have argued that timely implementation is critical as many operations continue to face financial pressure from weather losses, high input costs and market uncertainty.

Meanwhile, the inclusion of marketing assistance loan and sugar program provisions in the package suggests USDA is also moving to finalize broader commodity and farm program updates tied to the relief initiative.

FERTILIZER

Petrobras pushes to rebuild Brazil’s fertilizer capacity

Lula Administration Touts Domestic Nitrogen Production as Strategic Priority for Agriculture and Industry

Brazil’s state-controlled energy company Petrobras said it expects to eventually supply more than one-third of the country’s nitrogen fertilizer demand as it restarts dormant production facilities and expands domestic manufacturing capacity. The announcement came during President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s visit to the company’s Bahia fertilizer plant, known as Fafen, in Camaçari. 

The restart of the Bahia nitrogen fertilizer facility marks part of a broader effort by Petrobras and the Lula administration to reduce Brazil’s heavy dependence on imported fertilizer inputs, a longstanding vulnerability for one of the world’s largest agricultural exporters. Brazil currently imports roughly 85% to 90% of the fertilizers it consumes, despite being the world’s fourth-largest fertilizer market and accounting for about 8% of global fertilizer use.

Petrobras said the Bahia facility resumed operations in January 2026 following approximately six years of inactivity. The company invested roughly R$100 million — about $19 million to $20 million U.S. — to restart the plant, which has capacity to produce 1,300 metric tons of urea per day, or roughly 1,433 U.S. short tons daily. Petrobras said the facility can supply about 5% of Brazil’s annual urea demand. The project is also expected to generate about 900 direct jobs and another 2,700 indirect jobs in the region.

Petrobras President Magda Chambriard said the company’s combined fertilizer operations in Bahia, Sergipe, Paraná and the under-construction Mato Grosso do Sul facility could eventually meet approximately 35% of Brazil’s nitrogen fertilizer requirements.

The company has already restarted another Fafen unit in Sergipe and resumed operations at the Araucária Nitrogenados S.A. facility in Paraná. Meanwhile, Petrobras’ UFN-III fertilizer project in Três Lagoas, Mato Grosso do Sul, remains under construction and is expected to begin operations in 2029.

Nitrogen fertilizer production is especially important for Brazil’s farm economy because products such as urea are heavily used in corn, soybean, sugarcane and other large-scale crop production systems. Manufacturing nitrogen fertilizer also relies heavily on natural gas feedstocks, which Petrobras produces domestically.

Lula framed the fertilizer push as part of a broader industrial policy aimed at rebuilding strategic manufacturing sectors in Brazil and reducing reliance on imports. During remarks at the Bahia facility, he argued that Brazil cannot continue depending on foreign suppliers for critical agricultural inputs. “Brazil is an agricultural country,” Lula said. “Brazil needs fertilizer. Brazil cannot import 90% of the fertilizer our agriculture needs.”

The Brazilian president also linked the fertilizer initiative to other efforts to revive domestic industrial capacity, including shipbuilding and energy infrastructure. He criticized previous privatization efforts involving Petrobras assets, particularly the sale of BR Distribuidora — now Vibra Distribuidora — during the administration of former President Jair Bolsonaro.

Lula argued that selling Petrobras’ fuel distribution arm weakened the company’s ability to influence domestic fuel pricing and distribution logistics. He suggested Petrobras could eventually re-enter the fuel distribution business if current industrial policies continue.

The fertilizer expansion comes as global fertilizer markets remain highly sensitive to geopolitical disruptions, natural gas prices and supply chain risks. Brazil’s dependence on imported fertilizer has become a recurring concern since the Russia/Ukraine war exposed vulnerabilities in global nutrient trade flows, particularly for potash and nitrogen products.

Data cited in the report also showed Brazil’s fertilizer imports declined 12.3% during the first quarter of 2026 compared to the prior year, potentially reflecting both softer demand and growing domestic production capacity.

NEW WORLD SCREWWORM

USDA targets screwworm threat with data-driven sterile fly strategy

APHIS official says limited sterile fly supply is being deployed strategically across Mexico and Texas as USDA ramps up surveillance, contingency planning and innovation efforts

Senior farm and ranch broadcaster Ron Hays, writing for the Radio Oklahoma Ag Network’s Beef Buzz, reported (link) that U.S. agriculture officials are intensifying efforts to contain the spread of New World screwworm in Mexico while preparing for the possibility of the pest reaching the U.S. border. Rear Admiral Michael Schmoyer, Associate Administrator for USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and director of the New World Screwworm Directorate, said limited supplies of sterile flies are forcing officials to make highly targeted deployment decisions based on predictive modeling and surveillance data.

