Ag Intel

U.S./China Trade Discussions in Beijing Around July 10

U.S./China Trade Discussions in Beijing Around July 10 

A Prop 12 end-around in Senate has some lawmakers upset | Year-round E15 faces its toughest hurdle in the Senate | U.S. screwworm count rises as Rollins heads to Mexico

LINKS 

Link: Democratic Far Leftward Shift Creates New Midterm Political Test

Link: Trump Doubles Down on Iran Ag Sales Pledge at White House Dinner
Link: Trump Administration Ties Regenerative Farming to Expanding
         Biofuel Markets
Link: USDA Lowers 2026 Food Inflation Forecast, but Prices Keep Climbing
Link: Argentine Soy Strike Threat Adds Risk Premium to Soy Complex
Link: Rollins’ Mexico Visit Highlights Intensifying Binational Fight Against
          New World Screwworm
Link:  Supreme Court Backs Border ‘Metering’ Policy in Major Win for
           Trump’s Immigration Agenda

Link:   Supreme Court Shields Pesticide Makers from State
           Failure-to-Warn Claims

Link:Video: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, June 22 
Video show is now on You Tube,Spotify & Apple
Link:Audio: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, June 22 

Updates: Policy/News/Markets, June 26, 2026
UP FRONT


TOP STORIES

— China seeking price offers on soybeans, maybe corn: China is seeking new-crop U.S. soybean offers as both sides prepare for July trade talks that could trigger additional purchases and tariff reductions.

— Year-round E15 faces toughest Senate test: Disputes over small refinery exemptions and biodiesel impacts will determine whether permanent summer E15 sales can clear the Senate.

— U.S., Uzbekistan accelerate trade agreement talks: A proposed bilateral trade pact could expand export opportunities for U.S. agriculture and diversify overseas markets.

— Supreme Court rulings favor Trump administration and business: Decisions on Roundup litigation, immigration and other cases strengthen federal authority and reduce legal uncertainty for agriculture.

— Regenerative agriculture order advances 45Z framework: USDA finalized key feedstock standards and carbon tools, moving implementation of the clean fuel tax credit closer to reality.

— RFA defends EPA renewable fuel mandates: Biofuel advocates say record blending requirements support ethanol investment, rural economies and long-term corn demand.

— U.S. screwworm cases increase as Rollins visits Mexico: Rising Texas detections add urgency to expanding sterile-fly production and strengthening the U.S.-Mexico containment strategy.

STRAIT OF HORMUZ

— Crude continues flowing through Hormuz despite vessel attack: Oil shipments remain uninterrupted despite another maritime attack, limiting the geopolitical risk premium.

FINANCIAL MARKETS

— Equities today: Global technology weakness is weighing on U.S. futures ahead of key economic reports and Fed commentary.

— Equities yesterday: Stocks finished mixed as investors rotated out of technology and into defensive sectors.

AG MARKETS

— Overnight grain markets weaken on harvest and weather pressure: Wheat leads declines while traders await next week’s USDA acreage and grain stocks reports.

— European heat wave threatens corn production: Deteriorating crop conditions are increasing expectations for larger EU corn imports later this year.

— International grain markets ease: Harvest pressure and aggressive Black Sea competition continue to outweigh growing European weather concerns.

— Cotton adjusted world price moves higher: USDA raised the cotton Adjusted World Price for the week.

— U.S. hog inventory slips slightly: A smaller breeding herd is offset by record litter sizes, pointing to gradual herd contraction.

— Ag markets rebound Thursday: Short covering, bargain buying and positioning ahead of USDA reports lifted most grain and livestock futures.

FARM POLICY

— Proposition 12 speculation complicates Senate farm bill: Rumors of a conference committee strategy are creating new uncertainty over Senate support.

ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY

— Oil falls as Hormuz shipping recovers: Expanding Gulf exports and improved tanker traffic continue to pressure crude prices lower.

U.S./CANADA RELATIONS

— Bridge dispute adds pressure to U.S.-Canada talks: Delayed opening of the Gordie Howe Bridge highlights the administration’s willingness to revisit prior agreements.

LABOR & IMMIGRATION POLICY

— Farm Bureau renews push for agricultural labor reform: The organization will spotlight workforce shortages and advocate for modernization of the H-2A program.

WEATHER

— National Weather Service warns of storms, heat and fire danger: Heavy rain, severe weather and expanding heat remain the dominant U.S. weather threats.

— Heavy rains reshape crop outlook: Flooding delays wheat harvest while improving soil moisture ahead of hotter weather across the Corn Belt.
 

