U.S. Hiring Downshifts: June Payrolls Rise Just 57,000 as Leisure Sector Gives Back World Cup Gains; Treasury Yields Retreat as Weak Payrolls Temper Fed Hike Bets
Late reporting key component of market-year high beef export sales | NWS case count rises, but Zavala shift marks first containment milestone | Colorado River crisis puts California’s water dominance under scrutiny | Large banks pull back on farm operating credit even as ag lenders keep expanding
| LINKS |
Link: NCGA’s Corn Strategy Pivots from Defending Demand to Creating It
Link: Video: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, June 28
Video show is now on You Tube,Spotify & Apple
Link: Audio: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, June 28
| Updates: Policy/News/Markets, July 2, 2026 |
| UP FRONT |
TOP STORIES
— Hiring downshifts as June payrolls rise just 57,000: Weak job growth and downward revisions signal a cooler labor market, complicating Fed rate-hike expectations.
— Treasury yields retreat as weak payrolls temper Fed-hike bets: The 10-year yield slipped as soft hiring data reduced urgency for another Fed rate hike.
— NWS case count rises, but Zavala shift marks first containment milestone: New Crockett County cases show continued spread, while Zavala’s inactive status signals containment progress.
— Moroccan phosphate duty pause now formally in Federal Register: The tariff pause is procedural but offers near-term phosphate fertilizer cost relief for growers.
— EPA opens door to new crop desiccation tools: EPA’s RFI starts work on a $30 million challenge for alternatives to conventional chemical desiccants.
— Colorado River crisis puts California’s water dominance under scrutiny: Shrinking river flows are intensifying pressure on California cities, Imperial Valley agriculture and basinwide water-sharing rules.
FINANCIAL MARKETS
— Equities today: U.S. Dow opened higher as weak jobs data eased Fed-hike concerns, though chip-sector weakness remains a risk.
— Equities yesterday: The Dow, Nasdaq and S&P 500 all closed lower July 1, led by pressure in growth and technology shares.
— General Mills turns to deeper cost cuts as sales recovery remains fragile: The company’s improved quarter was overshadowed by cautious guidance and a $3 billion cost-savings plan.
— Warsh eases inflation alarm, but not the Fed’s price-stability line: Warsh acknowledged easing inflation risks but maintained the Fed’s firm commitment to 2% inflation.
U.S. AG ECONOMY
— Large banks pull back on farm operating credit even as ag lenders keep expanding: KC Fed data show selective credit tightening, especially for production loans at larger banks.
AG MARKETS
— Late reporting key component of market-year high beef export sales: USDA’s record beef sales figure was heavily inflated by late-reported activity.
— Why late reporting drove the beef export sales record and why the headline overstates demand: The beef sales surge appears to reflect compliance catch-up rather than fresh buying strength.
— U.S. ag export sales to China marked by sorghum, old-crop soybean, beef and pork business: China showed activity across several commodities, though no new-crop soybean sales were reported.
— Grains firm overnight as soy complex leads modest follow-through buying: Soybeans led modest overnight gains, with corn and wheat also firmer.
— International grain prices mixed as Black Sea wheat pressure builds: Paris corn firmed, wheat held steady and softer Russian offers kept pressure on global wheat values.
— Record May crush extends soy demand strength: USDA data showed record May soybean crush and corn-for-ethanol use, underscoring firm domestic demand.
— Ag market recap for Wed., July 1, grains extend post-USDA rally while livestock futures fade: Grains strengthened on acreage, stocks and weather risk, while livestock futures pulled back.
FERTILIZER
— USDA fertilizer push shifts focus from grant promises to real production: USDA’s $500 million FIELDS program targets shovel-ready domestic fertilizer capacity, though benefits will take time.
ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY
— Crude breaks lower as Hormuz risk premium evaporates: Oil fell as Gulf supply flows improved, though low U.S. inventories keep upside risk alive.
— 45Z feedstock rule is a step, not the finish line: USDA’s rule helps define lower-carbon feedstocks but does not guarantee farmer premiums without further tax guidance and market pass-through.
— Ethanol strength becomes a corn market wild card: Ethanol prices remain resilient despite weaker crude, supporting strong corn demand and plant bidding power.
WEATHER
— Corn Belt forecast turns drier, tempering flood risk but raising mid-July crop questions: Near-term storms remain a risk, but a drier 11- to 15-day outlook could shift attention toward crop stress.