Schmoyer said there are currently more than 1,800 active screwworm cases in Mexico, including 15 cases within 100 miles of the U.S. border. Most infections have been found in calves, although cases also have been reported in dogs and goats. Because sterile fly production remains limited, APHIS is concentrating releases in areas where the insects can have the greatest impact in disrupting screwworm reproduction.

Quote of note: “We’re dropping flies mostly on the Northern Gulf side of Mexico,” Schmoyer said. “We have about 50 miles where these flies are also being dropped over the U.S. border in Texas.”

Schmoyer emphasized that APHIS uses multiple data streams and forecasting tools to determine where sterile flies should be released. The agency relies heavily on trap data, surveillance reports and information provided by Mexican authorities to anticipate where screwworm populations may spread in coming weeks rather than simply targeting existing infestations. “When we make these decisions, we look at a variety of different data based on modeling, and we predict, we forecast, and we assess,” Schmoyer said. “How can we distribute what is a limited number that we have at this moment?”

He added that the strategy is intentionally forward-looking. “What we do is we anticipate not where the fly is right now, but really where can the fly be moving towards,” Schmoyer said. “We lean forward aggressively as far as where we disperse our flies, beyond where we know the flies to be, but where they could be in a few weeks.”

Meanwhile, APHIS and state partners are conducting “tabletop exercises” to prepare for potential outbreak scenarios inside the United States. Schmoyer said those exercises help define operational roles and response coordination if screwworm were detected domestically.

USDA also has updated its New World Screwworm Playbook to Version 2.0, incorporating feedback from state governments, industry groups and federal agencies. The playbook outlines response procedures, field operations and coordination protocols in the event of an outbreak. “This is the element that helps to be able to say, boots on the ground, if this situation happened, how would we handle it?” Schmoyer said.

Schmoyer noted that USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins has directed the agency to explore additional technologies and response methods under a broader five-pronged strategy announced last year. APHIS is currently evaluating applications tied to up to $100 million in potential funding aimed at supporting innovations that could strengthen existing screwworm mitigation efforts. “And finally, we’re also very excited, because the Secretary has charged us to lean forward and look at other ways that we can do things,” Schmoyer said.

ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY

Monday: Oil extends rally as Iran war risks escalate and Gulf energy infrastructure comes under threat

Drone attacks on UAE and Saudi assets, stalled diplomacy and looming U.S. military discussions fuel fears of wider supply disruptions across the Middle East

Oil prices pushed higher Monday as investors grew increasingly concerned that efforts to contain the Iran conflict were faltering, with Reuters reporting that attacks on Gulf energy infrastructure and rising geopolitical tensions intensified fears of supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude climbed above $110 a barrel while U.S. West Texas Intermediate topped $107, extending last week’s sharp gains as markets priced in the risk of a broader regional escalation.

The latest surge followed reports of a drone strike targeting the UAE’s Barakah nuclear power plant and additional drone incursions into Saudi Arabia from Iraqi airspace. Emirati officials said they were investigating the source of the attack and warned the country reserved the right to respond to what it described as “terrorist attacks.” Saudi Arabia said it intercepted three drones and vowed to take operational measures to defend its sovereignty.

The attacks heightened concerns that Iran or allied regional proxy groups could broaden strikes against Gulf energy infrastructure if the conflict deepens further. Analysts note the incidents represented a pointed warning that renewed U.S. or Israeli military action against Iran could trigger further attacks on critical oil and energy facilities across the Gulf region.

Meanwhile, hopes for a diplomatic breakthrough faded after last week’s summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping ended without any major indication that Beijing would play a direct role in easing the conflict. China remains the world’s largest crude importer, and markets had been watching closely for signs of coordinated pressure to stabilize energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz.

Further supporting oil prices, the Trump administration allowed a sanctions waiver on Russian seaborne oil purchases to expire over the weekend. The waiver had temporarily permitted countries including India to continue buying some Russian crude shipments. Analysts said the move tightened the broader global supply outlook at a time when Middle East tensions were already threatening exports.

Fears of renewed strikes on Iran were amplifying supply concerns, while the expiration of the Russia sanctions waiver added another bullish factor for crude markets.