 TOP STORIESChina returns for new-crop U.S. soybean price offersSeptember-forward buying signals demand, but Brazil still limits loyalty Chinese importers are again seeking offers for U.S. soybeans for September-forward shipment, an encouraging sign that Beijing is beginning to secure supplies from the upcoming U.S. harvest and is moving toward fulfilling its commitment to purchase 25 million metric tons (MMT) of U.S. soybeans annually through 2028. USDA officials have said China has already begun placing orders tied to the 2026 harvest, and today’s reports of fresh requests for bids reinforce expectations that additional purchases are likely to accelerate as harvest approaches.  The timing is not surprising. China traditionally shifts a significant share of its soybean buying to the United States during the Northern Hemisphere harvest window from roughly September through January before Brazilian supplies dominate global export channels again in late winter and spring. By requesting September-forward offers now, Chinese buyers are positioning themselves to secure supplies during the period when U.S. soybeans are generally the world’s most competitive origin. The purchases also fit within the broader trade framework negotiated between Washington and Beijing. China previously committed to buy at least 12 MMT of soybeans from the 2025 crop and then purchase at least 25 MMT annually beginning with the 2026 crop. USDA officials continue to express confidence those commitments will be honored, while the White House has separately announced Chinese commitments to purchase at least $17 billion annually in additional U.S. agricultural products during 2026-2028 beyond the soybean agreement (2026 prorated). Even so, analysts say producers should avoid assuming China has returned as a permanently dependable customer. The structural relationship has changed dramatically over the past decade. Brazil has become China’s dominant soybean supplier through massive investments in production, logistics and export infrastructure. Chinese buyers now routinely diversify purchases between Brazil, the United States and, to a lesser extent, Argentina to reduce dependence on any single supplier. Analysts generally expect China to meet its contractual soybean obligations but not necessarily exceed them significantly unless weather problems or price relationships favor additional U.S. business. If so, that means the 25 MMT commitment should be viewed more as a floor than the return to the pre-trade war buying patterns that routinely saw Chinese purchases exceed 30 MMT in strong years. If Brazil produces another large crop and remains price competitive, Chinese importers are likely to continue balancing purchases rather than relying primarily on the United States. Beyond soybeans, there are signs China is expanding interest across several U.S. agricultural sectors. The trade understandings announced this spring include renewed or expanded opportunities for U.S. sorghum, cotton, beef, poultry, hardwood logs and potentially wheat and corn, depending on domestic Chinese feed demand and relative global prices. Beef and poultry market access has also been improving following regulatory agreements between the two countries. Of note: China’s reported inquiries into U.S. soybean prices this week are encouraging, but price checks alone do not signal that significant purchases are imminent. Chinese state buyers routinely monitor U.S. Gulf and Pacific Northwest export values, compare them with Brazilian offers, and evaluate freight and currency movements before making buying decisions. The absence of confirmed sales suggests Beijing is still waiting for a more favorable political and tariff environment before committing to larger volumes. Observers signal the next potential catalyst is the anticipated U.S./China trade discussions in Beijing around July 10. Market participants increasingly believe the meeting could produce additional reductions in China’s retaliatory tariffs or other import restrictions on U.S. agricultural commodities. Even a modest reduction in soybean import duties would improve the competitiveness of U.S. supplies as the new-crop export season approaches. The Trump administration has made expanded agricultural trade a central objective of its negotiations with Beijing, while China has already committed to substantial long-term purchases of U.S. soybeans under earlier trade understandings. Timing is particularly important. Brazil remains the dominant soybean supplier during the first half of the calendar year, but U.S. export availability expands rapidly beginning with harvest in September. If tariff issues are resolved in July, Chinese importers could begin booking significant volumes of new-crop U.S. soybeans during August and September, allowing cargoes to ship during the peak U.S. export window. That would provide welcome support for U.S. soybean prices ahead of harvest and could improve export demand projections in upcoming USDA supply-and-demand reports. Corn could also benefit, although the opportunity is less certain than for soybeans. China continues to maintain large domestic grain inventories and has substantially reduced corn imports over the past two years. However, deteriorating weather across portions of Europe and ongoing concerns about feed grain availability worldwide could eventually increase China’s willingness to diversify corn purchases if trade barriers are eased. Another closely watched development is the possible activation of the U.S./China Board of Trade in August. That mechanism, announced following recent bilateral agreements, is intended to provide a structured forum for resolving commercial disputes, improving regulatory coordination, and facilitating implementation of agricultural purchase commitments. If operational, it could reduce the stop-and-start pattern that has characterized U.S./China agricultural trade over the past several years by providing a more predictable channel for addressing market access issues before they escalate into broader trade disputes. Even with these positive signals, several uncertainties remain. China has spent years diversifying soybean imports toward Brazil and Argentina, reducing its dependence on U.S. supplies. Chinese buyers are also likely to avoid concentrating purchases until they have greater confidence that tariff reductions will remain in place. Consequently, while the reported price inquiries are constructive, the market will likely require confirmed export sales—and ultimately announced tariff adjustments—before treating the development as the beginning of a sustained Chinese buying program. For the soybean market, the July negotiations may represent the most important near-term policy event. A successful outcome could quickly shift attention from speculative price inquiries to sizable export announcements, providing fundamental support for new-crop soybean futures during the critical pre-harvest period. For grain markets, the soybean buying is supportive because it demonstrates China is moving from political commitments toward commercial execution. Consistent weekly export sales announcements during the summer and early fall would likely reinforce confidence that the 25 MMT target is attainable and could provide additional support to soybean futures during the critical harvest marketing period. However, traders will continue to judge Beijing by actual export sales and vessel loadings rather than policy statements, especially given China’s demonstrated willingness over recent years to shift purchases rapidly among competing global suppliers.Year-round E15 faces its toughest hurdle in the SenateDispute over SREs and biodiesel impacts may determine final outcome The House’s narrow approval of nationwide, year-round E15 sales marked the biggest legislative victory for the ethanol industry in years, but it also exposed the difficult political balancing act that now shifts to the Senate. While corn growers and ethanol producers broadly celebrated the vote, the legislation also created an unusual split within the broader biofuels industry, with soybean and biodiesel interests warning that portions of the House language could ultimately reduce biomass-based diesel production rather than expand overall renewable fuel use. Link to our previous special report on the Senate and E15.  At the center of the debate is not the E15 provision itself. Nearly every major agricultural organization supports permanently allowing E15 sales during the summer instead of relying on annual emergency waivers from EPA. The real fight involves the Renewable Fuel Standard’s Small Refinery Exemption (SRE) provisions and how EPA would redistribute renewable volume obligations (RVOs) when exemptions are granted. The House compromise was crafted to attract support not only from ethanol producers but also from the American Petroleum Institute (API). That alliance would have been almost unthinkable just a few years ago. API’s support reflects the fact that the House bill attempts to provide greater certainty for refiners while permanently resolving the annual E15 summertime issue. The petroleum industry also views the legislation as preferable to continuing EPA’s repeated emergency waivers, which have created ongoing regulatory uncertainty. Higher gasoline supplies through expanded E15 availability also fit refiners’ desire for more predictable fuel markets. However, biomass-based diesel producers view the House compromise much differently. Several industry analysts, along with biodiesel advocates, argue the House language could weaken incentives for renewable diesel and biodiesel if exempted refinery obligations are not fully reallocated to larger refiners. In their view, every gallon waived through SREs without full redistribution lowers overall renewable fuel demand, disproportionately affecting biomass-based diesel because ethanol already has a relatively secure position in the gasoline pool through E10 blending. That concern explains why soybean growers and some biodiesel producers have been noticeably less enthusiastic than corn groups. Economic modeling cited by several analysts suggests year-round E15 would increase corn demand but could simultaneously reduce soybean oil demand if total renewable fuel obligations decline because of expanded refinery exemptions. The Senate is expected to focus almost entirely on modifying those provisions. Negotiators are discussing whether the House’s refinery eligibility threshold should be revised, whether EPA should retain broader discretion over hardship exemptions, and — perhaps most importantly — whether every waived gallon should automatically be reallocated among non-exempt refiners so that statutory renewable fuel volumes remain unchanged. These issues have become the principal focus of Senate negotiations between ethanol supporters and senators representing refining states. For many renewable fuel advocates, full reallocation is the key issue. They argue Congress intended the Renewable Fuel Standard to establish national blending volumes, not volumes that shrink whenever exemptions are granted. Biodiesel producers have made clear that without stronger reallocation language, the House compromise risks shifting renewable fuel growth toward ethanol while limiting future expansion opportunities for biomass-based diesel. API’s preference for the House language reflects the opposite concern. Refiners generally favor maintaining flexibility in the exemption process while avoiding automatic increases in compliance obligations for larger facilities. The House compromise represents a middle ground that many petroleum companies believe they can accept, even if neither side receives everything it wants. Whether the Senate can assemble 60 votes remains highly uncertain. The House narrowly approved the measure, 218-203, after an unusual coalition of Midwestern Republicans, farm-state Democrats and one independent overcame opposition from many refinery-state lawmakers, fiscal conservatives and some environmental-minded Democrats. The Senate math is even more challenging because supporters must attract members from both farm and refining states while avoiding defections from either side. Senators from Wyoming, Oklahoma, Texas and other refining states continue pressing for stronger refinery protections, while farm-state senators want assurances that ethanol demand will expand without sacrificing biodiesel growth. The most likely path forward may not be a stand-alone Senate vote. Instead, supporters increasingly expect the measure to ride on larger legislation such as what President Trump recently proposed, on the supplemental spending bill that includes farmer aid and ag disaster funding for Florida. That approach would also give Senate leaders more flexibility to modify the SRE and reallocation provisions while preserving the core year-round E15 language. Bottom line: the Senate debate is no longer simply about allowing motorists to buy E15 year-round. It has evolved into a broader argument over how renewable fuel obligations should be allocated between ethanol and biomass-based diesel, how much flexibility refiners should retain under the Renewable Fuel Standard, and whether Congress can produce a compromise that expands ethanol without unintentionally weakening soybean-based biofuels. Unless negotiators can satisfy both corn and soybean interests while keeping enough refinery-state senators on board, year-round E15 could once again find itself stalled despite its growing bipartisan support. U.S., Uzbekistan speed trade talksProposed pact could expand export opportunities for U.S. agriculture The United States and Uzbekistan have agreed to accelerate negotiations on a reciprocal trade and investment agreement, according to a statement from the U.S. Trade Representative’s office (link). This marks another step in the Trump administration’s strategy of pursuing bilateral trade arrangements aimed at expanding market access for U.S. exports. Under the framework announced Thursday, Uzbekistan committed to eliminate or reduce tariffs on a broad range of U.S. industrial and agricultural products, while the United States said it would give favorable consideration to tariff treatment for Uzbek industrial and farm goods entering the U.S. market. For U.S. agriculture, the agreement could create new opportunities in a market that has steadily liberalized its economy since 2017. Although Uzbekistan’s population of roughly 38 million makes it a relatively modest export destination compared to major Asian markets, the country has growing demand for higher-value food products, livestock genetics and modern agricultural technology as incomes rise and its agricultural sector modernizes. Among the U.S. commodities that stand to benefit most are poultry, beef, dairy products, tree nuts, soybeans and soybean meal used in expanding livestock and poultry operations, along with planting seed, animal genetics and agricultural equipment. Wheat also could see opportunities, although Uzbekistan traditionally sources much of its wheat from neighboring Kazakhstan because of freight advantages. High-value processed foods, fresh fruit, and beverage ingredients also could become more competitive if tariffs are reduced.The agreement could also benefit U.S. cotton interests in a different way. Uzbekistan has historically been one of the world’s largest cotton producers but has shifted policy toward exporting more value-added textiles rather than raw fiber. Greater economic integration and investment could create opportunities for U.S. textile machinery, cotton processing equipment and technology rather than significantly increasing U.S. cotton exports. The proposed accord fits into the administration’s broader effort to diversify export markets beyond traditional customers such as China, Mexico and Canada. While Uzbekistan alone will not materially change overall U.S. agricultural export volumes, securing lower tariffs and stronger investment protections could position American exporters to capture a larger share of a fast-growing Central Asian economy that serves as a commercial hub for the region. For grain and oilseed markets, the direct impact is likely to be limited because of Uzbekistan’s relatively small import requirements and logistical challenges associated with shipping to a landlocked nation. However, livestock, dairy, poultry, specialty crop and value-added food exporters could realize more meaningful gains if tariff reductions improve the competitiveness of U.S. products against suppliers from Europe, Russia and neighboring Central Asian countries. The announcement also carries strategic significance beyond trade volumes. Strengthening commercial ties with Uzbekistan expands U.S. economic engagement in Central Asia at a time when Washington is seeking to deepen relationships in a region where Russia and China have traditionally held dominant economic influence. For U.S. agriculture, every additional market with reduced tariff barriers helps diversify export demand and lessen dependence on a handful of major foreign buyers. Supreme Court hands Trump, business key victories in end-of-term rulingsImmigration, pesticides and gun rights headline busy court session The U.S. Supreme Court capped one of the busiest weeks of its 2025-26 term Thursday with a series of closely watched decisions that strengthened the Trump administration’s immigration authority, expanded legal protections for pesticide manufacturers, and continued the court’s trend of limiting regulatory and state authority in several areas. The rulings underscore the influence of the court’s 6-3 conservative majority on issues with significant implications for agriculture, business and federal policy. For agriculture, the most consequential decision was the court’s ruling in the Roundup litigation. In a 6-3 decision, the justices held that federal pesticide law preempts state-law failure-to-warn claims when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has approved the product’s labeling. The ruling provides a major legal victory for Bayer and other pesticide manufacturers by sharply limiting thousands of state lawsuits alleging Roundup caused cancer because additional warning labels were not included. While other product liability claims may still proceed, the decision significantly strengthens the argument that EPA-approved labels should serve as the national standard for pesticide labeling. Link to our special report.  