Ag Intel

Trump: Farmers Will Be Happy About Ag Deals, But Gives Few Details

Trump: Farmers Will Be Happy About Ag Deals, But Gives Few Details 

Will take days or weeks before details emerge from Trump/Xi summit

LINKS 

Link: Daines Sees “Boeing, Beef and Beans” Deal Emerging from
         Trump/Xi Summit

Link: Trump/Xi Summit Keeps Taiwan in the Background —
         Publicly, at Least

Link: Video: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, May 9
Link: Audio: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, May 9

Updates: Policy/News/Markets, May 15, 2026
UP FRONT


TOP STORIES
 

— Trade signals still murky after Trump’s Beijing visit: Trivium China said major questions remain unresolved following President Donald Trump’s Beijing summit, including tariffs, rare earth exports, and the proposed U.S./China “Board of Trade,” leaving uncertainty over whether the trip produced meaningful trade stabilization.

— Taiwan emerges as key flashpoint in Trump/Xi talks: Trump said he made no commitments to Xi Jinping on Taiwan and is still weighing a $14 billion arms package for Taipei, underscoring Taiwan’s central role in escalating U.S./China strategic tensions.

— Trump signals limited Iran pressure ask to China: Trump said he did not directly ask Xi to pressure Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz but indicated he expects China to support keeping the waterway open amid renewed geopolitical tensions.

— Ag deal signals emerge from Beijing: Trump and USTR Jamieson Greer pointed to potential multi-billion-dollar Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural products, though traders remain frustrated by the lack of concrete details.

— Soybeans retreat after summit disappointment: Soybean futures fell sharply as traders reacted negatively to the absence of new Chinese soybean buying commitments beyond previously announced agreements.

— ASA pushes for more China soybean buying: The American Soybean Association urged continued progress on Chinese soybean purchases and called for greater long-term trade certainty for U.S. farmers.

— Boeing order questions cloud summit trade wins: Trump cited a major Boeing aircraft purchase agreement with China, but conflicting figures ranging from 200 to 750 aircraft created uncertainty about the scale of the deal.

— Thucydides trap looms over Trump/Xi summit: Analysts warned that despite positive summit optics, deeper strategic rivalry between the U.S. and China over Taiwan, trade, and technology remains unresolved.

— Trump defends Chinese ownership of U.S. farmland: Trump argued restricting Chinese farmland purchases could damage farm values while acknowledging ongoing national security concerns.

— Summit conclusion: Xi pushes ‘new relationship’ framework with Trump: Xi Jinping used the summit to promote a long-term “constructive strategic stability” framework designed to reduce future trade and technology conflicts with Washington.

— Saudi floats regional Iran security framework: Saudi Arabia is reportedly exploring a broader Gulf non-aggression framework with Iran aimed at reducing regional instability and protecting energy infrastructure.

— Cuba’s energy crisis boils over: Severe fuel shortages and rolling blackouts triggered protests in Cuba as officials admitted the country has exhausted diesel and fuel oil reserves.

FINANCIAL MARKETS

— Equities today: Global equity markets and U.S. futures fell sharply as rising Treasury yields, elevated oil prices, and Iran conflict concerns intensified fears of persistent inflation and higher interest rates.

— Treasury yields surge on inflation, Iran war concerns: The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield climbed above 4.5% as investors priced out Fed rate cuts and increasingly considered the possibility of a rate hike later this year.

— Equities yesterday: Major U.S. stock indexes closed higher Thursday, led by gains in the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P 500.

AG ECONOMY

— Tenth district ranchland values surge to record highs: Kansas City Fed data showed ranchland values climbed sharply on strong cattle markets, while crop producers continued facing financial stress from weak grain margins.

AGRIBUSINESS

— Tyson’s beef business under pressure: Tyson Foods said tight cattle supplies continue squeezing beef margins, even as stronger chicken demand helps offset losses.

— Corteva details separation strategy, seed technology push and crop protection outlook: Corteva executives outlined plans to split the company into two businesses while emphasizing gene editing, hybrid wheat, licensing growth, and Brazil expansion.

AG MARKETS

— Grain futures slide overnight on trade, weather pressure: Corn, soybean, and wheat futures moved lower overnight as traders reacted to disappointing summit developments and improving Midwest weather forecasts.

— Global grain markets: International grain and oilseed prices remained firm amid Black Sea uncertainty, weather risks, and ongoing geopolitical disruptions tied to Iran and the Strait of Hormuz.

— USDA sees another strong grain transportation year ahead: USDA projected another year of heavy grain transportation demand as large corn and soybean supplies continue pressuring storage and logistics systems.

— Brazil raises record soybean crop outlook: Brazil’s Conab raised its soybean crop forecast above 180 million metric tons, reinforcing expectations for abundant global soybean supplies.

— Whey boom reshapes dairy markets: Rising demand for whey protein tied to sports nutrition and GLP-1 drugs is reshaping global dairy pricing and processing investments.

— Agriculture markets yesterday: Grain, cotton, and livestock futures broadly declined Thursday, led by steep losses in soybeans and wheat.

YEAR-ROUND E15

— Year-round E15 shows net gains for corn and soybean farmers: An NCGA-backed study said permanent nationwide E15 sales would improve farm returns and reduce government farm program costs.

— E15 economic forecasts diverge sharply over adoption assumptions: Competing E15 studies continue to disagree over future ethanol demand, soybean impacts, and infrastructure growth assumptions.

EPA REGULATIONS

— EPA delays Biden-era vehicle rules: EPA proposed delaying stricter vehicle emissions standards by two years, arguing the original timeline relied on unrealistic electric vehicle adoption expectations.

ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY

— Friday: Oil rally intensifies on Hormuz risks: Brent crude climbed near $109 per barrel as Iran tensions, shipping disruptions, and fading ceasefire hopes pushed oil toward a weekly surge.

— Thursday: Oil market holds firm as Hormuz risks continue to dominate trade: Oil prices stayed elevated as limited tanker traffic resumed through the Strait of Hormuz while broader geopolitical risks remained high.

TRADE POLICY

— House pushes Trump team on China cotton tariffs: Bipartisan lawmakers urged the administration to eliminate China’s cotton tariffs and secure stronger purchase commitments during trade talks.

USDA REORGANIZATION

— Senate Democrats challenge USDA REE reorganization: Senate Democrats led by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) warned USDA’s proposed REE restructuring could weaken research capacity and economic data services.

FOOD AID

— USDA expands Food for Peace funding under ‘America First’ rules: Devex reported USDA’s revamped Food for Peace program now prioritizes U.S. commodities and shipping costs, drawing criticism from aid experts.

LABOR & IMMIGRATION POLICY

— Judge rejects bid to block lower farmworker wages: A federal judge denied an injunction request against revised H-2A wage calculations, allowing lower wage rates for some agricultural jobs to remain in effect.

CONGRESS

— Senate moves to withhold lawmakers’ pay during shutdowns: The Senate approved a resolution delaying senators’ paychecks during future government shutdowns to increase pressure for funding agreements.

WEATHER

— NWS outlook: Severe thunderstorms are expected across Iowa and parts of the Plains while heat builds across the central U.S. and cooler unsettled weather spreads westward.

— Western Corn Belt swings from drought to deluge before returning dry: Heavy storms are forecast to recharge moisture across parts of the Corn Belt and northern Plains before another drier pattern returns later in the month.
 

