POLICY  •  NEWS  •  MARKETS

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY

THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2026   |   SPECIAL REPORT & ANALYSIS

TRADE POLICY  |  TARIFF ENFORCEMENT

Tariff Evasion Gets a Price Tag: White House Maps a 40-Country ‘Shadow Transshipment Network’

A new Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy report pegs illegal transshipment of China-linked goods at $40 billion to $303 billion a year, ties it to lost tariff revenue and factory jobs, and previews an AI-driven enforcement crackdown.

Analysis  ·  August 13, 2026

The White House has put a name, a map and a price tag on tariff evasion. In a 25-page report (link) released this month, the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy (OTMP) argues that a “Great Transshipment Scam” — the illegal rerouting of China-linked goods through more than 40 lower-tariff countries — is draining tens of billions of dollars a year from the U.S. Treasury and putting sustained pressure on American manufacturing communities.

The document is part analysis, part enforcement manifesto. It assembles five independent estimates of the scam’s scale, charts the “Shadow Transshipment Network” through which it operates, quantifies the budgetary and economic stakes, and previews the administration’s answer: an AI-enabled “Detective Border” at U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), backstopped by Executive Order 14411 and first-of-their-kind origin provisions in the Agreements on Reciprocal Trade.

How the scam works

The mechanics are old — the report calls illegal transshipment “smuggling disguised as trade — fraud cloaked in paperwork.” Peter Navarro, the White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing whose office produced the report, was blunter at the rollout: it is “the latest form of one of the oldest tricks in the book and that is smuggling,” a scheme that has “let communist China launder its exports” through dozens of intermediary countries. The modern version dates to 2018, when Section 301 tariffs covering nearly 70% of Chinese exports to the U.S. (roughly $370 billion in goods) pushed Chinese exporters to route shipments through third countries. Minor processing, relabeling, repackaging or fresh paperwork creates the appearance of a new national origin while the underlying Chinese content stays largely intact. The tariff spread — hundreds of millions of dollars per billion dollars of goods — finances the warehouses, free zones and “screwdriver factories” that keep the system running.

The report sorts the participating jurisdictions into three tiers: “diversified scale leaders” such as Canada, Mexico, the European Union, India, Japan and South Korea, where transshipment risk is embedded within large legitimate trade flows; deeply China-integrated platforms such as Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brazil and Turkey; and smaller “opportunistic targets” — from Cambodia and Laos to Panama, Jordan and the UAE — offering cheap labor, free zones, strategic ports or thin customs enforcement. Functionally, the network runs from Southeast Asian assembly “microhubs” to Europe’s processing belt in Poland and the Czech Republic to the maritime-gateway model of Jebel Ali.

Every dollar lost to this Great Transshipment Scam is a dollar stolen from American workers, manufacturers, and taxpayers.

Five estimates, one direction

How big is it? The report leans on five independent analyses rather than a single number, and the spread is wide: $40 billion to $303 billion a year (Figure 1). Goldman Sachs isolates the narrow rerouting channel at about $40 billion. The White House Council of Economic Advisers screens 301-covered products for a $34.2–$89.6 billion range, rounded to a $60 billion midpoint. Supply-chain firm Exiger lands at $75 billion, Commerce’s $109 billion is a broader trade-transfer benchmark, and Altana’s $303 billion is an upper-bound exposure measure. The report is candid that the figures are neither additive nor directly comparable — they use different data, product screens and definitions — but argues they converge on one conclusion: the scale is economically significant.

Figure 1. Five estimates of annual illegal transshipment flows or exposure. Source: White House OTMP, “The Great Transshipment Scam” (August 2026), Table 3.

The most striking cross-check is Commerce’s transaction-level test, which flags goods only when the exact same HS8 product was imported from China and re-exported to the U.S. from the same local region in the same quarter. Even limited to three hubs — Mexico, India and Vietnam — that strict standard finds $67 billion transshipped in 2025, with $28 billion in lost tariff revenue.