Bayer’s Supreme Court victory reshapes — but does not end — Roundup litigationFailure-to-warn claims largely blocked, but other legal theories remain The U.S. Supreme Court’s 7-2 ruling marks Bayer’s biggest legal victory since acquiring Monsanto in 2018, but it does not eliminate the company’s Roundup litigation. Instead, the decision fundamentally changes the legal landscape by removing what many attorneys viewed as plaintiffs’ strongest and most straightforward claim: that Bayer failed to warn users about an alleged cancer risk from glyphosate-based Roundup. The Court held that federal pesticide law pre-empts state-law failure-to-warn claims because the Environmental Protection Agency has repeatedly concluded that glyphosate does not pose a cancer risk requiring a warning label. Since EPA-approved labels cannot be unilaterally altered by manufacturers, the Court ruled that states cannot impose additional warning requirements through litigation. For Bayer, the ruling substantially reduces legal exposure. The company still faces roughly 65,000 pending lawsuits, but many of those cases relied heavily on failure-to-warn allegations. While those lawsuits do not automatically disappear, plaintiffs will now have to proceed under more difficult legal theories such as defective design, negligence, fraudulent marketing or misrepresentation. Those claims generally require more extensive evidence and are often more difficult to prove before juries. Bayer CEO Bill Anderson praised the ruling, noting that it restores critical regulatory certainty for innovators and agricultural producers who rely on uniform federal standards. The company stated the ruling should lead directly to the dismissal of the vast majority of current warning-based claims and prevent similar lawsuits in the future. From an agricultural perspective, the decision provides greater legal certainty for one of the world’s most widely used herbicides. Farm organizations and many crop groups have long argued that allowing state juries to require labels inconsistent with EPA findings would create conflicting regulatory standards, undermine the federal pesticide approval process and potentially threaten continued availability of important crop protection products. However, the ruling is far from a complete victory for Bayer. Plaintiffs can still argue that the company improperly marketed Roundup, concealed scientific information or that the product itself is defective. Bayer will almost certainly argue that Thursday’s decision weakens those remaining claims as well, but lower courts will decide how broadly to apply the Supreme Court’s reasoning. The decision also strengthens Bayer’s negotiating position regarding its proposed $7.25 billion nationwide settlement. That agreement, which still awaits final judicial approval, was negotiated before the Court issued its decision. Attorneys representing the settlement argue the ruling validates their strategy because claimants who accepted the settlement locked in compensation before losing one of their strongest legal claims. Conversely, plaintiffs who opted out now face a more challenging litigation environment. The broader significance extends beyond Bayer. The ruling reinforces the principle that federally approved product labels generally take precedence over conflicting state-law warning requirements. That precedent could have implications for future litigation involving other EPA-regulated pesticides and products subject to comprehensive federal labeling requirements. For agriculture, the immediate operational impact is limited because the decision does not change EPA’s current registration or labeling of glyphosate products. Farmers can continue using Roundup under existing federal guidelines. The larger effect is legal rather than regulatory: Bayer’s litigation risk has likely declined substantially, reducing uncertainty surrounding one of the industry’s most important weed-control tools. Nonetheless, litigation over glyphosate is likely to continue for years as courts sort through the remaining claims that survive the Supreme Court’s ruling.  The court also delivered another major victory to President Donald Trump’s immigration agenda by ruling 6-3 that Customs and Border Protection officials may turn away asylum seekers waiting at ports of entry under the so-called “metering” policy. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, concluded that migrants standing in Mexico have not legally “arrived” in the United States and therefore are not yet entitled to invoke statutory asylum protections. The decision overturns lower court rulings and clears the way for the administration to again use metering as part of broader border enforcement efforts. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the dissent, argued the ruling weakens longstanding asylum protections established by Congress. Link to our special report. In another immigration order issued Thursday, the court allowed the Trump administration to terminate Temporary Protected Status protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants from Haiti and Syria while litigation continues. Although procedural rather than a final ruling on the merits, the order allows the administration to proceed with ending those protections unless lower courts ultimately rule otherwise. The justices also struck down a Hawaii firearms restriction, continuing their recent expansion of Second Amendment protections. The ruling further limits the ability of states to enact gun-control measures that conflict with the Supreme Court’s increasingly stringent constitutional test established in recent Second Amendment cases. Taken together, Thursday’s opinions reinforce several themes that have defined the Roberts Court in recent years: greater deference to executive authority in immigration enforcement, stronger federal pre-emption over conflicting state regulations affecting interstate commerce, and continued skepticism toward expansive state regulatory authority. For agriculture, the Roundup decision is likely to have the most immediate commercial impact by reducing litigation exposure for pesticide manufacturers and potentially influencing future EPA labeling disputes involving other crop protection products. Meanwhile, the immigration rulings could indirectly affect agriculture by shaping future labor availability and border enforcement policies that remain critical issues for farm employers.Regenerative agriculture order advances 45Z frameworkUSDA finalizes key feedstock rule as Treasury guidance still awaited President Donald Trump’s executive order late Thursday on regenerative agriculture (link), combined with USDA’s completion of a long-awaited biofuel feedstock rule and an updated carbon intensity calculator, marks one of the most significant steps yet toward implementing the 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit.  Still waiting for key details. While the administration framed the actions as a broader effort to strengthen soil health and farm resilience, the immediate significance for production agriculture lies in providing two of the three major building blocks needed before farmers, ethanol producers and renewable fuel companies can fully assess the value of 45Z incentives. USDA announced completion of the final rule establishing Technical Guidelines for the Production of Regenerative Agricultural Biofuel Feedstocks after the measure completed review at the Office of Management and Budget. The proposal, which had been under OMB review since April 2 and generated extensive stakeholder engagement through 15 meetings, will establish nationwide standards governing regenerative production practices for corn, soybeans, sorghum and spring canola used in qualifying biofuel supply chains. Although the final regulatory text has not yet been released, USDA said it will establish standards covering eligible feedstocks and participating entities, field-level crop-specific carbon intensity calculations, mass-balance chain-of-custody requirements, recordkeeping and traceability standards, auditing and verification procedures, and qualifying regenerative farming practices. Meanwhile, USDA announced an updated Feedstock Carbon Intensity Calculator (FD-CIC), a tool that will allow producers to quantify the carbon benefits of practices such as cover crops, conservation tillage, no-till systems, reduced tillage and improved nutrient management. The calculator is expected to become one of the principal technical tools Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service will use in determining eligibility and carbon scores under the 45Z tax credit. The executive order complements those regulatory actions by directing USDA to expand its Regenerative Agriculture Pilot Program to encourage wider adoption of conservation practices while assigning additional responsibilities to several federal agencies. EPA is instructed to review scientific data and preserve the availability of crop protection products used in pre-harvest desiccation where supported by evidence. USDA, EPA and the Department of Health and Human Services also are directed to develop research methodologies examining cumulative chemical exposure in the U.S. food supply, although the order explicitly states that the effort should not result in regulatory actions beyond existing statutory authority. The order also directs HHS to expand research into evaluating cumulative chemical exposures, improving diagnosis and treatment methodologies, and identifying cost-effective alternatives to older crop protection technologies. EPA is instructed to prioritize registration reviews for newer crop protection products that could eventually replace older active ingredients. Taken together, the announcements suggest the administration is attempting to balance support for regenerative agriculture with assurances to conventional producers that existing crop protection tools will remain available during the transition. That approach is likely intended to ease concerns among farm groups that regenerative initiatives could become another pathway toward additional pesticide restrictions. For biofuel producers, however, the larger story is the continued movement toward operationalizing 45Z. Until now, uncertainty surrounding feedstock standards and carbon accounting methodologies has delayed investment decisions throughout the ethanol, renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel sectors. The finalized feedstock rule and updated FD-CIC calculator remove two major uncertainties by defining both qualifying production practices and the methodology for measuring their carbon benefits. The remaining critical piece is Treasury and IRS guidance implementing the 45Z tax credit itself. That final rule will determine how carbon intensity scores translate into tax credit values, how producers document compliance, and ultimately whether regenerative farming practices generate meaningful economic returns for growers supplying low-carbon fuel markets. Once Treasury releases that guidance alongside USDA’s newly completed framework, farmers and biofuel companies will finally be able to calculate the practical value of adopting regenerative practices under the new clean fuel incentive structure. RFA defends EPA biofuel mandates amid growing political pushbackIndustry says record RVOs support investment and strengthen rural economy The Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) is mounting a vigorous defense of the Environmental Protection Agency’s recently finalized Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs) for 2026 and 2027, arguing the mandates are both legally sound and economically justified as opposition from oil interests and some conservative advocacy groups intensifies. The RFA’s response comes after a coalition of conservative organizations urged Congress to overturn the EPA rule, contending the higher blending requirements will increase fuel costs and impose unnecessary burdens on refiners. Ethanol advocates reject those claims, maintaining that the finalized volumes reflect both existing production capacity and congressional intent under the Renewable Fuel Standard. The EPA’s rule established record conventional renewable fuel blending targets while also increasing advanced biofuel and biomass-based diesel requirements. The agency concluded that domestic production capacity and feedstock availability are sufficient to meet the higher obligations, a finding strongly supported by ethanol and biodiesel producers but challenged by segments of the refining industry. RFA argues the mandates provide long-needed market certainty after years of regulatory volatility. Stable RVOs encourage continued investment in ethanol plants, carbon intensity improvements, sustainable aviation fuel feedstocks and infrastructure needed to expand higher ethanol blends such as E15. The organization also emphasizes that stronger blending requirements help absorb larger U.S. corn supplies at a time when producers continue to face lower commodity prices and uncertain export demand. For agriculture, the stakes extend well beyond ethanol production. Roughly one-third of the U.S. corn crop ultimately flows into ethanol plants, making biofuel demand one of the largest structural supports for corn prices. Stronger RVOs also increase production of distillers grains, an important livestock feed ingredient, while supporting rural employment and investment across much of the Corn Belt. The timing is especially significant because the debate over biofuels has become increasingly political. While President Donald Trump’s administration finalized the higher blending mandates, several traditional conservative allies have criticized the rule as government intervention in fuel markets. Farm organizations and biofuel groups, however, view the mandates as fulfillment of congressional policy designed to diversify the nation’s fuel supply, strengthen energy security and support domestic agriculture. The outcome of the challenge will be closely watched by both commodity markets and investors. Although Congress could attempt to overturn the rule, such an effort would face significant political hurdles given broad bipartisan support for ethanol-producing states. Legal challenges from refining interests also remain possible, but the EPA believes the record supporting the finalized volumes is considerably stronger than in previous rulemakings. For corn producers, maintaining the higher RVOs would preserve one of the strongest domestic demand pillars entering the 2026-27 marketing year. With export competition remaining intense and livestock feed demand growing only modestly, ethanol demand continues to represent one of the most dependable sources of corn consumption. As a result, most agricultural economists believe preserving the finalized RVOs would be modestly supportive for corn prices and biofuel margins, even if broader grain markets continue to be driven primarily by weather, export sales and global supply conditions.U.S. screwworm count rises as Rollins heads to MexicoTexas remains the focal point as USDA presses binational response The rise in confirmed New World screwworm cases in the U.S. adds urgency to USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins’ trip to Mexico (link), where coordination on sterile-fly production, border surveillance and livestock movement controls will be central to containing the pest.USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is now reporting 25 total U.S. detections, all in Texas and New Mexico, with the five newest cases all in Texas. Of those, 22 remain active, all in Texas. That keeps the outbreak geographically concentrated but politically and economically sensitive, given the stakes for cattle producers and cross-border livestock trade. The new confirmations in Texas included four cases in sheep in Crocket County, a case in sheep in Edwards County, and a new county confirmation involving cattle in Medina County. As the cases have expanded, most have been north of Zavala County where the initial discovery took place. Only LaSalle County is south of Zavala County in terms of where cases have been confirmed. The situation also reveals the counties with the most cases are Edwards (6), Crockett (5), and Terrell County (4). The first confirmation in Edwards County was June 9, while the first in Crockett County was June 20 and all of the finds in Crockett County have been in sheep. In Zavala County where the first case was confirmed June 3, the last confirmed case was June 11. This suggests that initial containment efforts in the initial counties proved successful while the northern spread shows a need for continued actions to limit the spread. USDA still lists no confirmations in wildlife or feral animals, nor any fly trap detections. Rollins will travel to Mexico on Sat., June 27, to participate in the inauguration of a new New World screwworm (NWS) sterile fly production facility in Metapa de Dominguez, Chiapas, according to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Sheinbaum said Rollins will be joined by U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ron Johnson, underscoring the growing level of bilateral cooperation to contain the pest before it spreads farther north. The new Mexican facility is expected to increase sterile fly production by an additional 60 million to 100 million flies per week, according to USDA estimates. The expanded capacity is a key component of the sterile insect technique, which suppresses screwworm populations by releasing sterile male flies that prevent reproduction in the wild. The Mexico expansion comes as construction continues on USDA’s new sterile fly production center at Moore Air Base in Edinburg, Texas. That facility is expected to become operational in late 2027 with an initial production capacity of 100 million sterile flies per week and the ability to expand to as many as 300 million flies weekly. While both facilities represent significant progress in strengthening North America’s defenses against New World screwworm, animal health experts caution that total sterile fly production will still fall short of the levels needed to support a sustained eradication campaign if the pest continues expanding its geographic range. Even so, the new production capacity will improve the ability of U.S. and Mexican officials to respond more quickly to outbreaks and reinforces the shared strategy of containing the pest as far south as possible rather than allowing it to reach U.S. livestock-producing regions. Rollins’ Mexico visit gives USDA a chance to reinforce that the response must start at the source. Sterile-fly releases, rapid case reporting, wound inspections and tight movement protocols are all more effective when U.S. and Mexican officials are aligned. The key market question is whether the growing U.S. case count remains a contained Texas problem or begins to alter expectations for border reopening, cattle flows and broader livestock movement restrictions. For now, the case count is rising, but not yet spreading widely across states. That distinction matters. The situation is serious, but the concentration of active cases in Texas still gives USDA a defined containment zone — and Rollins’ Mexico trip signals Washington wants to keep it that way.
STRAIT OF HORMUZ