— Super El Niño adds another layer of weather risk for agriculture: A potentially very strong El Niño raises volatility risks, though markets will respond most to actual crop-weather impacts.
| TOP STORIES—Hiring downshifts: June payrolls rise just 57,000 as leisure sector gives back World Cup gainsWeakest job growth in four months lands in Kevin Warsh’s lap as markets weigh whether a cooling labor market derails a September rate hike The headline miss: The U.S. economy added 57,000 jobs in June, well below the downwardly revised 129,000 in May and far short of the roughly 110,000 economists expected. It was the smallest monthly gain since February and snapped a run of three consecutive upside surprises — payroll growth had smashed expectations in March, April and May, a stretch that had convinced many at the Fed the labor market was stabilizing or even improving. Yet context matters: the June figure is roughly in line with the anemic 36,000 average monthly gain over the prior 12 months, a reminder that the spring hiring surge — not the June slowdown — may have been the aberration. The revisions sting. Beyond the headline miss, April and May payrolls were revised down by a combined 74,000, a sharp reversal from the prior report, which had revised March and April up by a combined 93,000. The whipsaw underscores how unsettled the underlying data remain and revives questions about the reliability of initial prints — a familiar theme for anyone following the survey response-rate problems that have dogged federal statistical agencies. Taken together, the level of employment is now meaningfully lower than markets believed just a month ago. Where the weakness lives. The most striking detail is the 61,000-job plunge in leisure and hospitality, reflecting weaker-than-usual seasonal hiring. This looks like classic payback: leisure and hospitality added 70,000 jobs in May — mostly food services and drinking places — as stadiums, bars and restaurants staffed up for the World Cup, and forecasters had warned May’s surge may have been driven by the World Cup or Memorial Day calendar timing, with June at risk of payback. The June ADP report foreshadowed the softness, showing leisure and hospitality adding just 2,000 positions, continuing a slow year for an industry seen as a barometer of underlying consumer demand. Where the strength lives — and why it’s narrow. Gains were once again concentrated in the usual trio: professional and business services (+36,000), social assistance (+25,000) and health care (+22,000). Everything else — mining, construction, manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, transportation, information, financial activities and government — was essentially flat. This extends the “narrow breadth” problem economists have flagged all year. The low-hire, low-fire equilibrium remains intact: Challenger reported layoffs planned by U.S. employers dropped 53% to 45,849 in June, with first-half job cuts down 40% from a year earlier, while JOLTS data showed 7.6 million openings in May and an unchanged quits rate of 1.9%. Employers aren’t shedding workers, but they aren’t adding them either — and the share of consumers viewing jobs as “hard to get” rose in June to the highest level in nearly five and a half years. The Fed calculus. This is the first major data test of the Warsh Fed’s inflation-first posture. Speaking Wednesday at the ECB’s Sintra forum, Warsh declined to signal the July meeting outcome but stressed that prices remain too high, and heading into the report, markets were pricing in slightly better than two-in-three odds of a 25-basis-point rate hike in September — pared back from near-certainty immediately after the June policy decision (see more below). A 57,000 print with negative revisions gives the doves ammunition and should further trim those hike odds, though the case isn’t clean: if the Fed’s breakeven payroll pace really is near zero given slower labor force growth, even 57,000 keeps the unemployment picture stable. Warsh has deliberately withheld forward guidance, raising the odds of outsized market volatility around each data point — and today’s report is exactly the kind of ambiguous release that new regime invites markets to fight over. Bottom line for agriculture. For farm country, the read-through runs mainly through rates and the dollar. A softer jobs print that dents September hike expectations should pressure the greenback — a tailwind for U.S. ag export competitiveness after the euro’s slide to one-year lows below $1.1400 on the Fed’s hawkish tilt. It also eases, at the margin, the upward pressure on borrowing costs facing a farm sector already contending with elevated input prices from the Iran conflict’s fertilizer and energy shocks. But one soft month won’t settle the debate. With Warsh’s Fed refusing to tip its hand, the July CPI report and the August payrolls print now carry even more weight. —Treasury yields retreat as weak payrolls temper Fed-hike betsThe June jobs report gave bond buyers fresh evidence of labor-market cooling, but Warsh’s inflation-first message keeps the policy outlook from turning dovish The 10-year Treasury yield slipped to around 4.46% Thursday as investors treated the June employment report as a sign the economy is losing some labor-market momentum. Payrolls rose just 57,000, well below expectations, while April and May were revised down by a combined 74,000 jobs, undercutting the prior view that hiring had reaccelerated into summer. The unemployment rate fell to 4.2%, but that improvement was less comforting than it looked because the labor force participation rate dropped to 61.5%, suggesting the jobless rate was flattered by fewer people looking for work. The market reaction was classic “bad news is less hawkish Fed news.” Treasury yields had firmed recently on better growth sentiment and expectations the Fed could still tighten again, but the softer payroll print shifted attention back toward labor-market fragility. WSJ noted yields turned lower after the mixed report, with traders initially focused more on the weak jobs figure than the lower unemployment rate. The report does not eliminate the chance of another Fed rate hike, but it narrows the path. Wage growth of 3.5% from a year earlier is still firm enough to keep the Fed alert to inflation persistence, and the 34.3-hour workweek showed no major collapse in labor demand. But the composition of the report was softer: health care hiring slowed, leisure and hospitality lost 61,000 jobs and the labor-force drop raised questions about whether the economy is being supported by low layoffs rather than strong hiring. For the Fed, the report creates a more complicated July and September setup. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh used this week’s ECB forum to reinforce the central bank’s 2% inflation target and said policymakers would not tolerate a higher inflation objective, while also refusing to provide forward guidance on the next rate move. That stance means the Fed is not pivoting toward easing, but the payroll miss gives officials a stronger argument to wait for additional inflation and labor data before tightening again. Bottom line: the bond market is reading the jobs report as a modest relief signal, not a decisive all-clear. Softer payrolls reduce the urgency for a September hike, but the Fed remains constrained by still-elevated inflation and Warsh’s explicit price-stability message. That leaves the 10-year yield vulnerable to two-sided swings: weaker labor and growth data could pull yields lower, while any renewed inflation firmness or hawkish Fed rhetoric would quickly rebuild rate-hike expectations.