Attention now turns to Washington, where President Trump is expected to meet with senior national security advisers Tuesday to discuss military options regarding Iran, according to Axios. Markets are increasingly focused on whether the conflict could evolve into a broader disruption to shipping flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint that handles roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas trade.

Looming energy crunch raises fears of prolonged global supply shock

Financial Times reports the Iran war is pushing the world toward a deeper oil and fuel shortage as inventories shrink, refining bottlenecks grow, and emergency reserves begin to run low 

The global energy squeeze tied to the Iran war is expected to worsen in the coming months as the world continues consuming far more oil than it is producing, according to new reporting by the Financial Times. Analysts and energy officials warn that temporary relief measures — including strategic reserve releases, reduced fuel demand, and rerouted shipping — are masking a more serious structural supply deficit.

The core problem remains the disruption to Gulf energy exports and continued instability around the Strait of Hormuz, which normally handles roughly one-fifth of global oil and LNG flows. The International Energy Agency estimates the world is currently burning roughly 6 million barrels per day more oil than it is producing, forcing a rapid drawdown in commercial and government inventories.

While crude prices have retreated somewhat from their peak war spikes, refined fuels — particularly diesel, jet fuel, and bunker fuel used in shipping — remain critically tight. The Financial Times noted that refining capacity constraints are becoming as important as crude shortages themselves, creating fears of rolling shortages across transportation and industrial sectors even if oil production stabilizes.

Governments worldwide are increasingly shifting into conservation mode. Nearly 80 countries have introduced some form of emergency energy policy, ranging from fuel rationing and remote-work incentives to stockpiling programs and reduced industrial consumption targets. Developing economies are already experiencing fuel shortages and subsidy strains, while wealthier nations are warning consumers to brace for higher transportation and electricity costs through the summer.

The strain is also rippling through agriculture, aviation, and manufacturing. Airlines are facing soaring jet fuel costs heading into the summer travel season, shipping companies are paying sharply higher bunker fuel prices, and fertilizer production costs continue rising because of elevated natural gas and feedstock prices.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Energy Information Administration recently acknowledged the disruption is proving worse than initially forecast. The agency now expects much steeper inventory declines and warned that if Hormuz disruptions continue into the summer, Brent crude prices could surge another $20 per barrel above current levels.

Malacca Strait emerges as new geopolitical flashpoint

Hormuz crisis raises concerns that a future U.S.-China conflict could threaten another vital global trade artery central to Asian energy flows and world commerce

According to NBC News, the ongoing crisis in the Strait of Hormuz is intensifying scrutiny of the Strait of Malacca — a narrow Southeast Asian shipping lane that carries more than a quarter of global trade and most Persian Gulf oil exports bound for Asia. Officials and analysts warned that disruptions in Hormuz may serve as a preview of how maritime chokepoints could be weaponized in a future confrontation between the U.S. and China. 

The Strait of Malacca, bordered by Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia, is a critical conduit linking the Indian and Pacific oceans. The waterway is especially important to China, Japan, South Korea and the Philippines because it serves as a major energy and trade corridor. Singapore Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warned that current events in Hormuz could represent a “dry run” for future geopolitical conflict in the Pacific.

Military strategists cited in the report said control of Malacca would be a decisive factor in any future U.S./China conflict. Retired Australian naval captain Sean Andrews said the strait could become a “gatekeeping operation,” with naval powers selectively allowing or denying passage to ships. Any closure would force vessels onto longer and more expensive alternative routes through Indonesian waterways, disrupting supply chains and energy shipments.

Meanwhile, China has spent years attempting to reduce its dependence on the strait — a vulnerability once described by former Chinese President Hu Jintao as the “Malacca dilemma.” Analysts quoted in the article argued that the Hormuz crisis has altered assumptions about freedom of navigation and maritime security, with one expert warning that naval dominance alone may no longer guarantee open shipping lanes.

Regional governments have attempted to reassure global markets that they remain committed to keeping the strait open. Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand already maintain formal maritime cooperation agreements covering patrols, surveillance and intelligence sharing — unlike the less formally governed Strait of Hormuz. Singapore and Malaysia also pushed back against suggestions that the region could impose transit tolls or restrictions inspired by Iran’s tactics in Hormuz.

The report also noted that U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently announced a new defense cooperation partnership with Indonesia focused on regional stability and maritime security, underscoring growing strategic competition in Southeast Asia as tensions between Washington and Beijing intensify.