Crude continues flowing through Hormuz despite latest vessel attack

The incident raises security concerns, but markets remain focused on whether oil exports are actually being disrupted 

The latest attack on a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz has heightened tensions in one of the world’s most strategically important shipping lanes, but it has not stopped crude oil from moving through the waterway. That distinction is proving critical for energy markets, which have become increasingly focused on actual supply disruptions rather than geopolitical headlines alone.

The incident involved the Singapore-flagged container ship Ever Lovely, operated by Taiwan’s Evergreen Marine. According to the company and maritime authorities, the vessel was struck near Oman by what was initially described as an “unknown object” that damaged bridge windows on the starboard side. The crew was unharmed, the cargo remained secure, and the vessel continued its voyage after safely exiting the Strait of Hormuz. Maritime security officials believe the ship was most likely struck by a one-way attack drone.

Whether the attack was intentional has become the central question. While no group has formally claimed responsibility, U.S. officials and several intelligence assessments cited by major news organizations conclude the vessel was deliberately targeted by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The strike came only hours after Tehran warned commercial ships not to use navigation routes that had not been approved by Iranian authorities, making the timing difficult to dismiss as coincidental. The vessel reportedly was traveling along a United Nations-backed maritime corridor established to facilitate safer commercial transit.

Iran, however, has stopped short of publicly acknowledging responsibility. Instead, Iranian officials have argued that vessels operating outside routes coordinated with Tehran cannot be guaranteed safe passage. That position allows Iran to pressure commercial shipping without explicitly admitting it is attacking civilian vessels, while also reinforcing its longstanding claim that, as the principal coastal state bordering the strait, it should have a central role in regulating maritime traffic.

Despite the attack, oil exports continue to move. Reuters ship-tracking data show several very large crude carriers have continued entering the Persian Gulf to load cargoes, including vessels carrying Iranian crude. Traffic has slowed noticeably as shipowners reassess risks, but it has not collapsed. Daily tanker transits remain below normal levels, yet enough vessels continue operating to prevent a significant interruption in global oil supplies.

That explains why crude prices have remained relatively subdued. Earlier in the conflict, markets quickly priced in the possibility of a full closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Today, traders appear to be distinguishing between isolated attacks — which increase insurance costs, freight rates and voyage risk — and an actual shutdown that would remove millions of barrels of oil from world markets. If exports continue, the geopolitical risk premium is likely to remain limited.

For agriculture, that distinction is equally important. Continued crude flows help contain diesel prices, fertilizer production costs and ocean freight expenses that directly affect U.S. farm profitability and export competitiveness. A sustained interruption of Hormuz traffic would ripple through virtually every agricultural input and transportation market, but the latest incident has not yet reached that threshold.

