POLICY  •  NEWS  •  MARKETS

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY

TUESDAY, AUGUST 04, 2026   |   SPECIAL REPORT & ANALYSIS

ENERGY POLICY  |  JONES ACT WAIVER

Jones Act Waiver Extension Looks Likely as Fuel Costs Stay Elevated

Broader shipping access is easing bottlenecks but offers limited pump relief
 

Analysis  ·  August 4, 2026

Energy Secretary Chris Wright said Tuesday that another temporary suspension of the Jones Act is “quite likely,” signaling that the Trump administration does not expect U.S. energy transportation conditions to return fully to normal before the current waiver expires Aug. 16.

Wright said during a briefing at the Port of Brownsville in Texas that the waiver has helped move oil, refined fuels, natural gas liquids and fertilizer between U.S. ports. Reuters separately reported that administration officials are considering an extension but could narrow its geographic or commodity coverage in response to objections from lawmakers and the domestic maritime industry.

How long a renewed waiver would run remains an open question. The White House has not announced a duration, and officials familiar with the deliberations say details are still subject to change as the administration continues meetings with maritime industry representatives and lawmakers ahead of the Aug. 16 expiration. Precedent offers the best guide: The original waiver was issued March 17 for 60 days, and the April extension added 90 days — the maximum being discussed at the time. A similar 90-day renewal would carry the exemption into mid-November, past the peak of hurricane season and the fall fertilizer application window. But given the pressure from House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and other Gulf Coast Republicans to narrow or end the program, the next extension could be shorter — a 30- or 60-day renewal would let the administration preserve the tool while signaling that the exemption is winding down rather than becoming permanent.

The increasingly likely extension underscores an uncomfortable reality for the administration: Even as officials express optimism that disrupted energy flows associated with the U.S./Iran war will eventually normalize, they are not yet confident enough in that outlook to surrender one of the few immediate tools available for easing domestic fuel-distribution constraints.

Waiver Has Become More Than a Symbolic Step

The Jones Act generally requires cargo moving between U.S. ports to travel on vessels that are U.S.-built, U.S.-owned and eligible for domestic coastwise trade. Federal navigation laws can be waived when the administration determines doing so is necessary in the interest of national defense and qualified U.S. vessels are not sufficiently available.

The current waiver, originally issued March 17 for 60 days and subsequently extended by 90 days, covers roughly 659 categories of energy products and fertilizer inputs. It has become the broadest and longest Jones Act suspension in decades.

Table 1. Key terms of the current Jones Act waiver. Sources: Department of Energy; Reuters.

Its use has accelerated. Government data show the exemption was used nearly 200 times through the end of July. As of July 10, a Cato Institute tracker based on required Maritime Administration voyage reports had recorded the totals below.

Table 2. Waiver activity recorded by the Cato Institute tracker, based on Maritime Administration voyage reports, as of July 10.

Those figures show the waiver is creating real transportation options, particularly between Gulf Coast refineries and markets that lack adequate pipeline connections or local refining capacity. California, Puerto Rico, Florida and parts of the Northeast are among the areas most exposed to high coastal freight costs and disruptions in international supply.

Figure 1. Where waiver cargoes are moving: Gulf Coast origins and the leading destination markets, as of July 10. Sources: Cato Institute tracker; Maritime Administration voyage reports.

Helpful Logistically, but Not a Cure for $4 Gasoline

Wright said the waiver has helped lower energy prices in California and on the East Coast. There is evidence that some individual shipments have been less expensive than they would have been on Jones Act-compliant vessels, especially on long routes from the Gulf Coast through the Panama Canal to California.

But the broader effect on retail gasoline prices appears modest.

A Reuters analysis of the waiver’s first two months found that foreign vessels moved about 84,000 barrels of gasoline per day, compared with national consumption of roughly 8.75 million barrels per day. On Gulf Coast-to-West Coast shipments, the estimated transportation savings were about 6.6 cents per gallon — meaningful to a refiner or wholesaler but equal to only about 1% of California’s retail gasoline price at the time.