TRADE POLICY

EU scrambles for trade deal compromise ahead of Trump tariff deadline

Brussels faces mounting pressure to finalize a politically fraught U.S./EU trade accord before President Donald Trump’s July 4 deadline, as European lawmakers clash over safeguards, tariff conditions, and concerns about Washington’s reliability 

The European Union is racing to broker an internal compromise on implementing its trade agreement with the Trump administration after President Donald Trump warned that the bloc could face “much higher” tariffs if it fails to meet a July 4 deadline, according to the Financial Times.

The dispute centers on a trade framework negotiated last summer between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that would reduce EU tariffs on U.S. industrial goods and some agricultural products to zero in exchange for Washington lowering its so-called reciprocal tariffs to 15% on most European exports.

But implementation has become politically complicated inside Europe after the Trump administration imposed additional tariffs on some metal-containing products and continued threatening broader tariff hikes. The European Parliament’s center-right European People’s Party is pushing for rapid approval, arguing that failure to act could trigger another escalation in transatlantic trade tensions.

Meanwhile, Socialist and left-leaning lawmakers have demanded tougher protections, including safeguard clauses allowing the EU to suspend or reverse the agreement if U.S. imports surge or if Washington violates agreed tariff ceilings. Negotiators are also debating a “sunset clause” that would automatically terminate the deal unless renewed, with some lawmakers pushing for a 2028 expiration date.

One of the biggest sticking points is a proposed “sunrise clause” that would delay implementation until the U.S. fully complies with the agreed 15% tariff cap. European lawmakers inserted the provision after U.S. courts earlier this year ruled some Trump-era tariffs unlawful, leading Washington to adopt replacement duties that some EU officials argue exceed the negotiated ceiling.

The debate underscores broader European concerns about entering a long-term arrangement with an administration that continues to use tariff threats as leverage. Some EU lawmakers also sought language allowing suspension of the deal if Washington threatens EU territorial interests, following earlier tensions surrounding Trump’s remarks about Greenland.

Trade tensions are particularly sensitive for Europe’s export-heavy manufacturing economies, especially Germany’s auto sector. Trump has repeatedly threatened steeper duties on European vehicles if Brussels delays implementation.

Meanwhile, the EU is trying to balance avoiding a trade war with preserving leverage against Washington. Brussels has floated retaliatory tools, including use of its Anti-Coercion Instrument — often described as the EU’s “trade bazooka” — though European Commission officials reportedly want references to that mechanism softened or removed from the final compromise.

The negotiations also come amid broader geopolitical and economic strain tied to the Iran war, rising energy prices, and slowing global growth. European leaders gathering in Greece over the weekend for the inaugural Europe Gulf Forum emphasized energy security and closer regional cooperation as oil market volatility intensifies.

For agriculture, the negotiations remain especially important because the deal would lower EU barriers on certain U.S. farm exports. That could create opportunities for American producers if implementation proceeds, although European sensitivities around food standards and domestic farm protections remain politically contentious. Reuters previously reported that the EU has discussed increasing imports of U.S. soybeans, liquefied natural gas, and other products as part of broader efforts to stabilize trade relations with Washington.

CHINA

China retail sales slump as Iran war fallout hits consumer spending

Auto sales, housing-linked purchases and durable goods weaken sharply amid growing pressure on China’s consumer economy

China’s retail sales growth nearly stalled in April, underscoring mounting pressure on the country’s consumer sector as the economic fallout from the Iran war weighed on household spending and confidence. Retail sales rose just 0.2% from a year earlier in April 2026, sharply slowing from March’s 1.7% increase and missing market expectations for a 2.0% gain. The reading marked the weakest pace of consumer spending growth since December 2022.

The weakness was especially pronounced in large discretionary and housing-related purchases. Automobile sales plunged 15.3% year-over-year, while home appliances fell 15.1%, building materials dropped 13.8%, and furniture sales declined 10.4%. The data suggested consumers remained reluctant to make major purchases amid rising economic uncertainty, elevated energy costs tied to Middle East tensions, and broader concerns about income growth and employment conditions.

Some categories showed resilience, particularly staple and lower-ticket consumer items. Sales of tobacco and alcohol products climbed 11.7%, communication equipment rose 6.2%, grains, oils and food products increased 4.1%, while cosmetics sales gained 4.7%.

China’s services sector continued to outperform goods consumption. Catering revenues rose 2.2%, highlighting relatively firmer spending on dining and experiences, while retail goods sales overall slipped 0.1%. Excluding automobiles, retail sales increased 1.8%, suggesting the collapse in vehicle demand was a major drag on the headline figure.