Of note: The strike came as Iran is pushing to make billions of dollars from the strait as the regime positions itself to manage the global oil artery. The Wall Street Journal reports that Tehran is pitching the idea to the wider Middle East and as far afield as Beijing, according to Iranian officials. It wants its Persian Gulf neighbors to be part of the agreement and share the revenue. The Islamic Republic estimates that charging for security, safety and environmental services in the strait would bring in $40 billion a year in revenue for states involved, according to officials familiar with the matter. “Everyone needs to know that management of the (Strait of Hormuz) will never return to the way it was before,” said Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s chief negotiator. U.S. officials say Iranian officials say something for Iranians and other things in meetings with U.S. negotiators.

The broader concern is that the attack could establish a precedent. If commercial vessels begin facing repeated drone or missile strikes, shipping companies may decide the risks outweigh the rewards, even if the strait technically remains open. At that point, reduced tanker availability — not an official closure — could become the mechanism that constrains oil supplies. For now, however, the evidence suggests the attack was a deliberate act of intimidation rather than the start of a successful blockade, and the continued movement of crude remains the dominant factor shaping market sentiment.

FINANCIAL MARKETS


Equities today: U.S. equity futures are pointing lower Friday, with technology stocks once again leading the decline as investors continue to reassess valuations across the artificial intelligence and semiconductor sectors. The weakness follows another sharp overnight selloff in Asian chipmakers, suggesting concerns about the pace of AI infrastructure spending remain a global theme rather than simply a U.S. market issue.

The biggest overseas development came from South Korea, where the benchmark KOSPI index fell nearly 6%, driven by steep losses in memory-chip giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. Those companies have been among the biggest beneficiaries of the AI investment boom, making them particularly vulnerable as investors question whether the current pace of data center construction and AI capital spending can be sustained.

Reports that OpenAI could delay plans for an initial public offering also added to the cautious tone. While an IPO timing change would have little direct impact on corporate earnings, it reinforces a broader narrative that investors are becoming more selective about AI-related investments after an extended rally.

Beyond technology, today’s economic calendar could influence trading. The advance U.S. trade balance will provide another look at whether tariff policies and import patterns are beginning to affect the nation’s goods deficit. A narrower-than-expected deficit could modestly support second-quarter GDP estimates, while a wider reading could weigh on growth expectations.

The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index will also receive close scrutiny. Markets are looking for a reading near 50.0. Stable or improving consumer confidence would reinforce the view that household spending remains resilient despite higher prices and elevated interest rates. A weaker-than-expected report, however, could amplify concerns that economic momentum is slowing alongside the recent weakness in equities.

Wholesale inventories are another key release because they feed directly into GDP calculations. Economists expect a modest 0.3% increase. A significantly larger inventory build could reflect slowing demand, while a smaller increase could point to leaner supply chains and stronger underlying sales.

Federal Reserve Governor Neel Kashkari’s remarks at 11:30 a.m. ET also warrant attention. Investors will be listening for any comments regarding inflation progress, labor market conditions and the outlook for future interest-rate policy. Although Kashkari is not typically viewed as a policy bellwether, markets remain highly sensitive to any indication that Fed officials are becoming more or less comfortable with the inflation outlook.

Overall, today’s session appears set to revolve around three questions: whether the AI-driven technology correction has further to run, whether incoming economic data continue to support expectations for a soft economic landing, and whether Fed officials provide any new insight into the path of monetary policy. Until investors gain greater confidence on those fronts, volatility in technology shares is likely to remain the dominant driver of overall market direction.

In Asia, Japan -4.2%. Hong Kong -1.8%. China -2.3%. India closed.
 

In Europe, at midday, London -0.8%. Paris -0.6%. Frankfurt -1.3%.

Equities yesterday: U.S. stocks finished mixed Thursday as investors continued rotating out of high-growth technology shares and into more defensive blue-chip names ahead of closely watched inflation data and next week’s quarter-end portfolio repositioning.

The Dow rose 71.72 points, or 0.14%, to close at 51,920.62, extending its run of record highs. The gains reflected continued buying in industrial, financial and healthcare stocks, sectors viewed as relatively attractive after the market’s powerful technology-led advance during the first half of the year.

The S&P 500 was essentially unchanged, slipping just 0.73 points, or 0.01%, to 7,357.49, illustrating the market’s lack of broad direction. While gains in economically sensitive and defensive sectors offset much of the weakness in technology, the benchmark index lacked enough momentum to extend its recent rally.

The Nasdaq underperformed, falling 118.03 points, or 0.46%, to 25,358.60 as investors took profits in several large-cap technology and artificial intelligence names following weeks of outsized gains. The pullback came despite continued optimism surrounding AI investment and semiconductor demand, suggesting investors were locking in profits rather than fundamentally changing their outlook for the sector.

Thursday’s mixed performance followed strong earnings and upbeat guidance from major semiconductor companies earlier in the week that had helped fuel the AI trade. However, with many technology stocks trading at historically rich valuations, investors appeared willing to rotate capital into sectors that have lagged the broader market.

Market participants also remained cautious ahead of additional inflation and economic data that could influence expectations for Federal Reserve policy later this year. While recent inflation reports have generally reinforced expectations for eventual interest-rate cuts, investors continue to watch for signs that price pressures are moderating sufficiently to give policymakers greater confidence.

For agricultural markets, the relatively stable performance in equities and continued investor confidence in the broader economy remain constructive for commodity demand. However, the technology-led pause underscores that financial markets are becoming more selective after a strong first-half rally, with investors increasingly rewarding earnings quality and valuation discipline rather than simply chasing momentum.

The divergence between the Dow and Nasdaq also reflects a broader shift toward portfolio diversification as institutional investors prepare for the second half of 2026, balancing enthusiasm for AI-related growth with exposure to more cyclical and value-oriented sectors that could benefit if economic growth remains resilient.

Equity
Index
Closing Price 
June 25
Point Difference 
from June 24
% Difference 
from June 24
Dow51,920.62+71.72+0.14%
Nasdaq25,358.60-118.03-0.46%
S&P 5007,357.49-0.73-0.01%
AG MARKETS

Overnight grain markets weaken as weather and harvest pressure build

Wheat leads declines while soy complex eases ahead of key USDA reports

Overnight grain futures traded broadly lower, with wheat posting the sharpest losses as improving harvest conditions in parts of the U.S. Plains and Black Sea export competition continued to weigh on prices. Corn and soybean futures also moved lower as traders adjusted positions ahead of next week’s USDA planted acreage and quarterly grain stocks reports while continuing to monitor weather developments across North America and Europe.

July corn futures fell 2¼ cents to $4.12½ per bushel. Corn has surrendered some of Thursday’s gains as the market balances generally favorable U.S. crop conditions against mounting concerns over heat and dryness in portions of Europe. While recent forecasts continue to call for periodic rainfall across much of the central Corn Belt, traders remain focused on whether northwestern Iowa, Nebraska and parts of the western Midwest receive enough moisture as temperatures trend above normal into early July. With the U.S. crop entering a critical growth phase, weather will remain the dominant driver after next week’s USDA reports.

July soybeans declined 6¾ cents to $11.20¾, while July soybean meal dropped $3.80 to $304.40 per short ton. July soybean oil fell 0.65 cent to 70.16 cents per pound. The soybean complex is giving back part of Thursday’s strong advance as traders await confirmation of additional Chinese buying interest after reports Beijing recently sought U.S. soybean price quotations. Market participants are also watching developments in Argentina, where labor tensions at oilseed processing facilities could disrupt soybean meal and soybean oil exports if strike threats materialize next week. Even so, expectations for adequate U.S. crop development are limiting fresh buying interest.

Wheat futures again led the downside, with July Chicago soft red winter wheat falling 11½ cents to $5.79½ and July Kansas City hard red winter wheat losing 11¼ cents to $6.09¼. Harvest pressure continues to build across the southern Plains as weather disruptions ease, while competitively priced Russian wheat continues to dominate export business. Recent rainfall across Kansas may slow harvest in localized areas, but it is also expected to improve soil moisture ahead of planting for next season. Meanwhile, deteriorating crop conditions across France and other parts of Europe remain a longer-term supportive factor, suggesting global wheat supplies outside the Black Sea region could tighten later this year.

Overall, grain markets remain caught between near-term seasonal pressure and longer-term production uncertainty. Favorable U.S. weather forecasts, active harvest progress and aggressive Black Sea competition are weighing on prices today, but growing crop stress across Europe, the potential for increased Chinese purchases of U.S. soybeans, and next week’s major USDA reports could quickly shift market sentiment.

European heat wave raises new concerns for corn supply

French crop conditions deteriorate rapidly as drought expands across Europe

An intense and persistent heat wave across Western Europe is becoming a growing concern for global grain markets after French corn conditions suffered one of their sharpest weekly declines of the season.

France’s good-to-excellent corn rating dropped 9 percentage points to 76%, the weakest rating for this point in the growing season since 2018, highlighting how quickly crops can deteriorate when high temperatures coincide with limited soil moisture. While 76% still reflects a crop with considerable production potential, the pace of the decline suggests yield risks are mounting if rainfall does not arrive soon.