—NWS case count rises, but Zavala shift marks first containment milestoneNew Crockett County sheep cases lift confirmed detections to 31, while the original Zavala County cluster moving inactive shows progress remains uneven across Texas The New World screwworm (NWS) outbreak entered July with another increase in confirmed cases, but also with the first clear sign that containment can work when surveillance, treatment, movement controls and sterile-fly pressure are brought to bear quickly. USDA’s APHIS dashboard now shows 31 confirmed U.S. animal cases, with two July 1 detections in sheep in Crockett County, Texas, pushing that county’s total to eight cases, the highest county-level count in the state. Of the 31 total detections, 10 are now inactive and 21 remain active. The important development is Zavala County. That was the original detection site, with APHIS confirming the first U.S. case in the current outbreak in a calf there on June 3. USDA said at the time it was forming a unified incident command with Texas, establishing a 20-kilometer infested zone, implementing quarantines and movement controls, increasing surveillance and accelerating sterile-fly releases. The fact that all three Zavala County cases have now shifted to inactive status indicates no additional animal-level mitigation is required on those cases. APHIS defines active cases as those involving ongoing disease mitigation until the animal is free of NWS myiasis, while inactive cases are those where mitigation is no longer required because the animal recovered or measures were taken to prevent spread. But the Zavala milestone should not be read as the outbreak easing. Crockett County is now the sharper concern. The two new sheep confirmations there bring the county’s active case total to eight, including seven sheep and one bovine, suggesting local transmission pressure remains a problem and that small ruminants are playing a prominent role in the county’s case pattern. That is important because sheep and goats can be harder to monitor across large, brushy, extensive grazing areas, raising the risk that wounds or infestations are not found as quickly as in more closely managed cattle operations. The policy implication is that officials are likely to keep tightening the operational net rather than relaxing it. The Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) says quarantine restrictions are in place for parts of multiple Texas counties, including Crockett, Zavala, Uvalde, Pecos, Terrell and others, and that warm-blooded animals in an infested zone may not move out without prior authorization. Animals moving out of a zone must be inspected, treated as required and accompanied by a movement certificate. A July 1 TAHC order covering Crockett, Pecos and Terrell counties says the restrictions are aimed at reducing spread to non-infested animals and preventing NWS from establishing in new areas. The broader read is mixed: containment appears possible, but not fast. Zavala’s shift to inactive is a meaningful proof point for the response strategy, especially because it was the index county. Crockett’s rising count, however, shows the outbreak is still moving through fresh pockets and that the response will remain county-by-county, premise-by-premise and animal-by-animal. Until active case counts begin falling in the newer clusters, the market and policy focus will stay on movement restrictions, sterile-fly deployment, producer compliance and how quickly officials can prevent isolated detections from becoming sustained local establishment. —Moroccan phosphate duty pause now formally in Federal RegisterPublication is largely procedural, but the move is a meaningful near-term fertilizer-cost relief valve for growers and a sign the White House is willing to override trade-remedy policy when input supplies threaten crop-production economics The Federal Register has now published Proclamation 11038, “Declaration of Emergency and Authorization for Temporary Duty-Free Importation of Phosphate Fertilizer From Morocco,” with a July 2 publication date, FR Document 2026-13588 and citation 91 FR 40855. The action was signed June 29 and filed July 1, so the Federal Register notice is essentially the legal publication step rather than a new policy decision. The proclamation authorizes Treasury and Commerce, after consultation with Homeland Security, to permit Moroccan phosphate fertilizer imports free from the collection of duties and estimated duty deposits for eight months from June 29 or until the emergency is terminated, whichever comes first. Link The key point is that this does not permanently revoke the underlying trade-remedy orders on Moroccan phosphate fertilizer. Instead, it temporarily suspends duty collection under emergency authority in Section 318(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, with the administration arguing that U.S. phosphate production is insufficient after accounting for exports and that farmers need predictable access to phosphate nutrients ahead of the fall-to-early-spring application window for 2027 crops. The market signal is more important than the publication itself. Farm groups have argued for years that the duties restricted a major alternative source of phosphate fertilizer and contributed to higher DAP and MAP costs. The countervailing duties have been as high as 16.8%, while a Texas A&M Agricultural and Food Policy Center study estimated the Moroccan phosphate duties raised costs for producers of major crops by roughly $6.9 billion over the 2021-2025 growing seasons. The move also fits the broader fertilizer-policy pivot underway at USDA. The administration has paired the Moroccan import-duty pause with USDA’s new $500 million FIELDS initiative to expand domestic fertilizer capacity (see related item under Fertilizer section below). That combination underscores the policy split: import relief is the short-term tool to ease price and supply risk, while domestic production funding is the longer-term answer to supply-chain vulnerability. The political and legal fight is not over. The International Trade Commission on June 17 said it will proceed with full five-year reviews of the countervailing duty orders on phosphate fertilizers from Morocco and Russia to determine whether revocation would likely lead to continued or recurring injury to U.S. industry. That means the proclamation buys time and potentially lowers near-term fertilizer costs, but it does not settle the larger dispute between growers seeking cheaper imports and domestic producers seeking protection from subsidized competition. —EPA opens door to new crop desiccation toolsRequest for Information (RFI) launches work toward a $30 million innovation challenge, but the practical test will be whether alternatives can match chemical desiccants’ speed, cost and reliability at harvest EPA has formally opened a request