On a month-to-month basis, retail sales fell 0.5% in April following a 0.1% decline in March, signaling weakening momentum entering the second quarter. For the January-through-April period, retail sales were up 1.9% from a year earlier.

The weak consumer data adds to growing concerns about China’s economic outlook as policymakers contend with slowing domestic demand, lingering property-sector weakness, and rising external risks tied to the Iran conflict and higher global energy prices. Economists increasingly expect Beijing to face pressure to roll out additional stimulus measures aimed at boosting household consumption and stabilizing growth.

PERSONNEL 

House Ag leaders urge Trump to fill CFTC vacancies

Bipartisan letter says full commission is needed to handle derivatives volatility, digital commodity oversight and expanding regulatory demands

House Ag Committee Chairman GT Thompson (R-Pa.) and Ranking Member Angie Craig (D-Minn.) urged President Donald Trump to nominate a full slate of bipartisan commissioners to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, arguing that the agency faces a growing list of complex regulatory challenges that require a fully staffed five-member panel.

In a May 15 letter (link), the lawmakers praised Trump’s appointment of permanent CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig and referenced Selig’s April 16 testimony before the House Agriculture Committee outlining the administration’s priorities for the agency. The letter highlighted mounting pressures on derivatives markets, including heightened volatility, rapid technological innovation and evolving market structures.

The committee leaders also pointed to the potential expansion of the CFTC’s authority over spot digital commodity transactions through pending legislation such as the bipartisan CLARITY Act, which passed the House last year. They said implementing that framework would require extensive rulemaking and additional regulatory capacity.

Thompson and Craig argued that a full commission would lead to “better regulations” and “more durable rules” while ensuring broader representation of views from derivatives market participants. They also linked the staffing push to the administration’s request for a larger CFTC budget, describing bipartisan leadership and additional financial resources as complementary priorities for maintaining U.S. leadership in global derivatives markets.

TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS 

Vance rail safety push faces GOP resistance

WSJ editorial warns union-backed rail mandates could raise costs without improving safety

The editorial board of the Wall Street Journal argued Sunday (link) that Vice President JD Vance and former aides are pressuring Republicans to attach a version of the Railway Safety Act to the upcoming surface transportation reauthorization bill, describing the effort as a union-backed “feather-bedding” campaign that would impose costly mandates on freight railroads without materially improving safety. The editorial said industries including agriculture, energy and retail oppose the proposal because of concerns it would increase shipping costs and reduce railroad investment in technology upgrades.

According to the editorial, Vance originally co-sponsored the legislation with former Sen. Sherrod Brown (R-Ohio) following the 2023 East Palestine train derailment involving Norfolk Southern. The measure stalled in the previous Congress after opposition from Republicans who argued unions were attempting to secure labor provisions they had failed to obtain through collective bargaining.

The proposal would require at least two crew members on freight trains, mandate minimum railcar inspection times, and direct the Transportation Department to impose additional safety standards for trains hauling hazardous materials, including potential limits on train length and weight.

The editorial disputed union arguments that additional staffing and inspection requirements are necessary for safety, pointing to industry statistics showing train accident rates have fallen 40% over the past two decades, derailments are down 46%, and worker casualty rates have declined 54%.

The editorial also noted that the National Transportation Safety Board concluded the East Palestine derailment was caused by an overheated wheel bearing, arguing that neither expanded staffing requirements nor longer inspections would have prevented the accident. Instead, the piece contended that forcing railroads to spend more on labor mandates could divert capital away from technologies such as automated inspection systems and track-monitoring drones.

The editorial further warned that higher compliance costs would likely be passed through the supply chain to customers including farmers, grain shippers, energy producers and retailers — a concern particularly relevant to agricultural exporters and bulk commodity transporters that rely heavily on freight rail capacity.

The piece said House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Sam Graves has resisted including the rail provisions in the broader highway bill, though the editorial claimed Vance allies inside the White House are lobbying Republicans to support the measure. It also cited a White House official as saying President Donald Trump supports including the rail legislation in the transportation package.

CONGRESS

Congress returns with reconciliation, infrastructure and key primaries in focus

Senate set for ICE funding markup and vote-a-rama as House pushes highway bill ahead of Memorial Day recess

Congress returns this week with Republicans accelerating work on a major reconciliation package, infrastructure legislation and several high-profile oversight hearings, while President Donald Trump and key Senate races add to an already packed Washington agenda. Link for details. 