French wheat has also begun to show signs of stress, with good-to-excellent ratings slipping to 74% from 76% a week earlier. Even so, the wheat crop remains in better condition than last year, when ratings stood at 68%, indicating that wheat production losses may be more limited than those expected for corn. Wheat in France is generally further advanced in development and therefore less vulnerable to the current heat than corn, which is entering one of its most yield-sensitive growth stages.

Perhaps the most market-sensitive development is the French agriculture ministry’s indication that 2026 corn production could fall roughly 30% from last year. That estimate reflects both a reduction in planted acreage and deteriorating crop prospects from drought. Importantly, many analysts believe even that projection assumes weather conditions stabilize during July. Current medium-range forecasts suggest that assumption may prove optimistic, with continued above-normal temperatures and below-normal rainfall expected across much of France and neighboring Spain.

The concern extends well beyond France. Forecast models increasingly point toward another expansion of extreme heat into Central and Eastern Europe, including Germany, Poland, Hungary, Romania and Ukraine. Those countries collectively represent a substantial share of European corn production, meaning additional weather deterioration could significantly tighten overall EU feed grain supplies.

For world grain markets, the implications extend beyond Europe. The European Union is already one of the world’s largest corn importers in years of reduced domestic production. Should weather continue to deteriorate, import demand would likely increase further, benefiting exporters such as Argentina and potentially the United States, particularly during the latter part of the marketing year when U.S. export availability becomes more competitive. Larger EU purchases could provide additional support for U.S. corn export demand at a time when traders are closely monitoring prospects for a large North American harvest.

The European weather situation also comes as global feed grain supplies face several competing uncertainties, including Black Sea weather risks and South American export logistics. While it remains too early to quantify ultimate production losses, the rapid decline in French crop ratings serves as an early warning that Europe’s production outlook is becoming increasingly weather dependent. Unless meaningful rainfall develops over the next two to three weeks, analysts are likely to continue trimming EU corn production estimates while raising import forecasts, a combination that could provide an increasingly supportive backdrop for global corn prices later this summer.

International grain markets weaken as weather and harvest pressure build

European wheat and corn retreat while Russian offers hold steady

International grain markets were mostly lower on June 26 as favorable Northern Hemisphere harvest progress and continued pressure from improving Black Sea export availability outweighed mounting concerns over heat stress in parts of Western Europe. While the longer-term weather outlook remains supportive for weather-risk premiums, traders continue to focus on expanding harvest supplies and stiff export competition.

Paris September milling wheat futures fell €2.50 to €203.50 per metric ton, equivalent to roughly $236 per metric ton (about $6.42 per bushel using current exchange rates). That remains competitive with U.S. and Black Sea export values, although the decline reflects ongoing harvest pressure and expectations that French production will recover from last year’s weather-damaged crop despite recent heat and dryness.

Paris August corn futures slipped €0.50 to €227.50 per metric ton, equivalent to approximately $264 per metric ton or about $6.70 per bushel. Despite the modest decline, European corn continues to trade at a premium to U.S. Gulf values because of concerns that the current heat wave across France and portions of Central Europe could trim yield potential if meaningful rainfall does not develop during pollination. Those weather concerns are preventing a more pronounced selloff even as futures softened Friday.

Russian July FOB wheat offers were unchanged at $232 per metric ton (roughly $6.31 per bushel), underscoring Russia’s continued role as the world’s lowest-cost major wheat exporter. Stable Black Sea offers continue to cap rallies in both European and U.S. wheat despite weather concerns in portions of the EU and Plains. As Russian harvest activity accelerates, buyers continue to view Black Sea wheat as the benchmark against which other export origins must compete.

Malaysian August palm oil futures rose 4 ringgit to 4,539 ringgit per metric ton, equivalent to approximately US$1,070 per metric ton. The modest gain provided underlying support for competing vegetable oils, including soybean oil, although the move was relatively subdued as traders balanced firm energy prices against expectations for seasonally increasing Southeast Asian palm oil production.

Overall, international grain markets remain caught between two competing forces. In the near term, expanding wheat harvests in the Northern Hemisphere and aggressive Black Sea export pricing continue to pressure values. However, persistent heat across portions of Western and Central Europe, along with forecasts calling for limited precipitation into early July, leaves the market vulnerable to renewed weather-driven buying should crop conditions deteriorate further. That combination suggests wheat and corn prices are likely to remain volatile as traders balance abundant near-term supplies against increasing production risks for late-developing crops.

Cotton AWP moves higher. The Adjusted World Price (AWP) for cotton is at 63.88 cents per pound, effective today (June 26), up from 62.37 cents per pound the prior week.

U.S. hog inventory slips slightly as breeding herd continues to shrink

Breeding herd shrinks further as litter sizes hit a March-May record

The U.S. inventory of all hogs and pigs totaled 73.7 million head on June 1, 2026, down slightly from a year earlier and down slightly from March 1, 2026, according to the Quarterly Hogs and Pigs report released Thursday afternoon by USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS).

Breeding herd. Of the 73.7 million head on farms, 67.8 million were market hogs and 5.88 million were kept for breeding. The breeding inventory was down 1% from last year and down slightly from the previous quarter, while market hog inventory was up slightly from a year earlier but down slightly from the March count. The mix suggests a swine herd holding roughly steady in total even as producers continue to trim sow numbers at the margins.

Pig crop and litter size. Producers weaned 33.5 million pigs between March and May, up slightly from the same period in 2025, even though sows farrowing during the quarter fell 1% to 2.82 million head. The gain came entirely from productivity: the average litter size of 11.87 pigs per sow set a record for the March-May period, up from 11.75 a year earlier, extending a run of litter-size records NASS has logged in recent quarters as genetics and management continue to outpace any decline in sow numbers.

Farrowing intentions. Producers told NASS they intend to farrow 2.90 million sows during June-August, down 2% from actual farrowings in the same period last year, and 2.89 million sows during September-November, down 1 percent from a year earlier. Both figures point to a breeding herd that is contracting gradually rather than expanding, consistent with the modest year-over-year declines already evident in the breeding inventory.

State breakdown. Iowa remained the largest hog state by a wide margin, with a June 1 inventory of 24.7 million head, followed by Minnesota at 9.30 million head and North Carolina at 7.20 million head. North Carolina’s herd was down from 7.60 million head a year earlier, a steeper year-over-year decline than the national average and one of the more notable state-level moves in the report.

Market reaction. August lean hog futures fell $0.10 to $96.60, nearer the daily high on Thursday, down roughly 17% from a year earlier on CME data, and trade was mixed on spread positioning as traders squared up ahead of Thursday’s release. The numbers offer a mixed signal for the board: the year-over-year decline in breeding stock and the below-year-ago farrowing intentions for both the summer and fall quarters are the kind of incremental tightening that has historically supported deferred contracts, but a record-setting pig crop and a market hog inventory running slightly above last year argue against any sharp near-term rally. Traders are likely to treat this report as confirmation of the slow, grinding herd contraction already underway in 2026 rather than a fresh catalyst, with the more market-moving detail being the softer farrowing intentions that will shape hog supply expectations heading into 2027.

Survey methodology. NASS based the report on a survey of 4,254 U.S. hog and pig producers, with roughly 2,700 operations responding during the first half of June. Producers reported data through electronic reporting, mail, telephone and face-to-face interviews, with all responses referenced to inventories as of June 1, 2026.

Ag markets Thur., June 25: grains and livestock rebound ahead of key USDA reports

Short covering, bargain buying and positioning drive broad ag market gains

Agricultural futures finished mostly higher on June 25 as traders shifted from an early defensive posture to broad-based buying ahead of next week’s closely watched USDA planted acreage and quarterly grain stocks reports. A weaker U.S. dollar added support across much of the commodity complex, while short covering and bargain hunting helped lift markets that had recently fallen to multi-month or contract lows.

Corn staged one of the day’s most impressive reversals. December futures settled 8 1/4 cents higher at $4.43 after falling to a new contract low early in the session. The recovery reflected aggressive short covering by speculative traders as well as value buying from commercial participants who viewed prices below $4.40 as attractive ahead of Tuesday’s USDA reports. Market attention is increasingly focused on acreage expectations, with many analysts anticipating soybean plantings increased at the expense of corn because of superior spring profitability. Even so, weather remains largely favorable across much of the Corn Belt, limiting enthusiasm for a sustained weather-driven rally.

