POLICY  •  NEWS  •  MARKETS

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2026   |   SPECIAL REPORT & ANALYSIS

MARKET PERSPECTIVE  |  FED, JOBS & FARM TRADE

Strong Jobs Report Lifts Fed Hike Odds as Trump Ties Rates to Trade

August payrolls beat forecasts; deficit-country threat raises farm-trade risk

Analysis  ·  September 4, 2026

A surprisingly strong August jobs report sharply strengthened the case for the Federal Reserve to raise — not cut — interest rates this month, creating an immediate conflict with President Donald Trump’s renewed demand for substantially lower rates and his threat to use trade policy if the Fed does not comply.

The August numbers

U.S. nonfarm payrolls increased 162,000 in August, nearly triple the roughly 56,000 expected by economists surveyed by Reuters, while the unemployment rate remained at 4.1%. July employment was revised dramatically higher, from an initially reported 23,000-job decline to a 21,000 increase. June was also revised higher, leaving combined employment in June and July 55,000 above previous estimates.

Table 1. August 2026 employment report at a glance. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Reuters survey of economists.

Figure 1. Forecast versus actual payroll changes and the July revision, in thousands of jobs. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Reuters.

The headline was unquestionably strong, although the details were somewhat less broad-based. Restaurants and bars added 59,000 jobs and local-government education added 42,000, accounting for more than 60% of the overall payroll increase. But manufacturing also was a bright spot, adding 16,000 jobs in August and 58,000 since December 2025. Construction payrolls rose 22,000 and health care added 13,000. Average hourly earnings increased 0.3% for the month and 3.1% from a year earlier.

Figure 2. August payroll gains by sector, in thousands. “All other” is the residual after the five sectors cited. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Fed implications

The immediate Fed implication runs directly counter to Trump’s call for rate cuts. Short-term interest-rate futures following the report put the probability of a rate increase at the Sept. 15-16 Federal Open Market Committee meeting at roughly 62%-65%, up from about 55% before the report. Treasury yields moved higher and the dollar strengthened. The key remaining data will be inflation: August PPI arrives Sept. 10 and CPI Sept. 11.

Figure 3. Futures-implied probability of a rate increase at the September FOMC meeting, before and after the jobs report. Source: short-term interest-rate futures.

Table 2. Key dates ahead of the September Fed decision. Source: BLS and Federal Reserve calendars.

Trump ties rates to trade

Trump nevertheless responded by again demanding substantially lower rates, arguing that high borrowing costs leave the United States at an international disadvantage. He then linked monetary policy to trade policy, writing that the Fed should lower rates or he would stop trading with countries “with which we have a deficit.” The distinction is important: Trump said trade deficit, not trade surplus.

That raises a significant policy contradiction. Restricting trade with countries supplying large volumes of goods to the United States could increase import costs and potentially add to inflation — precisely the development that could make the Fed more reluctant to reduce interest rates.

Agriculture’s exposure

It also could create major exposure for agriculture. The United States currently runs substantial goods deficits with both Mexico and Canada. Through July, the U.S. goods deficit with Mexico totaled about $128.9 billion, while the deficit with Canada was about $28.2 billion.

Yet Mexico and Canada are simultaneously America’s two largest agricultural customers. USDA data show Mexico purchased $30.63 billion of U.S. agricultural products in 2025, or 17.9% of total U.S. farm exports, while Canada bought $28.68 billion, or 16.7%. Together they accounted for more than one-third of U.S. agricultural exports.

Table 3. Deficit partners that are also top farm customers. Source: Census Bureau trade data; USDA.

Figure 4. U.S. goods deficit with Mexico and Canada versus their purchases of U.S. agricultural products. Source: Census Bureau; USDA.

The agriculture risk is therefore retaliation. If Trump’s statement were translated literally into restrictions against major deficit countries, U.S. agriculture could become vulnerable to countermeasures against corn, pork, dairy, beef and other products — particularly in Mexico and Canada. Mexico alone bought more than $8 billion of U.S. grains, feeds and fodders in 2025.

Bottom line

The jobs report substantially improved the picture of the U.S. labor market and showed meaningful improvement in manufacturing, but it did not strengthen the economic argument for an immediate Fed rate cut. Instead, markets increased bets on a September rate hike. 

Trump’s proposal to link Fed policy with trade restrictions adds another layer of uncertainty because broad restrictions against deficit countries could raise inflation while simultaneously threatening some of agriculture’s most important export markets. 

Much now depends on the Sept. 10 PPI and Sept. 11 CPI reports, which could determine whether the strong employment report becomes the final push toward another Fed increase.

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY   |   MARKET PERSPECTIVE  |  FED, JOBS & FARM TRADE — FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 04, 2026