In the Senate, lawmakers return Monday evening and are expected to hold a 5:30 p.m. ET vote on a nominations package. The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will meet Tuesday morning to mark up its portion of the reconciliation package focused on increased funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The Senate Budget Committee is scheduled to convene Wednesday morning to formally report the broader package, setting up a potential vote-a-rama beginning Thursday ahead of final Senate passage.

Several Senate committees also have significant hearings scheduled this week. The Senate Commerce Committee will hold a Tuesday hearing examining last year’s deadly collision involving a DCA-area aircraft incident. Meanwhile, a Senate Judiciary subcommittee will examine the Supreme Court’s recent Callais decision during a Tuesday afternoon hearing.

Appropriators will continue reviewing Trump administration budget requests across multiple agencies. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy are all scheduled to testify Tuesday before Senate Appropriations subcommittees. National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya is slated to appear Thursday.

In the House, lawmakers remain out until Wednesday, when votes resume. Republican leadership is aiming to pass its reconciliation legislation before lawmakers depart for the Memorial Day recess.

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee will also mark up a sweeping $580 billion surface transportation package Thursday. The legislation includes a five-year reauthorization of major federal highway, transit and infrastructure programs and is expected to become a centerpiece of this year’s transportation debate (see next item for details.)

At the White House, President Donald Trump is scheduled to participate Monday afternoon in a healthcare affordability event.

Meanwhile, the political spotlight shifts Tuesday to several primary elections, most notably Georgia’s Republican Senate contest. Rep. Mike Collins (R-Ga.), former football coach Derek Dooley and Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) are competing to advance to a two-person runoff for the opportunity to challenge Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) in November.

House unveils $580 billion surface transportation reauthorization bill

BUILD America 250 Act would renew highway, transit and rail programs through 2031 while adding EV user fees and streamlining project approvals

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee released a sweeping five-year, roughly $580 billion surface transportation reauthorization package Sunday (link) that would renew major federal highway, transit, rail and safety programs ahead of the Sept. 30 expiration deadline for current authorities. The legislation — formally titled the “Building Unrivaled Infrastructure and Long-term Development for America’s 250th Act,” or the “BUILD America 250 Act” — also includes a new annual $130 fee on electric vehicles and a $35 fee on hybrid vehicles to bolster the Highway Trust Fund.

The committee is scheduled to mark up the legislation May 21, setting up what is expected to become one of the largest infrastructure debates of the 119th Congress. Senate committees have not yet released companion legislation, leaving key questions unresolved over funding levels, permitting reform and potential offsets.

The legislation, led by House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Sam Graves (R-Mo.) and ranking member Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), would authorize major increases across federal highway, bridge and freight programs through fiscal 2031.

Among the largest authorizations in the bill:

• Core Federal-aid highway programs would receive nearly $57 billion in fiscal 2027, rising gradually to almost $61 billion by fiscal 2031.

• The bridge program would receive $9.2 billion annually from fiscal 2027 through 2031.

• The nationally significant multimodal freight and highway projects program would receive $1.2 billion annually.

• The Safe Streets and Roads for All program would expand from $500 million in fiscal 2027 to $1 billion annually by fiscal 2031.

• The legislation also provides $2.4 billion annually for a Surface Transportation Accelerator Grant Program aimed at speeding up project delivery.

The bill places heavy emphasis on permitting reform and environmental streamlining, dedicating an entire subtitle to accelerating environmental reviews, expanding categorical exclusions and reducing duplicative federal reviews. The package includes provisions promoting “One Federal Decision” reviews, accelerated environmental reviews and expanded state authority for project approvals.

The legislation also seeks to modernize freight and trucking policy. It includes new truck parking funding, electronic logging device certification reforms, expanded commercial driver apprenticeship programs, cargo theft advisory panels and provisions related to autonomous commercial vehicles.

Rail provisions are extensive as well, including Amtrak reforms, rail safety initiatives, hazardous materials transportation updates and new grant authorizations for intercity passenger rail and grade crossing safety.

Another notable feature is the bill’s inclusion of technology and innovation programs, including funding for intelligent transportation systems, mileage-based user fee pilot programs and restrictions tied to certain foreign-made LiDAR technologies.

The proposal also continues the federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, establishing a national aspirational goal that at least 10% of spending under major transportation titles go toward socially and economically disadvantaged small businesses.