Soybeans led the grain complex higher as November futures climbed 22 cents to $11.57, while September soybean meal gained $4.60 and soybean oil advanced 131 points. The rally was fueled by a combination of short covering, end-of-quarter position evening and bargain buying after recent weakness. Additional support came from reports that China is seeking bids for U.S. soybeans for September-forward shipment, reinforcing expectations that Beijing intends to continue meeting its commitment to purchase significant volumes of U.S. soybeans under the latest bilateral trade understandings. Traders also monitored reports that workers at Argentina’s major soybean crushing and export facilities could begin strike action next week over wage negotiations. While labor disruptions in Argentina have historically been relatively short-lived, even a brief interruption in the world’s largest soybean meal and soybean oil export hub could temporarily shift export demand toward the United States and Brazil, helping underpin soybean product prices. Even with those supportive developments, traders remain cautious until USDA provides updated acreage estimates and grain stocks data next Tuesday.

Wheat futures also recovered from early weakness. December Chicago soft red winter wheat gained 5 1/2 cents, while Kansas City hard red winter wheat added 5 cents after posting a nine-week low earlier in the day. The strength largely reflected spillover buying from corn and soybeans together with technical short covering following several sessions of selling pressure. Minneapolis spring wheat remained the weakest segment, slipping modestly as favorable northern Plains crop conditions continue to weigh on production prospects.

Cotton futures posted a corrective rebound, with December cotton advancing 71 points to 76.97 cents. The weaker dollar improved U.S. export competitiveness, while firmer crude oil prices lent support to fiber markets. Even so, traders remain cautious given uncertain global textile demand and the prospect of another sizable U.S. crop.

Livestock markets remained firm, led by live cattle. August live cattle futures gained 70 cents while feeder cattle ended only modestly higher after reaching a six-week high during the session. Underlying support continues to come from historically tight cattle supplies and concerns that detections of New World screwworm in Texas could further disrupt cattle movement and beef supplies if additional restrictions become necessary. Cash cattle and boxed beef values remain supportive of the broader bullish fundamental outlook.

Lean hog futures eased slightly, with August contracts slipping 10 cents in what appeared to be routine profit-taking after recent gains. Despite Thursday’s minor setback, the market remains technically improved, and another strong close could reinforce the view that hog futures have established a seasonal bottom.

The broader market tone suggests traders are becoming increasingly reluctant to add new short positions immediately ahead of Tuesday’s USDA data. Acreage revisions, quarterly grain inventories and updated demand expectations could significantly reshape price direction entering July. Until then, much of Thursday’s action reflected risk management rather than a meaningful shift in underlying supply-and-demand fundamentals. The sharp recovery from early lows nevertheless signals that value-oriented buyers are becoming more active as new-crop grain prices approach levels that could discourage additional producer selling.

CommodityContract MonthJune 25 CloseDifference from June 24
CornDecember$4.43+8 1/4¢
SoybeansNovember$11.57+22¢
Soybean MealSeptember$303.60+$4.60
Soybean OilSeptember68.58¢+131 points
SRW WheatDecember$6.18 1/4+5 1/2¢
HRW WheatDecember$6.45 3/4+5¢
Spring WheatSeptember$6.15-1 3/4¢
CottonDecember76.97¢+71 points
Live CattleAugust247.225+0.70
Feeder CattleAugust373.30+0.375
Lean HogsAugust96.60-0.10
FARM POLICY

Proposition 12 speculation clouds Senate farm bill path

Rumored House-Senate strategy raises doubts about floor support

As the Senate Ag Committee moves closer to advancing its version of a long-awaited farm bill, a growing undercurrent of concern is emerging among lawmakers over an issue that is not even included in the committee draft: Proposition 12. Several senators believe Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-Ark.) has reached at least an informal understanding with House Agriculture Committee Chairman GT Thompson (R-Pa.) to address Proposition 12 during a House-Senate conference committee rather than in the Senate bill itself. Whether that perception is accurate may prove less important than the political consequences it is already creating.

The House-passed farm bill includes language designed to limit the reach of California’s Proposition 12, the voter-approved animal housing law that has reshaped pork production and interstate commerce. That provision has long been a top priority for many livestock organizations and producers who argue the California law effectively imposes one state’s production standards on farmers across the country. However, it remains one of the most divisive issues in agricultural policy, drawing strong opposition from animal welfare groups and several senators representing states where Proposition 12 enjoys political support.

The Senate committee draft deliberately leaves the issue untouched, allowing Boozman to avoid a fight that could fracture the bipartisan coalition needed to move the legislation through committee. But several senators privately question whether the omission is simply tactical. They believe the strategy is to secure Senate passage first and then negotiate Proposition 12 language behind closed doors during conference with the House, where Thompson has consistently argued the issue must be resolved in a final farm bill.

That belief is creating unease among senators who might otherwise support the legislation. For some lawmakers, a vote for the Senate bill could become, in their view, a vote to keep Proposition 12 alive for later negotiations. Even if no formal agreement exists between the two chairmen, the suspicion alone could influence voting decisions.

The political arithmetic is particularly delicate because the Senate cannot afford to lose many supporters if the measure reaches the floor. Senators opposed to reopening the Proposition 12 debate may decide that defeating the bill outright is preferable to allowing it to advance into a conference where compromises become far more difficult to stop. Conversely, livestock-state senators who strongly support overturning Proposition 12 may ultimately view conference negotiations as their best opportunity to secure policy changes unavailable through the Senate drafting process.

Boozman faces the difficult task of reassuring both camps without undermining future negotiating flexibility. Publicly committing that Proposition 12 will never be considered in conference could weaken the Senate’s bargaining position with the House. Yet declining to provide assurances risks reinforcing suspicions that a side agreement already exists.

For Thompson, maintaining Proposition 12 language in the House bill strengthens his leverage in any eventual negotiations. House leaders have repeatedly argued that livestock producers need national standards to prevent individual states from dictating production practices beyond their borders. That position enjoys strong backing from many pork and cattle groups but remains politically toxic for several Senate Democrats and some Republicans.

The broader lesson is that conference committees often become the venue where the most contentious agricultural policy disputes are resolved. Experienced lawmakers understand that provisions omitted from one chamber’s bill are not necessarily dead. That reality explains why rumors surrounding Proposition 12 have gained traction even before the Senate has completed its own work.

Whether the speculation reflects an actual understanding between Boozman and Thompson or simply Capitol Hill rumor, it has become a political factor in its own right. If enough senators conclude that Proposition 12 is destined to reappear in conference, that perception alone could complicate efforts to assemble the bipartisan coalition needed to pass the Senate bill. In that sense, the controversy surrounding legislation that is not currently in the Senate draft may ultimately become one of the biggest obstacles to getting the bill to conference in the first place.

ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY

Friday: Oil slides as Hormuz traffic rebounds and Gulf exports recover

Expanded shipping and rising OPEC output ease geopolitical risk premium

WTI Crude oil prices fell nearly 4% Friday to around $69 per barrel, the lowest level since late February, as traders continued to remove the geopolitical risk premium that had been built into the market during the recent conflict involving Iran. The sharp decline reflected growing confidence that energy supplies from the Persian Gulf will continue to move despite lingering security concerns. Brent crude oil also declined around 4% to just over $72 per barrel. 

A key driver has been the rapid recovery in shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, where vessel traffic has accelerated following progress toward a U.S.-Iran ceasefire. Export flows have reportedly recovered to roughly 75% of pre-conflict levels, reducing fears of a prolonged disruption to one of the world’s most important oil transit chokepoints. An important milestone came as Saudi Arabia resumed loading crude tankers at its Ras Tanura export terminal, signaling that the kingdom is prepared to restore exports and potentially increase production.

The market briefly rebounded Thursday after the container ship Ever Lovely was struck by a projectile southeast of Oman, renewing concerns over maritime security. However, the incident did not disrupt commercial shipping, and President Donald Trump said the Strait of Hormuz remains open and vessel traffic has continued. The absence of any sustained interruption reinforced the view that the attack was an isolated event rather than the start of a broader campaign against commercial shipping.

Meanwhile, several major Gulf producers are increasing exports. The United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar are moving additional crude into world markets, although tanker availability has become a logistical constraint. Iraq is also pressing for a higher OPEC production quota to recover export revenues lost during the conflict, adding to expectations that more barrels could reach the market in the months ahead.

The combination of improving supply, uninterrupted shipping and easing geopolitical tensions has shifted market attention back to underlying fundamentals, including ample global inventories and uncertain demand growth. With crude on track for roughly a 10% weekly decline—its steepest drop in about a month—the market is signaling that the immediate threat of a major supply shock has diminished, even as traders continue to monitor developments in the Persian Gulf for any renewed security risks.

U.S./CANADA RELATIONS

Bridge dispute becomes another front in U.S./Canada negotiations

Delayed opening underscores Trump’s willingness to revisit past deals

Bloomberg report (link) that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick delayed the opening of the Gordie Howe International Bridge while seeking a larger U.S. share of future toll revenue appears to fit the broader negotiating strategy the Trump administration has employed across trade and infrastructure issues, although some of the article’s most detailed claims remain based on unnamed sources.