 TOP STORIESTrade signals still murky after Trump’s Beijing visitTrivium China says key U.S./China trade details remain unresolved as Trump leaves Beijing President Donald Trump departed Beijing on May 15 with few concrete details released on the trade front, leaving markets and policy observers waiting to see whether the summit ultimately delivers any meaningful stabilization in U.S./China commercial relations, according to analysis from Trivium China. So far, neither Washington nor Beijing has provided substantial clarity on several key issues that had been viewed as central objectives of the summit. Analysts are still looking for confirmation on whether the two sides will extend the terms of the Busan trade truce, further roll back tariffs and trade investigations, ease Chinese export restrictions on rare earth minerals destined for the U.S., or formally establish a proposed “Board of Trade” mechanism aimed at managing future bilateral disputes. Trivium China cautioned that it is still too early to declare the trip either a success or a disappointment, noting that some negotiations may have continued until the final hours of the visit and that both governments could still be aligning messaging before announcing agreements publicly. The group pointed out that details surrounding the earlier Busan agreement also emerged gradually in the days following that meeting. Meanwhile, the lack of immediate announcements has heightened scrutiny because trade stabilization was widely viewed as the central economic purpose of Trump’s trip. Trivium argued that despite the positive optics and warm diplomatic tone throughout the visit, the summit risks being viewed as underwhelming if it fails to place U.S./China trade ties on a more durable and predictable footing. Of note: While touring the garden at Zhongnanhai, where China’s top officials live and work, Trump admired the roses and said they were the most beautiful he had ever seen. Xi said he would send Trump some rose seeds for the White House Rose Garden. The firm said a highly successful outcome would ultimately include a multi-year trade ceasefire, suspension or removal of most remaining tariffs and trade probes, additional loosening of China’s rare earth export restrictions, and creation of new bilateral mechanisms to prevent disputes from escalating. The more of those objectives that remain unresolved, Trivium warned, the less impactful the Beijing summit may appear in hindsight.Taiwan emerges as key flashpoint in Trump/Xi talksTrump says no commitments were made on Taiwan as administration weighs $14 billion arms sale to Taipei President Donald Trump said he made no commitments to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Taiwan during their summit in Beijing and indicated he would soon decide whether to move forward with a proposed $14 billion U.S. arms package for the island. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that Xi “feels very strongly” about Taiwan and warned against any move toward independence, which Trump described as risking a “very strong confrontation.” The comments underscored how Taiwan remains the most sensitive geopolitical issue in U.S./China relations, even as both leaders attempted to frame the summit around trade, investment, and commercial agreements. Trump said he would decide on the arms sale “over the next fairly short period” after speaking with “the person that’s running Taiwan,” though he did not specify whom he meant. Chinese officials sharply elevated the rhetoric surrounding the issue during the summit. In a readout released by China’s state-run Xinhua News Agency, Xi warned that Taiwan is “the most important issue in China/U.S. relations” and cautioned that if mishandled, the two countries could face “collision or even clashes,” potentially pushing bilateral relations into a “highly dangerous situation.” Meanwhile, the Trump administration sought to minimize any perception of escalating tensions. Marco Rubio said U.S. policy toward Taiwan remains unchanged and reiterated Washington’s long-standing approach of supporting Taiwan militarily and politically without formally recognizing its sovereignty. Rubio said both sides simply restated positions that have been understood for decades. The debate over the pending arms package now places Trump in a difficult political and diplomatic position. Any effort to halt or significantly scale back the sale would likely trigger bipartisan criticism in Washington, where congressional support for Taiwan remains strong. At the same time, approving the package risks intensifying tensions with Beijing, which has repeatedly condemned U.S. military support for Taipei and demanded assurances that Washington does not back Taiwanese independence. Analysts said Xi’s decision to raise Taiwan so prominently during a summit largely focused on trade and economic cooperation highlighted Beijing’s concerns that improving commercial ties cannot come at the expense of China’s core sovereignty priorities. Craig Singleton of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies said Xi appeared intent on signaling that economic stability in the bilateral relationship depends on Washington handling Taiwan cautiously. The issue is expected to remain central to U.S./China diplomacy ahead of Xi’s planned White House visit in September, which is expected to be the second of four meetings scheduled between the two leaders this year.Trump signals limited Iran pressure ask to ChinaTrump says Xi likely wants Hormuz open, but avoids explicit request President Donald Trump said Friday that he did not directly ask Chinese President Xi Jinping to pressure Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz during their two-day summit in Beijing, though he indicated he believes Xi will move in that direction independently. Speaking aboard Air Force One after departing China, Trump said, “I think he will. I think automatically he’d like to see it opened up,” while adding that he was “not asking for any favors” because such requests create obligations in return.Trump also suggested China could soon make decisions related to sanctions on Iran, saying he expected movement “in a few days.” His remarks came as global markets continued to closely monitor the security situation surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global crude oil and LNG shipments. Meanwhile, Trump hinted that his support for the current Iran ceasefire arrangement may be weakening. He said the U.S. backed the ceasefire “as a request to other nations,” comments that added to investor unease over the durability of the truce and the broader geopolitical outlook in the Gulf region.The comments helped renew market concerns about escalating tensions with Iran, contributing to pressure on U.S. equity futures ahead of Friday trading as investors weighed the risks of further disruptions to global energy supplies.Ag deal signals emerge from BeijingTrump and Greer point to broad China purchase commitments as summit details continue to take shapeSigns are growing that the Trump/Xi summit in Beijing has produced at least the framework for a new agricultural purchase agreement between the U.S. and China, even as many of the final details remain unresolved. President Donald Trump told Fox News that he expects “China will buy a lot of our farm products,” while U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told Bloomberg that China would purchase “double digit billions” of dollars in U.S. agricultural products annually.President Trump on Air Force One told reporters: “The farmers are going to be very happy; China is going to be buying billions of dollars of soybeans.U.S. farmers will be very happy with trade deals with China.” But Trump gave no details on any new purchases.The emerging deal also appears poised to reopen the Chinese market to hundreds of U.S. beef exporters, potentially restoring up to $1 billion in annual trade value after months of uncertainty over market access. Analysts increasingly believe agriculture represented one of the easiest areas for the two sides to reach agreement during the summit, given China’s ongoing food security needs and the political importance of export markets for U.S. farmers. Unlike last October’s soybean-focused agreement, the latest framework may rely more heavily on broader aggregate purchase targets covering multiple commodities rather than specific quotas tied to individual products. Meanwhile, trade observers caution that many of the summit’s deliverables are still being finalized at the working level. Negotiators note that heads of state typically establish broad political direction, while technical details are left to trade officials and companies to complete afterward.  Greer points to potential multi-billion-dollar annual Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural products, though markets continue waiting for concrete summit deliverables U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer signaled that China could commit to “double-digit billions” of dollars in annual purchases of U.S. agricultural products, as markets spent the overnight session parsing comments he made Friday in an interview with Bloomberg Television. Greer pointed to the October White House agreement under which China committed to purchase 25 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans annually for the next three marketing years, while indicating broader agricultural commitments may emerge from President Donald Trump’s visit to Beijing. Greer said he expects “an agreement for double-digit billion purchases of ags over the next three years per year coming out of this visit,” emphasizing that the arrangement would be aggregate in nature and extend beyond soybeans to include a wider range of agricultural commodities. Trump also reinforced those expectations during a Thursday interview with Fox News, saying that “China will buy a lot of our farm products.” Markets had also anticipated additional trade actions tied to the summit, including restoring broader access for U.S. beef exports to the Chinese market and potentially expanding market openings for other agricultural products. However, few concrete details had emerged as of Friday morning. The Trump administration had heavily emphasized the importance of securing tangible “deliverables” from the summit, including expanded Chinese agricultural purchases and the possible establishment of a bilateral “Board of Trade” framework aimed at managing future trade tensions. So far, investors and commodity markets appear to view the publicly disclosed outcomes as falling short of those expectations. Of note: The proposed Board of Trade appears headed toward implementation. The U.S./China body would oversee trade issues in sectors including aviation, energy, medical equipment and agriculture. Greer said the framework would seek tariff reductions on roughly $30 billion worth of goods. Greer also said he expects the tariff truce reached by Washington and Beijing last fall in South Korea to be extended. The coming hours, days, and potentially weeks are critical for determining the full scope of any agreements reached during Trump’s visit to China, particularly as negotiators and industry officials work through the details behind the broad commitments outlined by both governments.
  Bottom Line: The timeline following last October’s trade truce may provide a guide for what comes next. While some initial details emerged quickly, several provisions took days to clarify and months to fully implement. Additional announcements from Greer and other administration officials could still emerge in as both governments continue formalizing the agreements reached in Beijing.Soybeans retreat after summit disappointmentTraders take profits as China demand questions pressure market Soybean futures tumbled nearly 3% Thursday, and slightly lower again Friday, falling back below $12 per bushel after reaching a two-year high of roughly $12.30 on May 13, as traders locked in profits following the bullish USDA WASDE report earlier this week and reacted negatively to the lack of concrete agricultural announcements from the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing.Market participants said the downturn reflected growing disappointment that no additional Chinese soybean purchases were announced beyond Beijing’s existing commitment to purchase 25 million metric tons annually under the current framework agreement. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s earlier comments suggesting that “soybeans are all taken care of” under the existing arrangement also reinforced expectations that no near-term expansion in soybean buying is likely. The decline underscored continuing concerns about China’s shifting soybean sourcing strategy. China has sharply reduced reliance on U.S. soybeans in recent years, instead favoring Brazilian supplies because of lower prices, abundant inventories, and logistical advantages. Traders noted that Brazil’s record soybean production continues to intensify competition for U.S. exporters despite the renewed diplomatic engagement between Washington and Beijing. Meanwhile, longer-term supply fundamentals remain supportive for soybeans. USDA projected U.S. ending soybean stocks for the 2026-27 marketing year at 310 million bushels, down from the 340 million bushels expected at the end of the current season, signaling tighter domestic supplies ahead even as export demand uncertainty persists. USDA data also highlighted the broader deterioration in agricultural trade flows with China. U.S. agricultural exports to China reportedly fell to $8.37 billion last year from $24.41 billion in 2024, reflecting the combined effects of trade tensions, shifting global supply chains, and China’s growing dependence on South American agricultural imports. ASA pushes for more China soybean buyingSoybean growers seek market certainty as Trump/Xi trade talks continue The American Soybean Association (ASA) on Thursday welcomed President Donald Trump’s ongoing trade discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping, while urging continued progress on soybean purchase commitments and stronger long-term market certainty for U.S. farmers. In a statement released from Washington, ASA said China remains one of the most important export markets for U.S. soybeans and emphasized that dependable trade relationships are critical as growers plant the 2026 crop. The comments come amid heightened attention on agricultural trade commitments tied to the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing and broader efforts to stabilize U.S.