Meanwhile, the EV and hybrid registration fee provisions are likely to become major political flashpoints. Supporters argue the fees are necessary because EV drivers generally do not pay federal gasoline taxes that fund the Highway Trust Fund. Critics, however, are expected to argue the fees disproportionately target electric vehicle adoption while doing little to fully stabilize long-term trust fund solvency.

The legislation arrives amid growing bipartisan pressure to address the looming insolvency concerns surrounding the Highway Trust Fund, while also balancing demands for expanded freight mobility, supply-chain resilience, rural infrastructure investment and transit modernization.

The current authorization under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act expires Sept. 30, raising pressure on Congress to complete reauthorization before the end of the fiscal year.

Republicans eye third reconciliation push before August

Conservatives press leadership for fast-track GOP bill on defense, fraud and election measures

House conservatives are intensifying pressure on Republican leadership to move a third budget reconciliation package before the August recess, setting up another intraparty battle over spending cuts, defense priorities and election-year politics. According to The Hill, key conservatives want to use the GOP’s final remaining reconciliation opportunity this year to boost Pentagon funding, target alleged fraud in federal programs and potentially advance voting reforms tied to the conservative-backed SAVE Act.

Leading the push is Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas), chair of the influential Republican Study Committee, who argued Republicans must deliver another major legislative win before lawmakers leave Washington for the August recess. Pfluger said Republicans need to show voters tangible progress on affordability, security and anti-fraud initiatives, insisting the conference understands “how to come together” despite the narrow House majority.

Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), chairman of the House Budget Committee, also emphasized the urgency of the timeline, noting lawmakers have roughly 25 legislative days remaining before the August break. Arrington said House Republicans need to at least move legislation out of the chamber before then.

The emerging package would build on last year’s GOP-only reconciliation law — originally branded the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” before Republicans reworked the messaging around the “Working Families Tax Cut.” Republicans are already using another reconciliation vehicle this year for a narrower immigration and border security package tied to efforts to end the prolonged Department of Homeland Security shutdown, leaving one final reconciliation opportunity available before year’s end.

Meanwhile, Republican priorities for the prospective third package have evolved as geopolitical and political pressures intensified. Early Republican Study Committee proposals focused heavily on affordability issues such as housing and energy reforms. But after President Donald Trump’s military strikes against Iran and broader GOP efforts targeting alleged federal fraud, congressional leaders increasingly aligned around combining defense spending increases with anti-fraud provisions.

On the Senate side, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has floated adding election-related provisions as part of the package, describing them as a “down payment” on the SAVE Act, a conservative-backed proposal requiring proof of citizenship and voter identification standards for registration.

Despite optimism from conservatives and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who recently told Politico he believes Republicans can meet a summer timeline, skepticism remains widespread within the GOP conference. Passing the earlier reconciliation package required months of preparation and prolonged negotiations, exposing deep divisions between fiscal conservatives demanding sharper spending cuts and moderates wary of politically damaging reductions ahead of the midterm elections.

That divide is already resurfacing. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), one of only two Republicans who opposed last year’s reconciliation law, signaled strong reservations about another party-line package. Fitzpatrick criticized reconciliation bills as inherently partisan and said he favors bipartisan negotiations through his role as co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus.

The internal debate underscores the razor-thin margin Republicans face in the House. Assuming full attendance, GOP leaders can afford no more than two defections on any party-line vote — a reality that could complicate efforts to assemble another sweeping reconciliation package on an accelerated timeline before August.

POLITICS & ELECTIONS

Trump’s Senate purge raises GOP risks

WSJ editorial warns revenge politics could imperil Republican majority

The editorial board of the Wall Street Journal argued Sunday (link) that President Donald Trump’s successful effort to help defeat Sen. Bill Cassidy in Louisiana’s Republican primary may satisfy political grievances but could ultimately weaken Republican prospects of holding the Senate majority in the 2026 midterm elections. The piece contends that Trump’s focus on punishing GOP dissenters is creating vulnerabilities in several key battleground states at a time when his approval ratings remain weak.

The editorial noted that Cassidy became a top Trump target after joining six other Republican senators in voting to convict Trump during his second impeachment trial following the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Although Cassidy later aligned with Trump on issues including the confirmation of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the editorial argued that Trump never intended to forgive the Louisiana senator.

The piece also highlighted structural changes in Louisiana politics that contributed to Cassidy’s defeat. Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and GOP lawmakers replaced the state’s open primary system with closed partisan primaries, limiting crossover support from independents and Democrats that had previously benefited Cassidy. The editorial suggested the eventual Republican nominee — either Rep. Julia Letlow or Louisiana Treasurer John Fleming — remains favored to win the seat in the deeply conservative state.