The most significant point in ˆreporting — that the United States requested postponing the bridge’s opening — is no longer in serious dispute. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney publicly acknowledged earlier this month that Canada agreed to delay the opening at Washington’s request while both governments worked through unresolved issues. Likewise, the White House has publicly confirmed that Lutnick has taken the lead in the negotiations, lending credibility to Bloomberg’s central premise.

Where Bloomberg advances the story is its reporting that Lutnick is pressing Canada to renegotiate the existing toll-sharing arrangement. According to the article, the administration wants a greater share of future toll revenue than provided under the current agreement. The Commerce Department has not confirmed that specific objective, but neither has it denied it, saying only that Lutnick is committed to securing “the best possible deal for America.”

That position would be consistent with President Donald Trump’s longstanding criticism of the bridge agreement. Trump argued earlier this year that Canada received too favorable a financial arrangement after paying the bridge’s construction costs while retaining toll revenues until those costs are recovered. He has repeatedly suggested that the United States deserves greater compensation because the bridge’s economic value ultimately depends on access to the American market.

From a negotiating standpoint, the bridge has become much more than an infrastructure project. The administration increasingly views individual economic agreements as leverage within broader trade negotiations, much as it has approached tariffs, investment agreements and market-access discussions with several trading partners. Rather than accepting previous agreements as fixed, the White House has demonstrated a willingness to reopen negotiations whenever it believes additional concessions can be obtained.

Whether that strategy succeeds is another question. Canada financed the C$6.4 billion (approximately $4.5 billion) project largely because earlier efforts involving both governments repeatedly stalled. The current ownership and toll arrangements were negotiated years ago to make construction possible. Reopening those terms after construction has been completed could create concerns among future infrastructure partners about whether negotiated agreements remain durable after political leadership changes.

For agriculture and other industries, the timing is significant. The Detroit/Windsor crossing is one of North America’s most important commercial gateways, handling large volumes of agricultural commodities, food products, livestock, fertilizer, automotive parts and manufactured goods. The new bridge is expected to improve freight efficiency and reduce congestion once it opens. A prolonged delay therefore carries economic costs beyond the political dispute over toll revenues.

The bridge negotiations also arrive amid broader uncertainty in the U.S./Canada relationship. The Trump administration is reviewing the future of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement while continuing discussions over tariffs, market access and other bilateral trade issues. That broader backdrop makes it difficult to separate the bridge dispute from the larger economic negotiations underway between the two governments.

One portion of Bloomberg’s article deserves careful treatment. The story notes that the owners of the competing Ambassador Bridge recently made a significant contribution to a Trump-aligned political organization. While that contribution has been publicly reported, no evidence has emerged showing it influenced the administration’s handling of the Gordie Howe Bridge negotiations. Bloomberg does not claim such proof exists, and no public investigation has established a direct connection.

Overall, Bloomberg’s reporting appears substantially accurate based on the public record. The delay itself, Lutnick’s leadership role and the administration’s desire to revisit aspects of the agreement are all supported by official statements or previous reporting. The specific details regarding changes to toll-sharing arrangements rely primarily on anonymous sources, but they are consistent with President Trump’s previously stated views and the administration’s broader negotiating philosophy of using economic leverage to seek more favorable terms for the United States.

LABOR & IMMIGRATION POLICY 

AFBF to spotlight farm labor crisis as workforce debate intensifies

Farm labor reform push comes as growers face mounting cost pressures

The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) will focus attention on one of agriculture’s most pressing policy issues when it hosts a virtual briefing on Monday, June 29, at 11:00 a.m. EDT, featuring AFBF President Zippy Duvall, Farm Bureau policy experts and farmers from Arizona, New York, North Carolina, California and Alabama to discuss the industry’s labor shortages and the future of Rep. GT Thompson’s (R-Pa.) Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.

The event comes at a time when labor has become one of the defining cost and competitiveness issues facing U.S. agriculture. While the H-2A temporary agricultural worker program has expanded rapidly over the past decade, many producers argue it has become increasingly expensive and administratively burdensome, leaving large segments of agriculture — including livestock, dairy, specialty crops and diversified farms — without a practical workforce solution.

Farm Bureau is expected to highlight how escalating Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWR), housing and transportation mandates, regulatory compliance costs and lengthy administrative requirements have driven total labor expenses sharply higher. Those costs are arriving at a particularly difficult time as many farmers confront lower commodity prices, elevated interest rates and still-high input expenses, squeezing already thin operating margins.

The briefing also serves as another opportunity for supporters to build momentum behind the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act, legislation championed by Thompson. The proposal seeks to modernize the H-2A program by streamlining application procedures, providing greater flexibility for employers and creating a pathway to legal status for experienced agricultural workers already employed in the industry. Supporters contend the legislation would provide greater labor certainty while strengthening border security through a legal workforce framework.

Although the bill has received broad backing from many agricultural organizations, including Farm Bureau, significant political hurdles remain. Immigration reform continues to divide Congress, and any agricultural workforce package must navigate broader debates over border security, employment verification and legal immigration. Even proposals narrowly focused on agriculture have historically struggled to gain sufficient bipartisan support despite widespread agreement that labor shortages threaten domestic food production.

The geographic diversity of farmers participating in Monday’s discussion — from Arizona, California and North Carolina to Alabama and New York—is likely intended to demonstrate that labor challenges extend well beyond fruit and vegetable production. Labor shortages increasingly affect nursery operations, dairy farms, livestock producers and other labor-intensive sectors across virtually every region of the country.

The discussion could also help shape the debate heading into the second half of the year as Congress weighs broader agricultural priorities. With many producers warning that workforce availability has become as critical as weather and input costs to maintaining production, Farm Bureau will likely argue that labor reform has evolved from a regional concern into a national competitiveness issue for U.S. agriculture.

WEATHER

— NWS outlook: Heavy rainfall and severe storms continue across portions of the Central U.S. the next few days; with expansion across Eastern U.S by Saturday… …Heat starts to build across the Southern U.S. by Saturday, while below normal temperatures spread from the West into the Northern Plains and Rockies… …Extremely Critical Fire Weather risk over parts of the central Great Basin and Southwest Friday; fire weather conditions continue this weekend.

Heavy rains reshape wheat outlook as heat builds across Corn Belt

Flooding aids drought areas but raises quality concerns as heat follows

An unusually intense weather system is delivering one of the most consequential moisture events of the growing season across the central U.S., bringing major relief to drought-stressed areas of the hard red winter wheat belt while also creating new concerns over flooding, harvest delays and grain quality. The heaviest rainfall has fallen across south-central and southeastern Kansas, where widespread totals of 1.5 to 3 inches and isolated amounts of 5 to 6 inches near Wichita have triggered flash flooding and pushed parts of the state into one of their five wettest Junes on record.

For wheat producers, the rainfall is arriving at a mixed stage of the crop cycle. While moisture will benefit recently planted double-crop soybeans, replenish depleted soil moisture and improve prospects for fall wheat establishment, it is less welcome for mature hard red winter wheat that is awaiting harvest. Fields that were nearly ready for combines could face significant delays, and prolonged wet conditions increase the risk of lodging, sprouting and declines in test weight and milling quality. Exporters and millers will closely monitor quality reports from Kansas, the nation’s largest hard red winter wheat-producing state.

The storm system is now shifting eastward, with flood watches extending across portions of Missouri, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio. Those areas could see localized flooding before the system lifts northward over the weekend. As a warm front advances Saturday into Sunday, scattered thunderstorms are expected to spread across much of the Corn Belt, providing additional rainfall to corn and soybean areas that have recently experienced uneven moisture.

Looking into next week, forecasters expect a more active weather regime to develop across the central Plains and western Corn Belt. Multiple rounds of nighttime thunderstorms are forecast to target northwestern Iowa and northern Nebraska, areas that have remained among the most moisture-deficient sections of the Corn Belt. If those storms materialize as projected, they could significantly improve crop conditions ahead of the critical pollination period for corn.

However, the moisture pattern will be accompanied by increasing heat. Beginning Monday and continuing through around July 3, temperatures are expected to average 4 to 8 degrees above normal across much of the Midwest, with anomalies of 8 to 10 degrees above normal near the Great Lakes. Afternoon highs are projected to reach the upper 80s to mid-90s across much of the Corn Belt, while portions of the southern Plains, Mid-South and Southeast could exceed 95 degrees.

From a market perspective, traders are likely to focus on whether the forecast thunderstorms verify across the western Corn Belt. Timely rainfall would reduce immediate stress on corn entering pollination and soybeans entering key vegetative growth stages, potentially limiting weather premium in grain futures. Conversely, if the anticipated precipitation underperforms while the heat intensifies, markets could quickly rebuild weather risk premiums during the first half of July.

Forecast models also suggest an active “ridge-rider” pattern developing during the July 6-10 period, with storm systems tracking around the northern edge of a western U.S. high-pressure ridge. Such patterns often produce repeated rounds of thunderstorms across the northern Plains and upper Midwest while allowing heat to persist farther south, making early July a pivotal period for both crop development and grain market direction.