for information on creating an Innovation Challenge aimed at developing “practical, cost-effective alternatives” to conventional pesticide chemicals used for crop desiccation. The Federal Register notice says the effort is intended to reduce reliance on conventional chemical desiccants while maintaining harvest readiness, crop quality and operational efficiency, with public comments due Sept. 30 under docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2026-3862. The move is not a ban or immediate label restriction. It is a program-design step for a prize competition under the America Competes Act, with EPA seeking input on scope, eligibility, evaluation criteria, potential pilot or demonstration work, and how to structure up to $30 million in prize funding. EPA’s July 1 announcement framed the effort as a way to help farmers “grow healthy food with fewer chemicals,” tying the initiative to the Trump administration’s broader Make America Healthy Again agenda. The policy significance is that EPA is using an incentive-based approach rather than beginning with a regulatory crackdown. That is likely by design. Chemical desiccants remain important in small grains, pulses, oilseeds, cotton and potatoes because they help dry down crops, improve harvest uniformity and let growers move through narrow harvest windows more efficiently. EPA’s notice specifically says stakeholders are interested in reducing reliance on conventional desiccants because of concerns over residues, applicator exposure, regulatory variability and market preferences. The biggest question is whether viable alternatives can be more than niche solutions. Agronomic timing, mechanical dry-down, precision tools, biological products, plant breeding and postharvest conditioning may all help, but growers will judge them against the realities of weather, crop maturity, labor availability, equipment capacity and basis pressure at harvest. A lower-chemical option that adds cost, slows harvest or increases quality risk will be a tough sell unless the prize program helps prove field-scale performance across different regions and crops. For agriculture, this could become another front in the broader shift away from conventional pesticide dependence without directly removing tools from the toolbox. For registrants and input suppliers, the RFI is a signal that desiccation uses may face more scrutiny from regulators, food companies and export markets over time. For growers, the near-term task will be shaping EPA’s criteria so the challenge rewards workable farm-level solutions, not only concepts that look good in a grant proposal but fail during a compressed harvest window. —Colorado River crisis puts California’s water dominance under scrutinyLos Angeles Times reporting from the river’s headwaters shows a shrinking supply colliding with Southern California’s urban demand, Imperial Valley agriculture and a legal system built for a wetter era The Los Angeles Times’ latest reporting from the Rocky Mountain headwaters makes the Colorado River crisis feel less like a distant reservoir-management problem and more like a supply shock already visible at the source. Ian James and photographer Robert Gauthier found parched meadows, dried springs, weak tributaries and ranchers describing conditions as “terrifying,” a warning sign for a river that supports about 35 million people and 5 million acres of farmland across the Southwest, Southern California and northern Mexico. The most important California takeaway is that the state is not a peripheral user of the Colorado River; it is the biggest one. The Los Angeles Times notes that the river supplies nearly one-fourth of the water flowing from taps in Southern California cities, reaches the region through the 242-mile Colorado River Aqueduct, and is the only water source for the Imperial Valley and other Southern California farming areas. That makes any sustained decline in the river a direct risk to both urban water reliability and one of the nation’s most productive winter vegetable and forage regions. The crisis is worsening because the river’s long-term arithmetic no longer works. The Times reports that Lake Mead is now 28% full and Lake Powell 24% full, while the Colorado’s flow has averaged 21% less since 2000 than during the last century and about 32% less since 2020, according to federal data. That means the dispute is not just about temporary drought response; it is about adjusting to a smaller river that was overallocated under a 1922 compact written in a much wetter period. For California, the vulnerability is complicated by priority. Historically, California has had stronger legal claims than Arizona and Nevada in the Lower Basin, which helped shield it from earlier rounds of cutbacks. But that legal insulation is becoming harder to defend politically as reservoirs sink and Upper Basin states argue they are already absorbing shortages because less snowpack means less water reaches the system in the first place. The Los Angeles Times reports that the seven basin states remain deadlocked, with the Trump administration preparing its own plan that could impose larger mandatory cuts if the states cannot agree. Agriculture is where the math turns most difficult. Roughly three-fourths of the water diverted from the Colorado River is used for farming, and nearly half goes to alfalfa and other crops used to feed cattle, according to the Times. That does not mean agriculture can simply be blamed and cut indiscriminately; the Imperial Valley is economically dependent on irrigation, and fallowing land can ripple through farm labor, feed markets, food supply chains and rural tax bases. But it does mean any serious conservation plan will have to include agriculture, especially lower-value, high-water-use forage production. The policy debate is moving beyond temporary payments to idle hay fields. The Times notes that farmers in California and Arizona have accepted federal payments over the last three years to leave some fields dry part of the year, while some water experts are now calling for government purchases of farmland from willing sellers to permanently reduce demand. That would be politically explosive but increasingly plausible if the alternative is repeated emergency cuts, litigation and shrinking reservoirs that threaten hydropower and basic system operations. Bottom line: California’s Colorado River advantage is becoming a liability. The state uses more than any other, which means it has the most at stake and will face the most pressure to show measurable cuts. The Times’ reporting from Colorado’s headwaters underscores that this is not just a Lower Basin negotiation or a California farm-water fight. It is a basinwide reckoning with a river that is producing less water, even as cities, farms, tribes, wildlife and power systems continue to depend on promises made when the West believed the Colorado could deliver far more than it now can. |
| FINANCIAL MARKETS |
—Equities today: U.S. Dow opened around 300 points higher on Thursday as weaker-than-expected jobs data pushed back expectations that the Federal Reserve may tighten monetary policy. Contracts for the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and Dow rose by 0.5%, with the latter reaching a new record.