-China trade relations. Quotes of note. “ASA appreciates the ongoing dialogue between the United States and China and hopes to see additional soybean purchases this marketing year, as well as continued progress toward fulfilling future purchase commitments,” said ASA President Scott Metzger, an Ohio soybean farmer. “As U.S. soybean farmers plant our 2026 crop, we are looking forward to a successful harvest to fulfill China’s purchase commitments. Greater certainty and consistency in the marketplace help provide farmers with the confidence they need as they make decisions for the year ahead.” ASA highlighted that, during the previous trade summit between the two countries, China committed to purchase 25 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans annually through 2028, up from the current marketing year commitment of 12 MMT. Market participants have been closely monitoring whether additional agricultural buying agreements or enforcement mechanisms could emerge from the current round of U.S.-China talks. The group also reiterated that U.S. soybean growers remain committed to supplying reliable, high-quality soybeans to global customers and said future trade policies should focus on strengthening export demand, improving competitiveness, and supporting long-term growth across American agriculture. Boeing order questions cloud Summit trade winsTrump highlights major aircraft commitment from China, but conflicting figures create uncertainty President Donald Trump said China agreed to purchase aircraft from Boeing as part of the broader U.S./China summit in Beijing, though conflicting figures surrounding the size of the deal have created uncertainty over the scope of the commitment. Trump initially said China would purchase 200 Boeing jets, describing the agreement as a major manufacturing and export victory for the United States. He later suggested Boeing had received a promise tied to as many as 750 aircraft, fueling confusion after earlier media reports had pointed to potential orders ranging from 200 to more than 500 planes. The discrepancy appears to reflect the difference between firm near-term purchases and broader long-term discussions that may include options, phased deliveries, or future framework agreements. Aviation analysts noted large Chinese aircraft deals are often structured over many years and can evolve as trade negotiations continue. Ahead of the summit, investors and industry observers had anticipated a much larger agreement, with some reports suggesting China was considering orders exceeding 500 aircraft. Markets reacted negatively after Trump publicly referenced the smaller 200-plane figure, with concerns the final deal may have fallen short of expectations. Meanwhile, the aircraft discussions fit into a broader effort by Washington and Beijing to stabilize economic relations through large commercial purchase agreements spanning aviation, agriculture, energy, and technology. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has also indicated China could purchase “double digit billions” of dollars annually in U.S. agricultural products as part of the evolving trade framework. Despite the uncertainty surrounding the final aircraft totals, any substantial Boeing order would represent a major boost for the company, which has faced years of delivery disruptions, regulatory scrutiny, and reduced Chinese market access during earlier trade tensions. Boeing had been mostly shut out of China’s market since 2017 – the purchase deal could serve as a floor, rather than a ceiling, for purchases. China remains one of the world’s largest aviation growth markets, making renewed Boeing sales strategically important for both the company and the Trump administration’s export agenda.Thucydides trap looms over Trump/Xi summitDespite warm rhetoric and ceremonial diplomacy in Beijing, analysts warn that the deeper strategic rivalry between the U.S. and China still risks long-term confrontation. As President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping projected optimism and personal rapport during their summit in Beijing, analysts continue to warn about the so-called “Thucydides Trap” — the historical theory that conflict often emerges when a rising power challenges an established global power. The concept, drawn from the writings of ancient Greek historian Thucydides, has increasingly been used to frame the modern U.S./China relationship. Structural tensions. While both leaders emphasized cooperation, trade stability, and mutual respect during the summit, some analysts note the structural tensions between Washington and Beijing remain unresolved. Taiwan continues to represent the most sensitive geopolitical flashpoint, with Chinese officials warning that mishandling the issue could create an “extremely dangerous situation.” Meanwhile, disputes over technology, military influence in the Indo-Pacific, trade imbalances, and supply chain dominance continue simmering beneath the summit’s cordial atmosphere. Trump’s approach has combined public praise for Xi with continued pressure on trade, manufacturing, and strategic competition. Beijing, meanwhile, appears eager to stabilize relations temporarily amid economic pressures at home while still asserting its long-term global ambitions.Upshot: Analysts caution that ceremonial diplomacy and economic agreements may ease tensions in the short term, but the underlying competition between the world’s two largest economies remains deeply entrenched — raising questions about whether the relationship can avoid the historical pattern of rivalry escalating into confrontation. Trump defends Chinese ownership of U.S. farmlandPresident says restricting Chinese land purchases could hurt farm values, while acknowledging security concerns President Donald Trump defended the long-standing practice of Chinese nationals purchasing U.S. farmland during an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity while visiting China, arguing that abruptly restricting those purchases could negatively impact U.S. farmers and land values. Trump said he does not “love” the situation but warned that removing Chinese buyers from the market could pressure farmland prices and financially hurt producers.Trump also criticized former President Barack Obama, claiming large amounts of farmland were acquired by Chinese buyers during the Obama administration without intervention. The comments come as Congress and several states continue pushing legislation aimed at restricting foreign ownership of agricultural land, particularly by Chinese entities, over national security and food security concerns. Meanwhile, Trump also defended allowing Chinese students to attend U.S. universities, saying educational exchanges benefit the United States and warning that barring Chinese students would financially damage many smaller colleges and universities. He said exposure to American culture can be positive and called broad restrictions on Chinese students “insulting.” Summit conclusion: Xi pushes ‘new relationship’ framework with TrumpBloomberg reports Xi Jinping used the Beijing summit to promote a long-term “constructive strategic stability” framework aimed at reshaping U.S./China relations and limiting future trade and technology conflicts. Chinese President Xi Jinping moved aggressively to frame President Donald Trump’s Beijing visit as the beginning of a new era in U.S./China relations, despite the absence of major trade breakthroughs or formal agreements. Xi described the summit as “historic” and unveiled a new diplomatic concept centered on “constructive strategic stability,” a framework Chinese officials suggested should guide bilateral ties for at least the remainder of Trump’s presidency. Analysts cited by Bloomberg said the language gives Beijing a strategic narrative advantage by allowing China to accuse Washington of acting in “bad faith” if tensions reemerge over trade, Taiwan, or technology restrictions. The framework appears designed to preserve the gains China secured following the October trade truce while reducing the likelihood of surprise U.S. sanctions or export controls. Taiwan remained a major point of tension throughout the meetings. Xi reportedly warned Trump that U.S. support for Taiwan independence could trigger a direct “clash” between the two powers. Trump later said he remained undecided on a pending $14 billion arms package for Taipei and would make a determination “over the next fairly short period.” The summit also underscored China’s growing leverage in strategic industries, particularly rare earth minerals critical to U.S. manufacturing and advanced technologies. Bloomberg noted Beijing views the current environment as favorable for stabilizing ties while it continues working to narrow the technological gap with the U.S. in artificial intelligence and semiconductor development. Trump struck a notably warm tone toward Xi during the visit, praising him as a “tremendous” leader and suggesting the two countries could operate as a new “G2.” Meanwhile, some geopolitical analysts argued the optics of the summit favored Beijing, with Xi appearing more assertive and strategically positioned than the U.S. delegation. Many analysts and investors appeared disappointed by the lack of concrete details or major breakthroughs on issues such as tariffs, Iran, and technology restrictions, with the summit falling short of already lowered expectations. For the 17 business leaders who accompanied President Donald Trump on the trip, the commercial outcomes also appeared far more limited than the slate of deals announced during Trump’s 2017 visit to China. Meanwhile, Trump is coming home to rising oil prices and a slumping bond market. Saudi floats regional Iran security frameworkRiyadh explores post-war non-aggression arrangement aimed at stabilizing Gulf security and preventing a wider regional conflict Saudi Arabia is quietly floating the idea of a broader Middle Eastern non-aggression pact involving Iran as Gulf states prepare for the geopolitical aftermath of the ongoing U.S./Israeli conflict with Tehran, according to an exclusive report from the Financial Times. The proposal reflects growing concern among Arab governments that even if active military operations ease, the region could face years of instability, proxy conflict, and threats to critical energy infrastructure. The discussions reportedly involve Saudi officials and regional allies examining whether a formal or semi-formal security understanding with Iran could reduce the risk of direct attacks, maritime disruptions, and retaliatory escalation across the Gulf. Diplomats cited by the Financial Times said the concept remains preliminary, but the fact it is being discussed underscores how dramatically regional calculations have shifted since the war began. The initiative also highlights Saudi Arabia’s increasingly pragmatic approach toward Iran under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Riyadh has spent the past several years attempting to reduce direct confrontation with Tehran after earlier periods of intense rivalry that included attacks on Saudi oil facilities, proxy conflicts in Yemen, and maritime security threats in the Persian Gulf. China-brokered normalization talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran in 2023 reopened diplomatic channels, and Gulf states now appear eager to avoid becoming trapped in a prolonged regional war tied to U.S./Iran tensions. Energy security remains central to the discussions. Gulf governments remain deeply concerned about the Strait of Hormuz, which handles a major share of global crude oil and LNG shipments. Any prolonged instability or renewed attacks on shipping infrastructure could further tighten already strained global energy supplies and intensify inflationary pressures worldwide. Saudi Arabia and neighboring Gulf producers are also wary that a weakened or cornered Iran could increasingly rely on asymmetric retaliation through regional militias or maritime disruption. Meanwhile, the proposal reflects broader uncertainty over what the post-conflict regional order may look like. Arab states have publicly supported de-escalation while privately attempting to preserve relations with both Washington and Tehran. A non-aggression framework could potentially serve as a mechanism for crisis communication, maritime coordination, and limits on proxy escalation, though major political and sectarian divisions would make any formal agreement difficult to achieve. Bottom Line: The Financial Times noted that regional officials increasingly fear that even if military operations eventually end, the underlying confrontation between Iran, Israel, and the United States may persist through sanctions battles, covert operations, cyberattacks, and proxy warfare. For Saudi Arabia, the discussions appear aimed less at forging a strategic alliance with Iran and more at creating guardrails to prevent another full-scale regional shock. Cuba’s energy crisis boils overFuel shortages and rolling blackouts trigger protests in Havana as officials admit the island has exhausted diesel and fuel oil reserves The Financial Times reported that Cuba has effectively run out of diesel and fuel oil, marking a dramatic escalation in the island’s long-running economic and energy crisis. Energy Minister Vicente de la O Levy acknowledged the country has “absolutely no” reserves remaining, prompting protests across Havana and intensifying nationwide blackouts that in some regions now last up to 22 hours per day.  According to the FT, the crisis stems from a near-total collapse in imported fuel supplies following tighter U.S. sanctions and pressure on countries and companies shipping oil to Cuba. President Donald Trump’s administration expanded restrictions earlier this year, discouraging traditional suppliers such as Venezuela and Mexico from continuing shipments to the island. Cuba reportedly now produces only about 40% of its domestic energy needs and has struggled to secure replacement cargoes, despite limited Russian deliveries and Chinese solar assistance. Reuters and other reports said the shortages have crippled transportation, garbage collection, hospitals, food distribution systems, and tourism operations. Protesters in Havana blocked roads and demanded electricity restoration as frustration mounted over repeated outages and deteriorating living conditions. The demonstrations were among the largest tied to the current energy emergency. The broader implications extend beyond Cuba itself. The crisis highlights how energy supply disruptions, sanctions policy, and elevated global oil prices tied to Middle East tensions are reshaping fragile economies dependent on imported fuel. Cuba’s government continues searching for emergency suppliers while attempting limited market liberalization measures, including loosening controls on fuel pricing and private imports. 
FINANCIAL MARKETS


