POLICY • NEWS • MARKETS
AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 | SPECIAL REPORT & ANALYSIS
POLITICAL ANALYSIS | 2026 MIDTERMS
Democrats Gain Ground as Senate Battleground Expands Into Farm Country
Sabato shifts Iowa to Toss-up as Republican vulnerabilities spread
Analysis · September 22, 2026
Republicans face a widening midterm defense map, according to Sabato’s Crystal Ball’s Sept. 22 analysis. University of Virginia political analyst Kyle Kondik moved Iowa’s Senate race from Leans Republican to Toss-up, Michigan’s from Toss-up to Leans Democratic, and Sen. Roger Marshall’s (R-Kan.) reelection contest from Likely Republican to Leans Republican.
Table 1. Crystal Ball rating changes, Sept. 22, 2026
| Race | Previous rating | New rating |
| Iowa Senate (open) | Leans Republican | Toss-up |
| Michigan Senate | Toss-up | Leans Democratic |
| Kansas Senate (Marshall, R) | Likely Republican | Leans Republican |
| Iowa House (Miller-Meeks, R) | Not stated | Leans Democratic |
| Ohio governor (open) | Not stated | Toss-up |
| Nevada governor (Lombardo, R) | Not stated | Toss-up |
| Florida governor (open) | Not stated | Leans Republican |
| Texas governor (Abbott, R) | Not stated | Leans Republican |
Source: Sabato’s Crystal Ball (UVA Center for Politics), Sept. 22, 2026. Previous ratings for the House and governor races were not stated in the summary text.
IOWA: A COMPETITIVE BUT UNSETTLED RACE
The Iowa polling illustrates both the opportunity for Democrats and the uncertainty. A Marist survey released Sept. 22 put Democratic state Rep. Josh Turek ahead of Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa), 50% to 42%. Conducted Sept. 17–20 among 1,050 registered voters, the survey reported a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points. It also found Democrats leading Iowa’s generic congressional ballot, 50% to 45%.
Those findings suggest Hinson’s challenge extends beyond her opponent’s appeal. Marist found 43% of respondents viewed their congressional vote primarily as opposition to President Donald Trump, compared with 22% who viewed it as support. However, a registered-voter survey does not establish who will actually turn out. The eight-point Senate spread should be treated as one measurement of a competitive environment, not an expected victory margin.
KANSAS: A SPLIT-TICKET WARNING
Kansas provides a different warning. An Emerson College Polling/Nexstar Media survey conducted Sept. 15–16 showed Democrat Adam Hamilton at 45%, Marshall at 43%, Libertarian David Graham at 4% and 8% undecided. The survey of 750 likely voters carried a credibility interval of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points, leaving the Senate contest without a clear polling leader.
Yet the same respondents favored Republican gubernatorial candidate Ty Masterson over Democrat Cindy Holscher, 51% to 44%. That split suggests candidate-specific strengths and weaknesses matter: Kansas voters expressing interest in Hamilton are not necessarily abandoning Republicans across the ballot. Emerson also found Trump’s approval at 40%, disapproval at 53%, and the economy identified as the leading issue by 48% of voters.
THE CONGRESSIONAL ARITHMETIC
The congressional arithmetic is consequential. Crystal Ball’s Senate alignment now stands at 48 seats at least leaning Democratic, 47 at least leaning Republican and five Toss-ups. Assuming Democrats hold their rated seats, winning three Toss-ups would deliver 51 seats. In the House, Democrats have 211 seats at least leaning their way, Republicans 203 and 21 remain Toss-ups; Democrats would need seven of those 21 to reach 218.
The shifts extend beyond Congress. Ohio’s open governorship and Gov. Joe Lombardo’s (R-Nev.) race become Toss-ups; Florida’s open governorship and Gov. Greg Abbott’s (R-Texas) contest move to Leans Republican. Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks’ (R-Iowa) seat moves to Leans Democratic.
For campaign spending, competitive races in traditionally Republican territory create a practical problem: money needed to protect incumbents becomes unavailable elsewhere. Republicans need not lose Kansas for its competitiveness to affect the broader Senate battle.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR AGRICULTURE
For agriculture, the central question is whether economic dissatisfaction produces measurable defections among rural voters. Statewide polling alone cannot establish that farmers are changing parties or identify which farm costs are driving their decisions. But competitive contests give candidates greater incentive to address diesel, fertilizer, trade and farm income—and increase the political value of demonstrating tangible relief before November.
BOTTOM LINE
Control of Congress would determine committee leadership and negotiating leverage over farm legislation, nutrition programs and administration oversight. The emerging contest is therefore about both electoral seats and who will shape Washington’s response to pressure on the farm economy.
AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY | POLITICAL ANALYSIS | 2026 MIDTERMS — TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2026