The main pressure point remains technology, especially semiconductors. Wednesday’s U.S. session already showed that the AI/chip trade is vulnerable after a massive second-quarter advance, with Reuters noting the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell 6.3% after a near-88% quarterly gain. That weakness carried into Asia, where South Korea’s KOSPI was hit hard as SK Hynix and Samsung sold off, reinforcing the view that investors are taking profits from one of the most crowded and successful trades of the year.
The labor data is the immediate macro trigger. The weaker U.S jobs report could provide relief to rate-sensitive growth stocks.
The holiday calendar also matters. With U.S. equity markets closed Friday, July 3, in observance of Independence Day, traders have less time to react and less incentive to add risk ahead of a long weekend. That can exaggerate the market’s sensitivity to the jobs print, especially in high-beta sectors like chips and AI-linked growth stocks. The near-term read is that futures are not flashing panic, but they are signaling that the market wants confirmation the labor market is not too hot for the Fed — and that the chip-stock selloff remains contained.
In Asia, Japan -2.5%. Hong Kong +0.8%. China -2%. India +0.8%.
In Europe, at midday, London +0.5%. Paris +0.8%. Frankfurt +0.9%.
—Equities yesterday:
| Equity Index | Closing Price July 1 | Point Difference from June 30 | % Difference from June 30 |
| Dow | 52,305.24 | -13.96 | -0.03% |
| Nasdaq | 26,040.03 | -173.69 | -0.66% |
| S&P 500 | 7,483.23 | -16.13 | -0.22% |
—General Mills turns to deeper cost cuts as sales recovery remains fragile
Fourth-quarter results offered some relief, but the company’s fiscal 2027 outlook shows management is still bracing for a cautious consumer and sluggish category growth
General Mills ended a difficult fiscal year with a better fourth quarter, but the larger message from the Golden Valley-based food maker was defensive: restoring sales growth will require heavier brand investment, sharper consumer value and a much leaner cost structure. The company said fourth-quarter net sales rose 1% to $4.6 billion, while organic net sales were flat, and adjusted earnings of 95 cents per share topped analyst expectations. But full-year net sales fell 5% to $18.4 billion, with organic net sales down 2%, underscoring how much pressure remains on packaged-food volumes after several years of inflation-driven price increases.
The company’s new $3 billion cost-savings target through fiscal 2030 is the clearest sign that General Mills does not expect a quick rebound in demand. Management says roughly $2 billion will come from its Holistic Margin Management productivity program, with another $1 billion from broader transformation efforts, including supply-chain redesign and streamlined business processes. At least $750 million of those savings are targeted for fiscal 2027 alone, giving the company room to offset input-cost inflation while funding more innovation, renovation and marketing.
The challenge is that cost cuts can protect margins, but they do not automatically fix weak demand. General Mills’ largest business, North America Retail, posted a 4% sales decline in the quarter and an 11% decline for the year, though part of that reflected divestitures. The company also recorded a $2.0 billion quarterly net loss tied largely to non-cash goodwill and brand intangible charges and a valuation loss related to the planned sale of its Brazil business, reinforcing that management is still reshaping the portfolio after a difficult year.
For food and ag markets, the read-through is that big packaged-food companies remain focused on protecting margins rather than chasing volume at any cost. General Mills is leaning into promotions, product renovation and consumer-facing value because shoppers remain selective, trading around brands and looking for deals. That keeps pressure on branded food companies to justify premium shelf prices, especially in center-store categories where private label and discount competition remain persistent.
The fiscal 2027 outlook was cautious rather than celebratory. General Mills expects organic net sales to range from down 1.5% to up 0.5%, with adjusted EPS of $3.00 to $3.20. That guidance suggests the fourth-quarter beat was a stabilizing moment, not yet a full turnaround. The company’s path from here depends on whether innovation around protein, fiber, bold flavors, indulgence and pet-food “humanization” can rebuild volume momentum while cost savings keep earnings from sliding further.