Equities today: U.S. equity futures are sharply lower as rising Treasury yields and inflation concerns pressure stocks following the Trump/Xi summit.Global equities declined as investors became increasingly uneasy about the economic fallout from the prolonged Iran conflict, particularly fears that rising energy prices could intensify inflationary pressures and keep interest rates higher for longer.

Trump’s suggestion that the U.S. does not need the Strait of Hormuz to remain open “at all” — following a series of discussions with President Xi Jinping that yielded little apparent support for U.S. Gulf-region objectives — added further upward pressure to global crude prices. The comments helped extend this week’s rally to roughly 9%, with the impact rippling across markets in Asia and Europe.

U.S. Treasury yields climbed to their highest levels in nearly a year during overnight trading, tracking a broader global fixed-income selloff driven by mounting inflation concerns, elevated crude oil prices, and disappointment over the lack of major breakthroughs at President Donald Trump’s two-day summit in China. If Treasury bond yields extend their upward climb, analysts say it will be difficult for stocks to resume their pace of second-quarter gains.

In Asia, Japan -2%. Hong Kong -1.6%. China -1%. India -0.2%.

In Europe, at midday, London -1.5%. Paris -1.6%. Frankfurt -1.7%.

Treasury yields surge on inflation, Iran war concerns

Markets price out Fed cuts as inflation pressures intensify

The yield on the benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury note climbed above 4.5% on Friday, reaching its highest level in nearly a year as investors reacted to mounting inflation pressures tied to the Iran war and growing expectations that the Federal Reserve may need to raise interest rates later this year. The move reflected a broad selloff in global fixed-income markets as traders reassessed the outlook for inflation, monetary policy, and geopolitical risk.

Economic data released earlier this week reinforced those concerns. U.S. wholesale inflation accelerated in April at its fastest pace since 2022, while consumer prices posted their largest increase since 2023, driven in part by higher energy costs linked to the Middle East conflict and disruptions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

Meanwhile, retail sales growth slowed in line with expectations but continued to point to resilient consumer demand despite elevated borrowing costs and persistent inflation pressures.

Markets have now fully priced out any Federal Reserve rate cuts for 2026, with some traders increasingly positioning for the possibility of a rate hike by December if inflation continues to accelerate. Higher crude oil prices and concerns over sustained energy supply disruptions have added to fears that inflation could remain elevated longer than previously expected.

Investors were also closely monitoring the second day of high-level talks between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, with markets looking for signs of progress on trade, energy security, and broader geopolitical tensions.

Equities yesterday: 

Equity
Index
Closing Price 
May 14
Point Difference 
from May 13
% Difference 
from May 13
Dow50,063.46+370.26+0.75%
Nasdaq26,635.22+232.88+0.88%
S&P 5007,501.24+56.99+0.77%
AG ECONOMY 

Tenth district ranchland values surge to record highs

Federal Reserve survey shows cattle strength boosting land markets while crop-sector stress persists

A new report (link) by Ty Kreitman for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City said ranchland values across the Tenth Federal Reserve District climbed sharply in the first quarter of 2026, driven by continued strength in the cattle sector, while crop producers continued to face narrow profit margins and elevated financial pressure. The Federal Reserve survey found ranchland values rose nearly 11% from a year earlier to record highs, while cropland values posted modest gains after stabilizing over the past year. 

The report noted that strong cattle revenues, government assistance payments, and historically high farmland values continued to support the broader farm economy despite ongoing weakness in grain production margins. Lenders also reported that lower farm loan interest rates and Farmer Bridge Assistance program payments helped stabilize credit conditions.

According to the survey, non-irrigated cropland values increased about 2.5% year-over-year, while irrigated cropland values rose roughly 4%. Ranchland cash rents also hit new highs, climbing about 2%, although cropland rents softened by roughly 1.5%.

The Federal Reserve survey also showed gradual deterioration in farm finances continued across much of the District. Loan demand remained elevated, repayment rates weakened modestly, and many producers continued to carry higher operating debt following several years of tight crop margins. Roughly 20% of borrowers were reported to have increased carryover debt compared to a year earlier.

Bankers surveyed across Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, and Oklahoma repeatedly pointed to the divide between livestock and grain operations. Several lenders warned that grain farmers could face “serious trouble” without stronger commodity prices or lower input costs, while diversified operations with cattle exposure generally remained profitable.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District includes Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Colorado, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

AGRIBUSINESS

Tyson’s beef business under pressure

FoodNavigator-USA reports tight cattle supplies continue squeezing margins as Tyson cuts capacity and consumers shift to cheaper proteins.

According to FoodNavigator-USA, Tyson Foods’ beef business remains under severe pressure from historically tight U.S. cattle supplies, forcing the company to reduce production capacity, close facilities, and absorb rising livestock costs even as retail beef prices remain elevated. Tyson executives said the current cattle cycle — with the U.S. herd at a 75-year low — continues to limit available animals for slaughter, while higher beef prices are beginning to push cost-conscious consumers toward chicken and pork alternatives.

Tyson reported beef volumes declined 13.1% during the quarter while average beef prices increased 11.5%, reflecting efforts to offset sharply higher cattle procurement costs. Company officials said the second quarter represented a “transitional” period as Tyson adjusted its operational footprint to align with lower cattle availability. Tyson has already closed its Lexington, Neb., beef plant and reduced operations in Amarillo, Texas, moves tied directly to the prolonged supply shortage.

The supply squeeze stems from years of drought, high feed costs, and ranchers liquidating cattle rather than retaining heifers for herd rebuilding. Reuters reported cattle inventories have fallen to their lowest level in roughly 75 years, contributing to beef price inflation that has significantly outpaced broader food inflation. Tyson CFO Curt Calaway described herd rebuilding efforts as “spotty and regional,” suggesting relief may still be years away.

Meanwhile, Tyson’s chicken segment has emerged as the company’s primary earnings driver as consumers increasingly trade down to lower-cost proteins. Reuters and MarketWatch reported Tyson’s poultry business posted strong margins and helped offset steep losses in beef operations. Tyson still expects its beef segment to post substantial operating losses in fiscal 2026 despite broader company earnings improvements.

Corteva details separation strategy, seed technology push and crop protection outlook

Executives outline breakup timeline, gene-editing ambitions, Brazil growth plans and crop protection recovery at BMO conference

At the 21st Annual Global Farm to Market Conference hosted by BMO Capital Markets, Corteva Inc. executives laid out an expansive vision for the company’s future as it prepares to separate into two standalone businesses later this year. The discussion featured Corteva CEO Charles Magro and Executive Vice President and CFO David Johnson, with questions led by Joel Jackson of BMO Capital Markets Equity Research. Executives addressed the separation process, global crop conditions, Brazil expansion plans, gene-editing technology, hybrid wheat development, crop protection pricing dynamics and broader industry consolidation trends.

Strong start to 2026 and agricultural outlook

Magro opened the discussion by describing a stronger-than-expected start to 2026, noting that Corteva delivered double-digit growth across both its seed and crop protection businesses during the first quarter. He said demand for grain and oilseed crops remains solid globally, with biofuel demand expected to reach another record in 2026 after already setting records in 2025. Higher crop prices have modestly improved farm economics, while demand for premium seed technology has remained extremely strong. Magro pointed to the company’s top-performing corn hybrids being completely sold out this spring as evidence that growers continue prioritizing productivity and yield despite elevated input costs. He added that Corteva maintained its full-year guidance of roughly $4.1 billion and remains comfortable with that outlook.

The executives also discussed current agricultural market conditions and acreage expectations for 2026. Magro said Corteva expects approximately 95 million acres of corn and 85 million acres of soybeans to be planted in the United States this season. While higher energy prices tied to Middle East tensions have increased fertilizer and fuel costs, he said most U.S. farmers had already secured fertilizer supplies before the recent escalation in energy markets. However, Magro said Latin America remains an important area to monitor because elevated energy prices could eventually alter crop economics and acreage decisions there, particularly for Brazil’s safrinha corn crop.