Figure 2. Waiver gasoline movements are small relative to national demand: about 84,000 barrels per day over the waiver’s first two months versus consumption of roughly 8.75 million. Source: Reuters analysis.

The current national average for regular gasoline is about $4.09 per gallon, nearly 94 cents above a year ago, according to AAA. Diesel averages more than $5.37 per gallon.

Figure 3. Retail pump prices remain well above year-ago levels. Source: AAA national averages.

The waiver therefore should be viewed as a freight and supply-resilience measure rather than a major price-control mechanism. It can prevent localized shortages, increase competition for coastal transportation and allow refiners to redirect cargoes more quickly. It cannot offset the larger forces setting fuel prices: global crude costs, restricted Strait of Hormuz traffic, refinery margins, international tanker rates and regional fuel specifications.

Put another way, the waiver may shave pennies off some shipments, but it cannot neutralize a geopolitical oil shock.

Fertilizer Benefit Shifts Toward Fall and Contingency Planning

For agriculture, retaining fertilizer and fertilizer inputs within the waiver would preserve an additional logistical option. The immediate benefit is less pronounced than it was when the exemption was first issued in March, when farmers and suppliers were preparing for the spring application season.

An August extension would be more relevant to late-summer inventory rebuilding, fall ammonia movements and contingency planning for the hurricane season. It would also give suppliers greater flexibility should another disruption affect Gulf Coast production, inland transportation or imported fertilizer availability.

That does not guarantee lower farm level fertilizer prices. Global natural gas and ammonia markets, production costs and international trade flows remain more important price drivers. But additional vessel availability can reduce the risk that a regional transportation bottleneck turns into a physical shortage or sharp local price spike.

Domestic Maritime Opposition Is Intensifying

The waiver remains politically and legally contentious because the Jones Act is also intended to support U.S. shipbuilding, maritime employment and military sealift capability.

The American Maritime Partnership argues that the administration’s blanket approach has transferred domestic cargoes to foreign operators without producing measurable nationwide gasoline relief. Its analysis of the initial waiver period contends that U.S. vessels were available for most qualifying voyages and that the shipments were primarily commercial rather than directly connected to military operations.

Jones Act critics reach the opposite conclusion. Cato’s analysis says all 56 Jones Act-qualified tankers were fully employed during the period it examined, suggesting foreign vessels added capacity rather than displaced idle U.S. ships. It also found unusually large increases in domestic waterborne shipments to the West Coast, Puerto Rico and New England.

Table 3. The competing claims over the waiver’s first months. Sources: American Maritime Partnership; Cato Institute.

That dispute explains why the next extension may not simply repeat the existing waiver. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) are among the Republicans pressing the administration to impose tighter limits, potentially including geographic restrictions, narrower commodity eligibility or greater scrutiny of individual voyages.

Analysis: Extension Signals Continued Uncertainty

Wright’s remarks make another extension the base-case expectation, but the final version may be more restrictive.

The administration has little incentive to allow the waiver to expire abruptly while gasoline remains above $4 per gallon and Strait of Hormuz traffic remains impaired. Even a small reduction in freight costs is preferable to voluntarily removing transportation capacity during an energy emergency.

Still, extending the waiver also weakens the argument that it is merely a brief response to an acute disruption. The longer the exemption remains in place — and the more routinely companies use it — the more it begins to resemble an alternative domestic shipping system rather than a temporary emergency measure.

That could eventually force a broader policy debate over whether the U.S. has enough Jones Act-qualified tankers, whether waivers are being used too broadly and whether Congress should address domestic shipping costs directly instead of relying on repeated emergency suspensions.

Bottom line

For now, the administration’s message is pragmatic: The waiver will remain available while energy markets are unsettled. But Wright’s assurance that “things will go back as they were” after normal flows return leaves unanswered the central question — when, and under what conditions, the White House will decide that the emergency has truly ended.

Sources: Department of Energy remarks at the Port of Brownsville; Reuters; Cato Institute Jones Act waiver tracker; Maritime Administration voyage reports; AAA; American Maritime Partnership.

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY   |   ENERGY POLICY  |  JONES ACT WAIVER — TUESDAY, AUGUST 04, 2026