—Warsh eases inflation alarm, but not the Fed’s price-stability line
New Fed chair is signaling less urgency for a July rate rise, but he is also trying to establish that markets should not read softer inflation risks as tolerance for above-target inflation
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s remarks in Sintra, Portugal, marked an important early test of his communications style: less forward guidance, more emphasis on incoming data, and a continued insistence that the Fed will not accommodate inflation above its 2% goal. Speaking at the European Central Bank’s annual forum, Warsh said inflation expectations and inflation risks had eased in recent weeks, but he paired that observation with a clear warning that anyone expecting the Fed to tolerate inflation above target would be “disappointed.”
That combination matters because it gives markets a more nuanced Warsh signal. The easing in inflation risks, likely tied in part to retreating energy-price pressures after the Middle East-driven spike, reduces the immediate pressure for the Fed to raise rates at the July 28-29 FOMC meeting. But Warsh did not close the door on a move. His “good family fight” reference suggests the July debate will be active, with the committee weighing whether the inflation shock is fading fast enough or whether stronger growth, firm labor conditions and AI-related investment demand risk keeping inflation sticky.
The June 17 FOMC statement provides the backdrop. The Fed held the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, said economic activity was expanding at a solid pace and stated plainly that inflation remained elevated relative to the 2% goal, including from supply shocks in energy. The statement also included the blunt line that the committee “will deliver price stability,” but offered no meaningful forward guidance.
Warsh’s rejection of more explicit guidance is itself a policy message. He appears to be moving the Fed away from the post-crisis habit of carefully preparing markets for each step and toward a more data-dependent, less predictable approach. His argument is that markets already understand the Fed’s reaction function, as reflected in lower Treasury yields, reduced rate volatility and declining inflation expectations. That stance may give the Fed more optionality, but it also means each inflation, jobs and energy report will carry more market weight.
For the broader economy, the key read-through is that rate cuts remain hard to justify unless inflation cools more convincingly. A July rate hike is not clearly signaled, but neither is relief. Warsh’s early posture is hawkish in credibility terms even when he acknowledges better inflation news. For agriculture and commodity markets, that leaves a mixed setup: lower inflation risks and softer energy pressure can help input-cost psychology, but a Fed still focused on price stability keeps financing costs elevated and limits the odds of a weaker-dollar boost unless inflation data continue to improve.
| U.S. AG ECONOMY |
—Large banks pull back on farm operating credit even as ag lenders keep expanding
KC Fed data show no broad farm credit stress, but the first-quarter loan mix points to more selective lending as crop-sector margins remain under pressure
Farm loan growth remained solid in the first quarter of 2026, but the Kansas City Fed data (link) show a clear split in where that growth is occurring and what type of credit lenders are most willing to extend. Agricultural banks continued to expand both farm real estate and non-real estate lending at a steady pace, reinforcing that banks with deeper farm-sector specialization remain engaged. But non-real estate loans at non-agricultural banks declined for the first time since 2021, signaling a more cautious approach toward operating and production exposure among some larger, more diversified lenders.
The most important takeaway is not that farm credit is broadly contracting, but that lending appetites are shifting. Banks with farm loan portfolios above $1 billion reported a nearly 10% year-over-year decline in non-real estate loan balances, while their farm real estate lending rose nearly 10%. That contrast suggests large lenders remain comfortable with land-secured credit, where collateral values have stayed firm, but are pulling back from operating loans tied more directly to crop margins, input costs and repayment risk. The pullback was also narrow, concentrated among only a few large institutions rather than spread widely across the banking system.
Credit quality does not yet point to mounting farm financial stress. Delinquency rates were little changed from a year earlier and remained low overall, with roughly 2% of farm loans past due at the largest agricultural lenders and less than 1.5% across smaller cohorts. Charge-offs also remained limited, although large lenders continued to show somewhat weaker performance than smaller farm-focused banks. That matters because it helps explain why some larger institutions may be trimming exposure even before losses become severe.
The broader farm economy is still being supported by government payments, strong cattle revenues and stable farmland values, all of which have helped prevent a sharper deterioration in borrower balance sheets. But the KC Fed report underscores that the stress is uneven. Livestock-heavy borrowers and landowners remain in a stronger position, while crop producers facing tighter margins are likely seeing more scrutiny on operating lines. The result is a farm credit market that remains healthy on the surface, but increasingly selective underneath.
| AG MARKETS |
—Late reporting key component of market-year high beef export sales
USDA’s weekly Export Sales data covering the week ended June 25, contained a market-year high total for U.S. beef export sales for delivery in 2026. The total sales of 126,100 MT were a marketing-year high.