Separation into Vylor and New Corteva

A major portion of the conversation focused on Corteva’s planned separation into two independent companies — the seed and genetics company Vylor and the remaining crop protection-focused Corteva. Magro stressed that management views the move as a “separation” rather than a “breakup,” joking that “we still like each other.” He argued that the crop protection and seed businesses are increasingly diverging strategically as agriculture evolves toward more open technology systems and collaborative development models. According to Magro, both crop protection chemistry and biotechnology now require enormous development costs and long regulatory timelines, creating incentives for companies to collaborate more broadly to reduce risk and accelerate innovation. He said the separation would allow both companies to pursue more partnerships and unlock additional opportunities that are more difficult to execute under a combined structure.

Executives said the separation remains on schedule for completion during the fourth quarter of 2026. Magro noted that Corteva has already filed its initial Form 10 with the SEC, appointed Luke Kissam as CEO of New Corteva, established executive leadership teams, selected headquarters locations and unveiled the Vylor name for the seed business. He said the process has proceeded smoothly so far without major complications.

Johnson addressed concerns from investors about the financial costs of separating the businesses. He said Corteva initially estimated roughly $100 million in net dis-synergies from the transaction, but management now believes the actual figure may trend somewhat lower. Johnson explained that the seed and crop protection businesses already function largely independently, with separate ERP systems and manufacturing infrastructure already in place. He added that both companies are expected to emerge from the separation with investment-grade balance sheets and strong free cash flow generation.

Brazil and Latin America growth strategy

Brazil and Latin America emerged repeatedly as one of Corteva’s most important long-term growth opportunities. Magro acknowledged that Corteva remains underrepresented in the Latin American soybean market relative to its positions in other major seed markets globally. He said the company is aggressively expanding rollout of its Conkesta E3 soybean technology platform in the region and expects 2026 to mark the first year the technology surpasses double-digit market penetration in Latin America. Corteva ultimately hopes to capture roughly one-third of the Brazilian soybean market by the end of the decade.

The company also expects modest pricing increases for Brazilian corn technology while soybean seed pricing is expected to remain roughly flat to slightly higher year-over-year. Magro said Corteva’s order book in Brazil remains strong despite concerns about input inflation and elevated energy prices.

Crop protection recovery and generic pricing trends

The conversation also turned toward the global crop protection market, which has faced several difficult years amid generic oversupply and pricing pressure. Magro said rising energy prices are beginning to lift costs for crop protection actives, especially from Chinese suppliers shipping into Brazil. While Corteva expects approximately a $20 million crop protection headwind during the second half of 2026 from those higher costs, Magro suggested the tighter supply environment could eventually help stabilize pricing across the industry. He said management originally expected 2026 to represent a recovery year driven mainly by higher volumes while pricing remained weak, but recent developments may improve the pricing outlook sooner than anticipated.

Johnson added that new crop protection products posted roughly 20% growth during the first quarter and that pricing for newer technologies remains stable to slightly positive. He said those trends reflect growers’ continued willingness to pay for differentiated technologies that improve productivity.

Licensing expansion and Bayer agreement

Executives also highlighted seed licensing as a major long-term earnings opportunity for Vylor. Magro said the corn and soybean licensing market across the Americas represents an approximately $4 billion addressable market. Corteva expects to generate roughly $1 billion in net licensing revenue over the next decade, helped in part by its recently finalized agreement with Bayer AG. The agreement gives Corteva earlier access to lucrative triple-stack corn trait markets combining herbicide tolerance with above-ground and below-ground insect protection. Magro said demand currently exceeds supply as Corteva works to expand parent seed production for more than 100 U.S. licensees.

Magro added that 2026 will mark the first year Corteva becomes “royalty positive,” which management views as a major milestone for the licensing platform.

Gene editing and future seed technology

One of the most forward-looking parts of the fireside chat centered on gene-editing technology and Corteva’s broader seed innovation strategy. Magro argued that gene editing could ultimately prove more transformative than biotechnology was 25 years ago. He said the technology has the potential to dramatically improve yields, disease resistance, insect resistance and nutritional characteristics while also reducing chemical applications. Corteva plans to commercialize a gene-edited “disease super locus” corn hybrid in 2028, which Magro described as a major step toward embedding extensive disease resistance directly into crop genetics.

Magro also said gene editing could fundamentally reshape how seed technology is valued and priced. He explained that traditional seed pricing models are built around incremental yield improvements, but future gene-edited products may deliver far broader economic benefits by eliminating fungicide sprays, improving crop oil content for biofuels and opening entirely new revenue streams for growers. He framed the technology not only as a business opportunity, but also as a major advancement for global food security.

Hybrid wheat development

Another major technology initiative discussed during the session was Corteva’s push into hybrid wheat. Magro said the company plans a limited U.S. launch in 2027 using a newly patented hybrid wheat production system that Corteva believes finally solves the economic challenges that historically prevented hybrid wheat from gaining traction commercially. According to Magro, early hybrid wheat varieties are showing yield improvements of 10% to 15%, with further gains expected as breeding programs mature. He said the economics now work because Corteva’s proprietary production system significantly lowers seed production costs, allowing farmers to achieve attractive returns from the higher-yielding seed.

Magro emphasized the global implications of hybrid wheat technology, noting that wheat remains the world’s largest row crop and accounts for approximately 20% of humanity’s caloric intake. He argued that improving wheat productivity could have major implications for food security, especially in more vulnerable regions of the world.

Industry consolidation and M&A outlook

Toward the end of the session, Jackson questioned executives about broader consolidation trends across the agricultural input sector, referencing strategic reviews and restructuring efforts occurring at multiple major agribusiness firms. Magro responded that New Corteva will emerge with strong margins, significant free cash flow and a multibillion-dollar crop protection pipeline that includes seven new active ingredients expected to launch over the next decade alongside an expanding biologicals portfolio. While he said organic growth remains the primary focus, Magro acknowledged the company would possess the financial flexibility to participate in acquisitions or consolidation opportunities if attractive assets become available.

Throughout the conversation, both executives repeatedly emphasized that innovation, collaboration and productivity gains for growers remain the core strategic themes driving Corteva’s future direction as the company prepares to enter its next phase as two independent agricultural technology businesses.

AG MARKETS

Grain futures slide overnight on trade, weather pressure

Soybeans and wheat lead declines as traders weigh Trump/Xi summit fallout, improving Midwest moisture outlook, and broader macroeconomic uncertainty

Overnight grain markets traded sharply lower across most major contracts as traders continued to digest limited agricultural detail emerging from the summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, while favorable weather forecasts across portions of the Corn Belt added additional pressure to prices.

July corn futures fell 5 3/4 cents to $4.61 3/4 per bushel, with the market pressured by improving rainfall prospects across parts of the western Corn Belt and ongoing long liquidation ahead of the weekend. Traders also continued to monitor export competitiveness and broader macroeconomic sentiment as outside markets remained volatile due to rising crude oil prices and geopolitical tensions tied to the Iran conflict.

The soybean complex led the overnight weakness. July soybeans dropped 12 1/4 cents to $11.80 1/4 per bushel as market participants expressed disappointment over the lack of concrete new Chinese purchase announcements following the Trump/Xi meetings in Beijing. While U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer indicated China could commit to “double-digit billions” in U.S. agricultural purchases annually, traders appeared to want more specific details regarding soybean commitments and implementation timelines.

July soybean meal futures declined $2.40 to $330.10 per short ton, following weakness in soybeans and continued uncertainty surrounding Chinese feed demand. July soybean oil futures slipped 8 points to 73.58 cents per pound, though losses there were comparatively limited as strength in global crude oil markets continued to provide underlying support to vegetable oil values.

Wheat futures posted some of the steepest declines overnight amid improving harvest expectations and ongoing pressure from global competition. July Chicago soft red winter wheat futures fell 10 cents to $6.48 per bushel, while July Kansas City hard red winter wheat futures dropped 11 cents to $6.94 1/4. Forecasts calling for periodic rains across portions of the Plains improved near-term production expectations in some areas, although drought concerns remain in western Kansas and portions of the southern Plains.

Markets also continued monitoring outside financial markets, where rising Treasury yields and elevated energy prices reinforced concerns that inflation pressures could remain sticky, potentially limiting the likelihood of Federal Reserve rate cuts later this year.

Global grain markets

International wheat, corn and oilseed prices remain firm amid weather concerns, Black Sea uncertainty and ongoing geopolitical risk tied to the Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz shipping disruptions 

European milling wheat futures on Euronext (MATIF) were trading near €216/metric ton for September 2026 delivery as of Friday, equivalent to roughly $242/metric ton or about $6.59/bushel U.S. equivalent. Russian 12.5% protein milling wheat FOB values were assessed around $240-$242/metric ton, while U.S. Gulf SRW wheat export values were near $246-$250/metric ton FOB.

Black Sea corn FOB values were near $201-$204/metric ton, while U.S. Gulf corn export prices were quoted around $220-$221/metric ton FOB. That places Black Sea corn at roughly $5.10/bushel U.S. equivalent versus about $5.60/bushel at the Gulf. Argentina FOB corn values were reported near $210/metric ton.

Chinese Dalian corn and soybean markets were mixed overnight as traders monitored potential U.S.-China agricultural purchase agreements following the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing. Soybean futures globally remained under pressure from expectations for large South American supplies despite renewed Chinese buying interest in U.S. agricultural products.