Meanwhile, the editorial warned that Trump’s broader political vendettas are complicating the GOP’s Senate map nationwide. It cited the retirement of Sen. Thom Tillis in North Carolina after clashes with Trump, growing political pressure on Sen. Susan Collins in Maine, and concerns that Sen. Joni Ernst stepping aside in Iowa could create another Democratic pickup opportunity as farmers contend with tariff pressures and inflation.

The editorial also pointed to uncertainty in Texas, where Trump has withheld support from Sen. John Cornyn amid a potential primary challenge from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Democrats are hoping Rep. James Talarico could capitalize on Republican divisions if Paxton secures the nomination.

According to the editorial, losing several of these competitive seats could reduce Republicans below the 50-seat threshold needed to maintain Senate control. The board argued that a Democratic Senate would block Trump’s judicial nominations and intensify congressional investigations into the administration and Trump family business interests during the final two years of his presidency.

WEATHER

— NWS outlook: Multi-day severe weather and flash flood threat continues across the Midwest and Plains… …Extreme fire weather concerns across the southern High Plains today into Monday… …Heavy wet snow blankets the higher-elevations of Wyoming, the Front Range, and the Wasatch Sunday night into Monday… …Well above average, hot Summer-like temperatures will continue into the first half of the week across the eastern U.S.

Storms drench western Corn Belt while frost threatens Plains crops

Heavy rainfall expected to stall planting progress this week before warmer, drier conditions return; freeze risk emerges for portions of the central Plains

An active and highly volatile weather pattern is set to dominate the western Corn Belt through Tuesday night, bringing widespread 1-2 inches of rainfall that is expected to temporarily halt planting progress across key crop areas. The moisture, however, is also projected to significantly ease the extreme dryness that had recently intensified across portions of the region.

Forecasters said the storm system will be followed by an unusually strong cold front pushing deep into the central and northern Plains, triggering freeze watches and elevating frost concerns for vulnerable crops. Overnight temperatures Tuesday morning are forecast to fall into the 30-34 degree range across eastern Colorado, western Nebraska and northwestern Kansas, threatening newly emerged row crops and sensitive winter wheat acreage.

The colder pattern is expected to be relatively short-lived. By the latter part of the 1-5 day forecast window, the broader Corn Belt is forecast to transition into a drier and less active weather regime extending through the 6-10- and 11-15-day periods. That shift should allow producers to resume fieldwork and planting activity, aided by temperatures projected to run roughly 5-7 degrees above normal.

Meanwhile, attention is also turning to the Mid-South and southern Plains, where an increasingly wet pattern is forecast to develop beginning Tuesday night. Forecast models are calling for widespread rainfall totals of 3-6 inches through the end of the 15-day outlook, raising concerns about flooding, transportation disruptions and additional planting and fieldwork delays across southern production regions.

Brazil safrinha corn forecast diverges sharply between North and South

Persistent dryness and heat threaten northern crop potential, while southern regions receive timely rains but face short-term frost risk 

Brazil’s safrinha corn belt is heading into a sharply divided weather pattern over the next 15 days, with northern producing areas expected to remain exceptionally dry and increasingly stressed, while southern regions benefit from improved moisture but face a temporary frost threat. Forecast models show little to no meaningful rainfall across Goiás, northwestern Minas Gerais, and eastern Mato Grosso through the balance of the outlook period, alongside persistently above-normal temperatures that are expected to intensify stress on developing corn.

The prolonged dryness in northern safrinha areas is raising concern about yield potential as crops move deeper into critical development stages without replenishing soil moisture. The combination of hot temperatures and lack of precipitation is expected to accelerate crop stress and increase production uncertainty in portions of central Brazil.

Meanwhile, southern safrinha regions — particularly Paraná and southern Mato Grosso do Sul — are forecast to receive beneficial rainfall during the next 1-10 days, improving soil moisture and stabilizing crop conditions. However, an unusually strong cold system is projected to push into southern Brazil by mid-week, creating a notable frost threat for parts of southern Paraná and potentially stressing vulnerable late-planted corn.

Beyond the short-term cold risk, temperatures across southern Brazil are expected to rebound quickly, with the 6-10- and 11-15-day outlooks shifting back toward warmer-than-normal conditions. Even with the moderation in the south, the broader Brazilian weather pattern continues to favor dryness and heat across key northern safrinha areas, keeping production risks elevated heading deeper into the growing season.