But they reflected a significant level of late-reported activity. Here’s how USDA breaks down the week’s export sales of beef: Chile (38,400 MT, including 38,500 MT – late), Italy (32,300 MT, including 32,200 MT – late), Japan (20,600 MT, including decreases of 400 MT and 18,600 MT – late), Hong Kong (11,800 MT, including decreases of 100 MT and 11,200 MT – late). The activity for the week also included late-reported exports for the destinations. For 2026, net sales and exports totaling 111,164 MT were reported late for Chile (38,452 MT), Italy (32,246 MT), Japan (18,583 MT), Hong Kong (11,226 MT), Switzerland (3,734 MT), Taiwan (2,342 MT), the United Kingdom (1,669 MT), the United Arab Emirates (1,438 MT), Singapore (1,126 MT), and Lebanon (348 MT).
—Why late reporting drove the beef export sales record — and why the headline overstates demand
A compliance catch-up, not a buying surge: the mechanics behind the 126,100-MT marketing-year high
The reporting framework. USDA’s weekly Export Sales report is not survey data — it is mandatory self-reporting by exporters under Section 602 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 and FAS regulations (7 CFR Part 20). Exporting firms must file sales and shipments with FAS on a weekly deadline. When a firm fails to report transactions in the week they occurred, the corrections are booked in the week they are finally filed and flagged as “late.” Critically, late entries inflate the current week’s net sales figure even though the underlying business may have been transacted weeks or months earlier. Knowing failure to report carries penalties under the Act, including fines and potential suspension of export privileges, which is why firms that discover gaps file large catch-up corrections rather than quietly ignoring them.
Why late reporting happens. The usual culprits are firm-level compliance breakdowns: personnel turnover in trade-compliance departments, ERP or reporting-system migrations, mergers that scramble reporting responsibility, misclassification of destinations, or a newer exporter simply unaware of ESR obligations. FAS also routinely reconciles ESR filings against Census Bureau customs data; when physical shipments show up in Census trade data with no matching ESR sales, compliance staff contact the firm and a backlog filing follows. The fingerprint of that scenario is exactly what this week’s report shows: a single week in which sales and exports across ten destinations — Chile, Italy, Japan, Hong Kong, Switzerland, Taiwan, the UK, the UAE, Singapore and Lebanon — arrive simultaneously as late entries totaling 111,164 MT. That pattern points to one exporter (or a very small number) clearing an accumulated backlog in one filing, not ten countries independently correcting records in the same week.
The tell in the destination data. The volumes themselves signal accumulated, not current, business. The 38,452 MT reported late for Chile and 32,246 MT for Italy are wildly out of scale with normal weekly — or even quarterly — U.S. beef flows to those markets. The Italy figure is particularly revealing: U.S. beef enters the EU almost entirely through the duty-free high-quality beef quota, under which the U.S.-specific allocation runs to roughly 35,000 MT annually under the 2019 U.S./EU agreement. A one-week sale to Italy approaching that entire annual allocation is implausible as fresh business; it is consistent with many months of unreported transactions being filed at once. Note also the internal arithmetic — Chile’s weekly total of 38,400 MT is actually smaller than its 38,500-MT late component, meaning current-week activity to Chile was a slight net negative.
Market implications. Strip out the late-reported sales components and genuinely new net sales for the week were modest — on the order of 15,000-25,000 MT, a routine week rather than a record. Traders and analysts routinely discount late-flagged totals, so the futures market reaction to the “marketing-year high” should be, and typically is, muted. Equally important: much of the late-reported tonnage represents exports as well as sales, meaning a substantial share of this product has already shipped. It is accounting catch-up, not new outstanding demand on the books. And because USDA’s WASDE beef export forecast is benchmarked to Census trade data — which captured these shipments when they physically moved — the late filings should have little to no effect on USDA’s official export outlook. The main statistical effect is that ESR accumulated-export and outstanding-sales tallies now realign with the customs data they had quietly fallen behind.
Bottom line. The record is real in an accounting sense but hollow as a demand signal. The week’s report is best read as one exporter’s compliance cleanup — likely triggered by FAS reconciliation against customs data — that concentrated months of routine business into a single headline number.
One caveat: USDA has not (as of this morning) published an explanatory notice identifying the cause of this specific late-filing episode, so attribution to a single-exporter backlog is analytical inference from the data pattern, not confirmed by FAS.
—U.S. ag export sales to China marked by sorghum, old-crop soybean, beef and pork business. USDA weekly Export Sales data for the week ended June 25 included activity for China for 2025/26 of net sales of 82,858 MT of sorghum (37,086 MT of new sales), net sales of 65,389 MT of soybeans, and net sales of 5,518 running bales of upland cotton (5,720 running bales of new sales). For 2026, net sales of 1,794 MT of beef (1,808 MT of new sales) and 5,275 MT of pork (5,403 new sales). There were no 2026/27 sales reported for soybeans.
—Grains firm overnight as soy complex leads modest follow-through buying
Corn and wheat added small gains, but the stronger soybean-meal-led advance in beans gave the overnight tone a firmer demand-sensitive bias
Grain futures were firmer overnight, with soybeans again providing the clearest leadership. September corn rose 1 1/4 cents to $4.24, while August soybeans climbed 7 3/4 cents to $11.41. August soybean meal gained $2.90 to $308.20 and August soyoil added 27 points to 66.96 cents. Wheat followed with modest strength, as September SRW rose 2 1/4 cents to $6.02 1/4 and September HRW gained 2 1/4 cents to $6.37 1/4. Public quote screens also showed corn, soybeans and wheat trading higher early July 2, broadly matching the firmer overnight tone.
