POLICY  •  NEWS  •  MARKETS

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY

MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 2026   |   SPECIAL REPORT & ANALYSIS

SPECIAL REPORT  |  DEERE/UAW 2027

Deere Workers Reject Extension, Setting Up a 2027 Test of UAW Power

Job security and outsourcing — not wages alone — will drive the 2027 fight.

Analysis  ·  August 24, 2026

United Auto Workers members at Deere & Co. have rejected the company’s proposed two-year contract extension, preserving the union’s opportunity to reopen the entire agreement when the current contract expires Oct. 31, 2027. Deere had offered two additional years of labor peace through 2029 in exchange for 4% general wage increases in 2026 and 2027, a $3,000 bonus and continuation of existing pension, healthcare and cost-of-living provisions.

The vote does not trigger an immediate strike or alter the current contract. Instead, workers decided that the value of retaining their 2027 bargaining date outweighed the near-term money Deere was offering.

This was less a rejection of a 4% raise than a refusal to give Deere certainty before workers know whether the agricultural equipment market will be recovering, whether laid-off employees will be recalled and whether additional production will be shifted away from UAW plants.

Deere Wanted Certainty Near the Bottom of the Cycle

Deere said it proposed the extension because equipment demand remains weak and because a longer agreement would provide stability for employees, dealers, customers and production planning. Following the vote, the company said demand remains well below 2021 levels, approximately 1,200 production workers remain on layoff and major factories in Iowa and the Quad Cities are operating at less than half the volume seen during the 2021 negotiations.

Deere, in a statement after the vote: “Like every successful company, we must continually evaluate how we operate, compete, and prepare for the future. Operational challenges and competitive pressures cannot be ignored, and they will continue to shape our decisions.”

From Deere’s perspective, extending the contract through 2029 would have removed a significant operational risk just as the company is trying to manage an uncertain recovery in large farm machinery. A strike or even prolonged bargaining in late 2027 could complicate production schedules, dealer inventories and deliveries as the equipment cycle begins to improve.

The UAW saw the same proposal differently: Deere was asking workers to surrender their strongest bargaining tool — the contract expiration date — without fully negotiating job security, outsourcing and employment levels.

UAW President Shawn Fain said Deere’s offer did not include a plan to recall roughly 1,600 laid-off employees or adequately restrict the movement of work from union plants. Deere, meanwhile, said approximately 1,200 production employees remain on layoff. Although the two sides are using different employment figures, both acknowledge that layoffs and plant utilization will be central issues in 2027.

The Union Wanted More Than a Bigger Raise

The UAW’s counterproposal reportedly called for 5% wage increases, preservation of additional lump-sum payments, incorporation of cost-of-living adjustments into base wages, retirement-account contributions tied to years of service and language prohibiting further outsourcing of products or work. Deere said the counterproposal would have cost about $500 million more than the company’s extension offer.

Table 1. What each side put on the table. Sources: Deere & Co. and United Auto Workers statements on the proposed two-year extension.

That gap shows why the disagreement could not be reduced to whether a 4% annual raise was generous. Deere was offering workers more money in exchange for predictability. The union wanted Deere to pay substantially more for that predictability and to attach enforceable employment commitments to it.

The rejection therefore represents a calculated bet by workers: that their bargaining leverage will be stronger in 2027 than it is during the current downturn.

Deere itself has said 2026 is likely to mark the bottom of the agricultural equipment cycle. If large equipment orders, used-machinery values and factory utilization improve over the next year, UAW members could enter negotiations just as Deere needs to increase production. Accepting the extension would have locked in wages and labor peace through 2029 before the extent of that recovery became clear.

The risk is that the recovery may arrive more slowly than Deere currently anticipates. Persistently weak grain prices, elevated production costs and cautious farmer spending could leave factories underutilized in late 2027, reducing the immediate economic pressure that a strike would place on the company.

Deere’s own post-vote statement leaned that way: “Demand remains well below 2021 levels, approximately 1,200 production employees remain on layoff, competition continues to intensify, and the outlook for a significant recovery remains uncertain.”

Deere’s Profits Strengthen the Union’s Argument — With an Important Caveat

The timing of the vote was awkward for Deere because it came only days after the company reported strong overall quarterly results. Deere earned $1.379 billion in its fiscal third quarter, up 7% from a year earlier, and raised the lower end of its full-year net-income forecast to $4.75 billion, leaving the upper end at $5 billion.

Those numbers allow Fain to argue that Deere can afford stronger wage and job-security commitments.