The cost to the Treasury

Applying illustrative tariff differentials of 25%, 35% and 45% to those flow estimates yields annual tariff-revenue losses from roughly $10 billion in the narrowest case to $136 billion at the broad-exposure extreme (Figure 2). The report argues even these are conservative, because antidumping and countervailing duties stack on top of ordinary tariffs — combined exposure can top 90% on aluminum wire and cable and several hundred percent on quartz surface products. For budget perspective, a central $25 billion annual leak exceeds CBP’s entire $23 billion budget and roughly equals the Space Force’s FY 2026 request.

Figure 2. Annual tariff-revenue losses implied by each estimate at 25–45% duty differentials. Source: OTMP report, Table 4.

Jobs, GDP and the tax base

The report then converts transshipment flows into broader economic losses using three rules of thumb: 6,000 U.S. jobs displaced per $1 billion added to the trade deficit, a GDP multiplier of 1.5 to 2.0, and federal receipts at 17% of GDP. The results (Figure 3) run from 240,000 jobs displaced in the narrow case to roughly 450,000 in the central case and more than 1.8 million under broad exposure. A companion set of “ugly sister city” pairings maps foreign staging corridors to the American industrial regions producing the same goods — Mexico’s Guanajuato–Querétaro motor corridor against Detroit and Indianapolis, South Korea’s Gyeonggi semiconductor belt against Phoenix and Austin, Ho Chi Minh City switchgear against Chicago, Milwaukee and Rockford.

Figure 3. Broader annual economic losses under the report’s three cases: jobs displaced (left) and GDP loss ranges (right). Source: OTMP report, Table 6.

The enforcement response

Three tools anchor the response. The Agreements on Reciprocal Trade contain a provision letting signatories set rules of origin to keep benefits from “accruing substantially to third countries.” Executive Order 14411, signed June 3, 2026, tightens importer-of-record requirements, bonding, ownership disclosure and penalties. And CBP is fusing anomaly detection, routing histories, capacity validation and computer vision into the AI “Detective Border.” Early enforcement metrics are already moving: comparing 526-day windows before and after the inauguration, shipments flagged with post-release discrepancies rose 245%, and associated revenue assessments jumped from $9.6 billion to $25.8 billion.

Navarro framed the report as negotiating leverage as much as analysis. “This isn’t about China … This is about the 40-plus countries that are enabling the transshipping,” he told reporters, adding that the issue “is going to be part of the reciprocal trade negotiations.” 

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer struck the same note, calling transshipment “a form of free earning off of President Trump’s deals” that is “perpetuated by bad faith exporters.” Navarro’s summation doubled as the report’s thesis: “This is basically a warning to the world — don’t try to cheat America.”

Caveats and what to watch

The report is more careful than its bombastic title suggests. It concedes that the import-share reallocation in its headline chart does not prove all displaced Chinese trade was illegally transshipped — some reflects legitimate nearshoring and investment. The jobs and GDP figures are model-based scenarios, not observed counts. And the central tension goes unresolved: the 2025 tariff differentials the administration is policing are the very thing that creates the arbitrage incentive. The White House itself says the net effect of its policies cannot yet be measured, since customs data arrive with a lag and key EO provisions are still being implemented. The tells to watch: whether Congress codifies country-of-origin standards now grounded in customs case law, and whether next year’s trade data show transshipment volumes actually falling.

Bottom line

Whatever the true number — $40 billion or $300 billion — the report’s significance is the signal. Transshipment has moved from customs footnote to named policy target, backed by an executive order, origin-rules provisions in the new reciprocal trade agreements and an AI enforcement architecture at CBP. For importers and the 40-plus countries on the list, the compliance bar for country-of-origin claims is rising — and Executive Order 14411 puts the accountability squarely on importers of record, through tighter bonding, ownership disclosure and stiffer penalties.

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY   |   TRADE POLICY  |  TARIFF ENFORCEMENT — THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2026

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY — THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2026   |   PAGE 1