Malaysian palm oil prices remained elevated near 4,420 ringgit/metric ton, equivalent to roughly $1,015/metric ton, supported by tight edible oil supplies and continued concerns about freight disruptions in the Middle East. That compares with U.S. soybean oil futures near 75 cents/lb, or approximately $1,653/metric ton equivalent.

International Grain Prices and U.S. Equivalency

CommodityInternational PriceU.S. Price Equivalency
Euronext (MATIF) Milling Wheat€216/MT~$6.59/bu
Russian FOB Wheat (12.5%)$240-$242/MT~$6.53-$6.59/bu
Black Sea Corn FOB$201-$204/MT~$5.10-$5.18/bu
Argentina Corn FOB~$210/MT~$5.33/bu
U.S. Gulf Corn FOB~$220-$221/MT~$5.59-$5.61/bu
Malaysian Palm Oil~4,420 ringgit/MT~$1,015/MT
U.S. Soybean Oil~75 cents/lb~$1,653/MT

Sources: European Commission grain dashboard, USDA FAS market data, and international commodity market reporting.

USDA sees another strong grain transportation year ahead

USDA projects large corn and soybean crops for MY 2026/27, keeping pressure on rail, barge, truck, and export logistics despite slightly lower overall grain supplies from record 2025/26 levels.

According to USDA’s latest World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates highlighted in USDA’s Grain Transportation Report, U.S. grain transportation demand is expected to remain strong in marketing year 2026/27 as large corn and soybean supplies continue to strain storage and shipping systems during harvest. USDA projected production at 16.0 billion bushels of corn, 4.4 billion bushels of soybeans, and 1.6 billion bushels of wheat. Corn production was raised from USDA’s February outlook, while wheat production was lowered sharply and would mark the smallest wheat crop since 1972 if realized.

Combined corn, soybean, and wheat production is projected at 22.0 billion bushels, roughly 5% below last year’s record output but generally in line with the prior three-year average. USDA noted that corn and soybean supplies available this fall — including beginning stocks and new production — are projected at 22.9 billion bushels, only 2.6 billion bushels below total available grain storage capacity as of December 2025.

That relatively tight storage cushion suggests continued heavy reliance on transportation networks to move grain quickly during harvest. USDA said the projected storage surplus is slightly larger than last year’s but remains well below the recent three-year average, implying continued above-average pressure on railroads, barges, trucks, and export terminals during peak shipping periods.

USDA’s Grain Transportation Report concluded that transportation demand in MY 2026/27 should remain robust, although likely below the record-setting pace seen in MY 2025/26.

Brazil raises record soybean crop outlook

Conab sees 2025-26 production climbing above 180 MMT as global supply competition intensifies

Brazil’s government crop agency, Conab, raised its forecast for the country’s 2025-26 soybean harvest to a record 180.1 million metric tons, up from its prior estimate of 179.15 MMT, reinforcing expectations for another year of massive global soybean supplies. The revised projection further solidifies Brazil’s position as the world’s largest soybean producer and exporter at a time when global oilseed markets are closely watching Chinese demand, U.S./China trade negotiations, and expanding South American production capacity.

The larger crop estimate reflects favorable early-season conditions, continued acreage expansion, and improving yield expectations across major producing states. The outlook adds additional pressure to global soybean prices, particularly as traders remain uncertain whether China will make soybean purchases beyond previously discussed commitments under ongoing U.S./China trade arrangements.

Meanwhile, the prospect of another record Brazilian crop underscores intensifying export competition for U.S. soybeans during the 2026-27 marketing year. Brazil has continued to benefit from infrastructure improvements, competitive currency dynamics, and strong Chinese demand, allowing it to steadily expand market share in recent years.

Analysts also note that a crop above 180 MMT would provide Brazil with substantial exportable supplies well into 2027, potentially limiting upside price momentum in Chicago soybean futures unless weather threats emerge in the U.S. growing season.

Whey boom reshapes dairy markets

Protein demand drives new volatility across butter, cheese and milk prices

Heavy investment in cheese and whey processing is reshaping global dairy commodity markets as soaring demand for high-protein nutrition products redirects milk flows and changes pricing dynamics across the sector, according to reporting by Teodora Lyubomirova for FoodNavigator-USA and DairyReporter. Analysts say whey protein — once treated largely as a low-value cheese byproduct — has become one of dairy’s most valuable ingredients amid booming consumer demand tied to sports nutrition, wellness trends and GLP-1 weight-loss drugs.

The shift is pressuring traditional dairy commodities, particularly butter. Strong milk production and expanding whey-processing capacity have contributed to larger butter inventories and increased price volatility. Analysts cited in the report said more milk is increasingly being directed into cheese and whey production, leaving butter and milk powder markets more exposed to swings in supply and demand.

Cheese markets, meanwhile, have remained more resilient because global cheese consumption continues to expand both in volume and value. Processors are aggressively investing in cheese plants because whey extraction significantly improves margins, especially as whey protein concentrate and isolate prices have surged to record highs globally.

Industry analysts say demand for functional nutrition products — including ready-to-drink protein beverages, high-protein yogurts and supplements — is accelerating the transition. Reuters recently reported whey protein concentrate prices have climbed nearly 90% over the past year, driven in part by consumers using GLP-1 medications who are seeking higher protein intake to preserve muscle mass during weight loss.

The changing economics are also triggering major global investments in dairy processing infrastructure. Companies including Arla Foods, FrieslandCampina and Dairy Farmers of America are expanding whey and protein-processing operations to capture growing demand for premium dairy ingredients.

Agriculture markets yesterday:

CommodityContract 
Month
Closing Price
May 14
Difference from 
May 13
CornJuly$4.67 1/2-13 1/4 cents
SoybeansJuly$11.92 1/2-36 1/2 cents
Soybean MealJuly$332.50-$6.00
Soybean OilJuly73.66 cents-66 points
SRW WheatJuly$6.58-17 1/2 cents
HRW WheatJuly$7.05 1/4-19 1/2 cents
Spring WheatSeptember$7.23-17 3/4 cents
CottonJuly83.94 cents-287 points
Live CattleJune$252.075-$0.725
Feeder CattleAugust$358.00-$2.925
Lean HogsJune$99.525-$1.35
YEAR-ROUND E15

Year-round E15 shows net gains for corn and soybean farmers

NCGA-backed analysis says expanded E15 demand could strengthen crop returns while lowering government farm program costs

The National Corn Growers Association said a new economic analysis (link) shows year-round nationwide E15 sales would provide a net positive financial benefit for farmers who grow both corn and soybeans, while also reducing federal farm program outlays. 

The study, prepared for NCGA by World Agricultural Economic and Environmental Services, comes as legislation authorizing permanent year-round E15 sales moves to the U.S. Senate for consideration.

According to the analysis, a representative farm with equal corn and soybean acreage would realize an average net gain of more than $5 per acre over the projection period. The report said expanded E15 availability would increase corn demand, provide positive support for corn prices, reduce Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage (ARC/PLC) payments, and improve combined net returns across both crops.

The study incorporated updated Renewable Fuel Standard volume assumptions along with revised industry expectations for E15 market adoption rates. NCGA argued the findings reinforce the case that broader E15 access would deliver market-based support for rural economies at a time when many producers are operating under tight financial margins.

Meanwhile, the report also emphasized potential taxpayer savings through lower ARC/PLC program expenditures as stronger corn demand and improved pricing reduce the need for government support payments. NCGA framed the proposal as both an agricultural growth policy and a cost-saving measure tied to expanded domestic biofuel consumption.
 

 E15 economic forecasts diverge sharply over adoption assumptionsNCGA projects stronger corn demand and farm returns from aggressive nationwide E15 growth, while other analyses assume slower consumer uptake and more limited ethanol market expansion The National Corn Growers Association analysis differs from several other recent E15 studies mainly because of two core assumptions: how fast E15 adoption expands nationwide and how aggressive future Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) blending mandates become. Those assumptions dramatically change the projected impacts on corn demand, soybean prices, and federal farm program spending. NCGA argues that many competing analyses — especially the recent University of Missouri/FAPRI work cited by soybean groups and budget critics — underestimate future E15 penetration and fail to incorporate EPA’s recently finalized, historically large Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs) for biomass-based diesel and renewable fuels. The biggest difference is the assumed pace of E15 market adoption. The NCGA/WAEES model assumes E15 adoption “aligns with industry projections,” which is considerably more aggressive than assumptions used in some competing models. While NCGA does not publish a single headline percentage for nationwide E15 market share in the public summary, the model clearly assumes substantial long-term infrastructure and retail expansion. That assumption drives the study’s conclusion that corn ethanol demand rises by roughly 700 million bushels by the 2035/36 marketing year, with corn used for ethanol climbing to 5.8 billion bushels versus 5.1 billion in the baseline. By contrast, the FAPRI-related analysis highlighted in congressional debate appears to assume a slower retail rollout and more limited consumer uptake. That model found only modest corn-price gains — roughly 14 cents per bushel by 2035 — while projecting more meaningful downside pressure on soybean prices and soy-based biofuels demand. Another major dividing line is treatment of the biodiesel/renewable diesel market. NCGA’s economists argue the newer EPA RVO volumes for 2026-2027 materially alter the baseline because they significantly increase overall renewable fuel requirements, particularly D4 biomass-based diesel RINs. NCGA says using these updated RVOs produces a stronger commodity-price baseline more consistent with current USDA projections and futures markets. In their view, earlier studies relied on outdated or lower RVO assumptions that exaggerated soybean-sector losses or federal spending increases. The soybean sector’s concern is that higher ethanol blending shifts the RFS compliance mix toward corn ethanol (D6 RINs) and away from biomass-based diesel (D4 RINs), potentially weakening soybean oil demand growth over time. The NCGA study acknowledges that soybean prices fall in its model — about 48 cents per bushel below baseline by 2035/36 — but argues the gains to corn producers more than offset those losses for typical Midwest farms that raise both crops. There is also disagreement over Small Refinery Exemptions (SREs). NCGA’s “E15+SRE” scenario assumes non-reallocated SREs beginning in 2028 at nearly 500 million RINs annually. That matters because SRE treatment affects overall blending obligations and therefore the balance between ethanol and biodiesel demand growth. Different assumptions here can substantially alter projected government outlays and crop-price relationships. The Congressional Budget Office also flagged adoption uncertainty as one of the largest variables in estimating fiscal effects. According to reporting summarizing the CBO review, budget outcomes depend heavily on “how quickly consumers and retailers adopt E15.” In practical terms, the adoption-rate debate comes down to whether analysts believe year-round legality unleashes rapid infrastructure growth or whether E15 remains mostly a Midwest product. NCGA and ethanol groups appear to be assuming:• continued annual EPA summer waivers effectively normalize E15 nationwide,• fuel retailers rapidly add compatible pumps and tanks,• consumers increasingly adopt E15 because it is typically cheaper than E10,and policy support plus high RVOs accelerate long-run ethanol blending demand. More cautious analyses assume:• slower station conversion rates,• uneven regional acceptance outside the Corn Belt,• refinery resistance,• and limits on how much ethanol can realistically penetrate the gasoline pool nationally. That is why estimates for E15’s impact vary so widely across studies — the policy itself is less controversial than the assumptions about how quickly the market would actually use it. 
EPA REGULATIONS