But Deere’s consolidated results also obscure the weakness within the business most directly connected to UAW agricultural equipment plants. Production and Precision Agriculture sales fell 6% during the quarter, while Construction and Forestry sales increased 18% and Small Agriculture and Turf sales rose 12%. Deere’s construction business, benefiting from infrastructure and data center investment, helped offset continued pressure in high-horsepower farm machinery.

Figure 1. Deere’s farm-machinery segment shrank while construction and small ag grew. Source: Deere & Co. fiscal third-quarter 2026 results.

That creates competing interpretations of the same company ledger.

The union will emphasize Deere’s billions of dollars in profits and its ability to return capital to shareholders. 

Deere will argue that wages and employment guarantees at large agriculture plants must reflect conditions in that particular market rather than profits generated by construction equipment or financial services.

Fain Is Extending the Detroit Strategy Beyond Autos

The rejection is consistent with the more confrontational approach Fain brought to the UAW’s 2023 negotiations with Ford, General Motors and Stellantis. The union’s “stand-up strike” strategy relied on selective and expanding walkouts designed to preserve strike funds, keep management uncertain and pressure especially important facilities.

Deere offers potential targets for a similar strategy, including major tractor, combine, engine, component and parts-distribution operations. A selective strike at a key component or distribution facility could disrupt production or dealer support without requiring every Deere member to leave work simultaneously.

Figure 2. The UAW master contract covers production plants concentrated in Iowa and the Quad Cities, plus parts distribution centers. Sources: Deere & Co.; UAW; 2021 strike facility list.

Still, Deere is not a perfect replay of Detroit.

The automakers were producing highly profitable pickups and sport-utility vehicles when Fain launched the 2023 campaign. Deere is confronting substantially weaker large-equipment demand, existing layoffs and lower factory utilization. A manufacturer with idle capacity and reduced production schedules may be better positioned to withstand a limited strike than an automaker trying to keep high-margin assembly lines running at full speed.

The balance could shift sharply, however, if the equipment market has entered a meaningful replacement cycle by the fall of 2027.

Deere Could Become the Opening Round of a Larger UAW Campaign

The Deere agreement expires about six months before the UAW’s contracts with the Detroit automakers are scheduled to expire in spring 2028. That sequencing gives the union an opportunity to use Deere as an early test of membership mobilization, strike strategy and demands centered on job security and outsourcing.

Figure 3. How the bargaining calendar sets up. Sources: Deere & Co.; United Auto Workers; company and union statements.

A strong Deere settlement could then influence expectations at other machinery, automotive, aerospace and defense manufacturers. The most transferable provisions may not be the headline wage percentage. They could instead be:

• Automatic cost-of-living protection.
• Restrictions on outsourcing.
• Product and investment commitments.
• Recall rights and layoff protections.
• Retirement contributions and profit-sharing formulas.

Those provisions address a growing labor concern: renewed U.S. industrial investment does not necessarily guarantee that existing union plants and workers will receive the resulting production.

The benchmark effect should not be overstated. Defense manufacturers, construction-equipment companies and auto suppliers have different profit margins, order books and competitive pressures. But a major settlement at a profitable, globally recognized manufacturer can establish what workers elsewhere view as a reasonable share of industrial growth.

Limited Near-Term Impact for Farmers — Greater Risk in 2027

For farmers and Deere dealers, the vote has no immediate operational effect. The current contract remains in force for more than a year.

The market implications will become more significant as the October 2027 expiration approaches. A work stoppage during an equipment recovery could delay deliveries, constrain replacement-parts availability and support used-equipment values. Dealers may respond by building inventories or encouraging customers to place orders earlier than usual.

The 2021 experience ensures neither side will dismiss that possibility. Roughly 10,000 Deere workers struck for 34 days, rejected two proposed agreements and ultimately approved a six-year contract containing an immediate 10% raise, an $8,500 ratification bonus and restored cost-of-living protection.

Bottom Line

Bottom line: Deere attempted to purchase two additional years of labor certainty while agricultural equipment demand remains depressed. UAW members decided that the 2027 bargaining opportunity — particularly the ability to negotiate over jobs and outsourcing — was worth more than the company’s early-extension package.

The union is now betting that Deere’s own forecast is correct and the equipment cycle will be improving by late 2027. Deere is betting that continued market weakness and competitive pressure will limit how much the union can demand. That clash between a profitable corporation seeking operating flexibility and workers seeking employment guarantees makes Deere one of the most important industrial bargaining tests on the horizon.

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY   |   SPECIAL REPORT  |  DEERE-UAW 2027 — MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 2026