EPA delays Biden-era vehicle rules

Agency says proposed pause would lower vehicle costs and ease pressure on automakers shifting away from EV investments 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Thursday proposed delaying compliance deadlines for the Biden-era Tier 4 vehicle emissions standards by two years, pushing implementation for light- and medium-duty vehicles to model year 2029. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said the move would save more than $1.7 billion and reduce vehicle costs for consumers, arguing the original standards were based on overly aggressive assumptions about electric vehicle adoption that have not materialized.

The proposal would allow automakers to continue complying with existing Tier 3 emissions standards for model years 2027 and 2028 while EPA undertakes a broader review of the Tier 4 framework. The Trump administration contends the Biden-era rules became “unattainable” as consumer demand for EVs weakened and manufacturers scaled back electric vehicle investments. EPA cited recent decisions by General Motors, Ford Motor Company, and Stellantis to reduce or reconsider portions of their EV production strategies.

Zeldin framed the proposal as part of a broader deregulatory agenda focused on restoring consumer choice and protecting U.S. auto manufacturing jobs. The agency said Tier 3 standards already deliver emissions reductions of up to 80% and argued additional time is needed to phase in stricter standards more realistically. EPA also indicated it plans a second phase of review that could reconsider Tier 4 emissions targets, implementation schedules, and testing procedures.

The announcement continues a wider Trump administration rollback of Biden-era vehicle emissions policies. EPA highlighted earlier actions repealing California emissions waivers through the Congressional Review Act and the administration’s repeal effort targeting the 2009 Endangerment Finding and related greenhouse gas vehicle regulations. The agency also tied the proposal to ongoing efforts addressing diesel exhaust fluid requirements and right-to-repair issues affecting farmers and truckers.

EPA will open a 45-day public comment period before moving toward a final rule.

ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY

Friday: Oil rally intensifies on Hormuz risks

Crude heads for weekly surge as U.S./Iran tensions escalate

Brent crude futures climbed to around $109 per barrel on Friday and were on track for a weekly gain of roughly 8% as traders remained focused on persistent disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and the collapse of momentum in U.S.-Iran peace negotiations. Markets reacted after President Donald Trump warned Iran to reach a deal or face “annihilation,” signaling growing frustration from Washington as negotiations stalled. U.S. WTI crude futures climbed to just over $104 per barrel. 

The latest comments came despite reports from Iran that approximately 30 vessels had crossed the Strait since Wednesday evening, suggesting only limited improvements in shipping activity. The U.S. and Iran failed earlier this week to finalize a U.S.-drafted proposal aimed at easing tensions and restoring maritime security, leaving the strategically critical waterway largely constrained and global energy markets on edge.

Meanwhile, optimism surrounding a durable ceasefire continued to fade as attacks and vessel seizures in the region reinforced concerns over broader supply disruptions. The International Energy Agency said crude oil and fuel flows through the Strait declined by roughly 4 million barrels per day during March and April, warning that global oil markets could remain materially undersupplied through October even if the conflict is resolved next month.

Adding another geopolitical dimension, Trump said China is seeking to increase purchases of U.S. crude oil as Beijing looks to reduce reliance on Middle Eastern shipping routes while transit through Hormuz remains unstable.

Thursday: Oil market holds firm as Hormuz risks continue to dominate trade

Crude futures end slightly higher amid limited Strait traffic recovery and rising geopolitical tensions

Oil futures ended narrowly higher Thursday as traders continued to closely monitor developments surrounding the Iran conflict, shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz, and broader concerns about the global economic fallout from elevated energy prices.

Brent crude futures settled up 9 cents at $105.72 per barrel after earlier climbing as high as $107.13 during the session, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose 15 cents to close at $101.17 per barrel. The muted late-session gains reflected continued market caution despite signs of limited improvement in tanker traffic through the strategically critical waterway.

Markets remained highly sensitive to conditions in the Strait of Hormuz, which normally handles roughly 20% of global oil and refined product flows. Iranian state media reported that about 30 vessels crossed the strait since Wednesday evening, an improvement from the severely reduced traffic levels seen earlier in the conflict. However, that figure remains far below the estimated 140 daily crossings that occurred before fighting erupted in late February.

Traders also focused on growing diplomatic involvement from China following meetings in Beijing between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Both leaders reportedly agreed that the Strait of Hormuz should remain open to global energy shipments, underscoring mounting international concern over prolonged supply disruptions.

China has additionally signaled interest in expanding purchases of U.S. crude oil as Beijing seeks to reduce dependence on Middle Eastern shipping routes that remain vulnerable to military escalation and maritime attacks.

Meanwhile, regional security concerns continued to intensify. Reports indicated an Indian cargo vessel was sunk off the coast of Oman, while another ship near the UAE energy hub of Fujairah was allegedly boarded and redirected toward Iran. Iran has also reportedly begun selectively permitting some Chinese-linked vessels to transit the strait, highlighting the increasingly politicized nature of maritime access in the region.

Energy analysts said the modest recovery in shipping movements could help calm some near-term panic in oil markets, but warned that supply conditions remain extremely tight and vulnerable to further disruptions if attacks escalate or insurance and freight costs continue rising.

Broader macroeconomic concerns also remained a major market driver. The International Monetary Fund warned that the global economy is increasingly moving toward a more adverse scenario as sustained energy price spikes and supply-chain disruptions weaken growth prospects while intensifying inflationary pressures worldwide.

Meanwhile, U.S. government inventory data provided additional support to crude prices. U.S. crude oil stockpiles fell by 4.3 million barrels last week as exports increased, reinforcing perceptions of a still-tight global oil balance despite heightened price volatility and mounting recession concerns.

TRADE POLICY 

House pushes Trump team on China cotton tariffs

Lawmakers seek removal of Beijing’s cotton duties and stronger purchase commitments in U.S./China trade talks

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is urging the Trump administration to make the removal of Chinese tariffs on U.S. cotton a priority in ongoing trade negotiations with Beijing, warning that retaliatory duties have sharply reduced American cotton exports.

In a May 12 letter (link) to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, the lawmakers said U.S. cotton exports to China plunged 87% in 2025 and called for China’s 10% tariff on U.S. cotton to be eliminated as part of any broader trade agreement.

The request comes as President Donald Trump met this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, where the two sides discussed trade issues including a proposed “Board of Trade” mechanism designed to manage trade flows in non-sensitive goods. The lawmakers also pressed the administration to secure cotton purchase commitments from China that would “match or exceed” the ambitions of the Phase One trade agreement negotiated during Trump’s first term.

According to the lawmakers, China imported roughly 29% of all U.S. cotton produced between 2020 and 2024 following the Phase One agreement, which temporarily boosted Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural goods. However, they argued that Beijing ultimately failed to fully meet its commitments. The National Cotton Council told USTR in comments submitted during the agency’s Section 301 review last year that the U.S. could have sold an additional $393 million worth of cotton had China fully complied with the agreement.

The letter also emphasized the need for enforceable compliance provisions in any future trade arrangement. The lawmakers said any new agreement must include “clear remedies” if China fails to fulfill its commitments, reflecting broader concerns within Congress about enforcement gaps in prior U.S./China trade deals.

Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), a member of the House Ways & Means Committee, led the effort. Other signatories included Reps. David Kustoff (R-Tenn.), Greg Murphy (R-N.C.), and Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.), the lone Democrat to sign the letter. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins also received copies.

The latest push follows a separate March letter led by Arrington urging the administration to negotiate the removal of Indian tariffs on U.S. cotton as Washington and New Delhi work toward a broader trade agreement.

USDA REORGANIZATION 

Senate Democrats challenge USDA REE reorganization

Lawmakers warn planned restructuring could weaken USDA research capacity and undermine key farm data services

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), ranking member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, led 23 Senate Democrats and Independents in expressing concerns over the Trump administration’s planned reorganization of USDA’s Research, Education, and Economics (REE) mission area, warning the effort could significantly weaken the department’s scientific research and economic data capabilities.

In a letter (link) to USDA Deputy Secretary Stephen Vaden, the lawmakers argued that the restructuring risks “erod[ing] the capacity of USDA’s research agencies” and threatening their ability to provide innovation, research funding, and timely economic data relied upon by farmers, ranchers, and rural communities. The senators said the proposed reorganization — announced in April — would relocate REE staff across more than 27 locations within a matter of months, while many operational details remain unclear.

The lawmakers pointed to the controversial 2018 and 2019 relocations of the Economic Research Service (ERS) and National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), which the Government Accountability Office later concluded resulted in the loss of more than half of agency staff. According to the senators, the GAO found USDA failed to adequately engage employees, Congress, and stakeholders during that earlier restructuring process and did not follow established best management practices.

The letter also highlighted more recent staffing reductions across REE agencies in 2025, including losses exceeding 30% at the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). The senators warned those reductions are already fueling concerns among stakeholders about the reliability and timeliness of USDA statistical reports and market data.

Along with Klobuchar, the letter was signed by Sens. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), and several other Democratic lawmakers.

The senators requested USDA provide a detailed explanation within 30 days outlining how the department plans to minimize disruptions to research operations, funding administration, and data collection activities. They also pressed USDA to explain how it is engaging employees and complying with GAO recommendations regarding federal agency reorganizations and collective bargaining obligations.

The dispute comes amid broader congressional scrutiny of USDA restructuring efforts, including plans affecting the Agricultural Research Service, ERS, NIFA, NASS, and other agencies within the REE mission area.

FOOD AID

USDA expands Food for Peace funding under ‘America First’ rules

Devex reports USDA’s revamped Food for Peace program is prioritizing U.S. commodities and shipping costs while drawing criticism over country selections and aid delivery restrictions

Devex reports that USDA has opened a new $357 million Food for Peace funding round targeting seven countries, while imposing stricter “America First” requirements that prioritize U.S.-grown commodities and ocean shipping costs. The changes come as USDA continues managing the program after taking control from USAID and have sparked criticism from former aid officials and food security experts over efficiency concerns and the exclusion of some of the world’s worst hunger hotspots. 

The funding opportunity applies to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Haiti, Kenya, and Rwanda, with awards ranging from $20 million to $200 million over 18- to 24-month periods.

USDA said all aid purchased through the program must come from the United States, while banning the use of cash or food vouchers that humanitarian agencies have historically used to deliver aid more quickly and at lower cost.

The notice also requires that 50% of all program funds be reserved for American agricultural commodities and ocean freight costs, a provision critics argue could reduce funding available for local transportation, warehousing, nutrition programs, and emergency implementation efforts.

Former USAID and Food for Peace officials warned the structure could create duplicate logistics systems in countries where the World Food Program already received USDA-backed Food for Peace support earlier this year.

Questions have also emerged over USDA’s country selections. Sudan and Gaza — where famine conditions were formally identified last year — were excluded from both recent funding rounds, alongside South Sudan and Mali, despite those countries appearing on recent U.N. lists of the world’s highest food insecurity concerns. Meanwhile, El Salvador and Rwanda were included even though they were not among the most severe hunger cases identified by global food security monitors.

Critics suggested geopolitical considerations may be influencing the aid strategy, particularly regarding El Salvador, whose president, Nayib Bukele, has strengthened ties with President Donald Trump in recent months.

USDA defended the approach by saying the department is focused on “bringing Food for Peace back to its core function” of supporting American farmers while addressing emergency food needs abroad.

The debate also overlaps with ongoing farm bill negotiations, where lawmakers are considering codifying the 50% U.S.-commodity mandate into law. Supporters argue the policy expands overseas markets for American agriculture, while opponents warn it could undermine the humanitarian effectiveness of Food for Peace and weaken the program’s ability to respond rapidly to global famine and malnutrition crises.

LABOR & IMMIGRATION POLICY 

Judge rejects bid to block lower farmworker wages

Federal court ruling allows new H-2A wage rates to remain in effect as litigation continues

A federal judge has denied a request from the United Farm Workers seeking a preliminary injunction to halt implementation of newly lowered wage rates for certain agricultural workers, marking a significant legal setback for farm labor advocates challenging recent changes to the federal H-2A guestworker program.

The lawsuit centered on revisions to the Adverse Effect Wage Rate (AEWR), the mandatory minimum wage employers must pay H-2A agricultural guestworkers and corresponding domestic workers. The union argued the updated methodology would depress wages for farmworkers in several job categories and regions, while also undermining labor protections intended to prevent foreign labor from adversely impacting U.S. workers.

In denying the injunction request, the federal judge concluded that the plaintiffs had not met the legal standard necessary for emergency relief, including demonstrating irreparable harm or a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits of the case. The ruling means the updated wage calculations can remain in place while the broader lawsuit proceeds through the courts.

The dispute stems from changes made to how the U.S. Department of Labor calculates wage rates for agricultural occupations under the H-2A program. Under prior policy, most H-2A wage rates were tied to USDA farm labor survey data. The revised approach incorporates Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics data for certain non-field and specialized farm jobs, which in some cases results in lower required pay rates than under the previous methodology.

Farm groups and agricultural employers have argued the revised structure provides more accurate regional labor-market pricing and helps control escalating labor costs that have strained growers facing high input expenses, weak commodity prices, and labor shortages. Many agricultural organizations contend rapid AEWR increases in recent years have outpaced farm profitability and contributed to financial pressure across labor-intensive sectors including fruit, vegetable, dairy, and nursery operations.

Meanwhile, labor advocates and farmworker groups maintain the lower wage framework risks suppressing earnings for both foreign guestworkers and domestic farm laborers. The United Farm Workers argued the policy change could incentivize employers to shift workers into lower-paid occupational classifications.

The legal battle comes amid broader debate over the future of the H-2A program, which has expanded rapidly as farms increasingly rely on foreign guestworkers amid chronic domestic labor shortages. Agricultural employers have repeatedly pressed Congress and federal regulators for reforms aimed at stabilizing labor availability and reducing compliance costs, while labor organizations continue pushing for stronger wage protections and enforcement standards.

The case is expected to continue on the merits in federal court, with additional rulings likely to influence labor costs and hiring practices across major U.S. agricultural sectors.

CONGRESS

Senate moves to withhold lawmakers’ pay during shutdowns

Resolution led by Sen. John Kennedy aims to increase pressure on Congress to avoid future funding lapses

The Senate approved a resolution Thursday that would withhold senators’ paychecks during future government shutdowns, beginning after the November midterm elections. The measure, sponsored by John Kennedy (R-La.), passed by voice vote and is designed to create additional political pressure to avoid funding breakdowns that have repeatedly disrupted government operations this Congress.

Under the resolution, senators’ salaries would not stop permanently — since congressional pay is protected under the Constitution — but the Senate secretary would delay access to those funds until a shutdown ends.

The proposal applies only to senators and does not affect House members.

The move comes after several recent funding standoffs forced federal employees to work without pay while lawmakers continued receiving salaries, a long-standing source of public criticism during shutdown fights. The measure is intended to reinforce accountability as Congress faces continued partisan divisions over spending legislation.

WEATHER

— NWS outlook: Enhanced risk of severe thunderstorms across much of Iowa with a slight risk extending down to the Oklahoma and Texas Panhandles for today and tonight… …Next round of strong to severe thunderstorms forecast for the northern Plains Saturday night into Sunday morning… …Heat builds across the central Plains as cool and unsettled weather spreads into the Pacific Northwest and northern Rockies.

Western Corn Belt swings from drought to deluge before returning dry

Heavy storms are expected to stall planting and recharge soil moisture across the western Corn Belt and northern Plains, while drought and heat intensify in portions of the hard red winter wheat belt ahead of a potential frost threat next week

The western Corn Belt and northern Plains are shifting rapidly from severe dryness into an active storm pattern, with widespread thunderstorms expected daily through the next five days. The wetter pattern is expected to halt recent planting progress but should provide much-needed topsoil moisture after persistent winds and dry conditions heightened fire danger across parts of the region.

Meanwhile, the hard red winter wheat belt is expected to remain largely on the edge of the heaviest rainfall. While isolated storms are possible, the driest areas of western Kansas and the Oklahoma and Texas panhandles are forecast to miss most meaningful precipitation, worsening drought stress as extreme heat builds in the near term.

Forecast models indicate another major transition after the five-day period. The western Corn Belt and northern Plains are expected to shift back into a below-normal precipitation pattern during the 6-10 day and 11–15-day outlooks, raising concerns that the current moisture improvement could be temporary.

At the same time, the Mid-South and southern Plains are forecast to enter an unusually wet pattern during Week Two, with rainfall totals potentially reaching double normal levels. The excessive moisture could disrupt ongoing fieldwork and delay additional planting activity in those regions.

Temperature volatility is also becoming a concern. The current stretch of abnormal heat is expected to break sharply early next week, with lows forecast in the 28-34 degree range from Monday through Wednesday mornings across western Nebraska and parts of the northern Plains. The cold snap could pose a frost risk to newly emerged crops before temperatures moderate again by around May 24.