The price action points to continued corrective buying after recent market pressure, but not yet a decisive shift in trend. Soybeans carried the most constructive signal, with meal strength suggesting end-user demand and product-spread support are helping pull beans higher. Corn’s gain was modest but important because it kept futures moving in the same direction as beans, limiting the risk of renewed chart weakness. Wheat’s small advance was more of a follow-through move than a fresh bullish breakout, as harvest pressure and global export competition continue to cap rallies.
Overall, the overnight trade was supportive but still measured, with traders likely waiting for clearer signals from weather, demand and outside markets before extending the move more aggressively.
—International grain prices mixed as Black Sea wheat pressure builds
Paris wheat holds steady, corn firms, palm oil retreats, while softer Russian FOB wheat keeps export competition front and center
International grain and vegoil markets were mixed on July 2, with Paris wheat steady, Paris corn firmer, Malaysian palm oil lower and Russian wheat values easing as the trade positions for a large southwestern Russian harvest. The price action points to a market still balancing localized European firmness against the weight of cheaper Black Sea wheat supplies.
Paris September wheat futures were steady at €203.00/MT, equal to about $231.18/MT, or roughly $6.29 per bushel using a EUR/USD rate near 1.1388. Paris wheat’s flat tone suggests the market is not yet willing to build much weather or supply premium, especially with Russian export values weakening.
Paris August corn futures rose €1.00/MT to €235.25/MT, equal to about $267.86/MT, or roughly $6.80 per bushel. The stronger corn tone relative to wheat signals a firmer European feed grain market, though that quote remains a futures-market equivalent rather than a direct landed U.S. value.
Malaysian August palm oil futures fell 50 ringgits to 4,478 RM/MT. Using Malaysia’s July 2 USD/MYR reference near 4.0850, that equals about $1,096/MT, or roughly 49.7 cents per pound. Palm oil’s pullback is notable because vegoil markets have been trying to price stronger biofuel demand, but the day’s weakness suggests profit-taking and softer outside-market influence are still limiting follow-through.
Russian July FOB wheat was offered at $229/MT, equal to about $6.23 per bushel, while August was bid at $227/MT, or about $6.18 per bushel. The $2/MT August slippage is the most important signal in the wheat complex because it reflects harvest pressure from southern and western Russia. If Russian export offers continue to ease, they will remain a ceiling over Paris wheat and a competitive challenge for U.S. wheat into price-sensitive import tenders.
Bottom line: Global grain values are not moving in one direction. European corn is firmer, wheat is steady, palm oil is lower and Russian wheat is softening. For U.S. markets, the Russian wheat signal matters most: cheaper Black Sea offers can restrain export hopes and limit rallies unless weather problems or demand surprises emerge elsewhere.
—Record May crush extends soy demand strength
USDA data show U.S. processors continue to run hard, with soybean crush and corn-for-ethanol use both setting May records despite softer meal disappearance
USDA’s latest monthly oilseed crushings report reinforced the strength of domestic soybean demand, with the May U.S. soybean crush reaching 213.1 million bushels, a record for the month and the 15th consecutive month in which crush has set a same-month high. The sustained string of records underscores how much structural demand has been added through expanded crush capacity, renewable diesel feedstock demand and still-solid domestic processing margins.
The report is supportive for soybeans because it shows processors continue to absorb large volumes even as export demand remains uneven and meal use softened. The weaker meal component is worth watching, as it suggests livestock-feed demand or export movement may not be keeping pace with the crush expansion. But for now, oil demand appears to be the larger driver of processor economics, especially with soybean oil inventories tightening.
USDA reported soybean oil stocks at 2.315 billion pounds — not bushels — the lowest level in six months. That drawdown is notable because it shows heavy crush has not translated into burdensome oil supplies. Renewable diesel and broader biofuel demand remain central to the soyoil balance sheet, and tighter stocks could help keep oil share elevated in crush margins if policy support and blending economics remain favorable.
Corn demand also posted a strong showing. Corn used for ethanol totaled 471.8 million bushels in May, a record for the month and the largest monthly use since December 2025. That confirms ethanol plants remain aggressive users of corn, supported by strong margins and resilient fuel-blending demand. For the corn market, the data add another reminder that domestic industrial use is not backing off even as the trade focuses heavily on crop size, export prospects and weather risk.
Upshot: U.S. row-crop demand remains firmer than headline export uncertainty alone might suggest. Record soybean crush and record May ethanol use point to strong domestic disappearance, which could become increasingly important if 2026 crop uncertainty tightens balance sheets. The bearish caveat is that meal use remains a soft spot, and expanded crush capacity means processors must keep finding homes for both oil and meal. But the latest USDA data lean supportive overall, especially for soybean oil and corn demand.
—Ag market recap for Wed., July 1: grains extend post-USDA rally while livestock futures fade
July 1 trade showed renewed risk premium in corn and wheat, a steadier soybean uptrend, firming cotton charts and profit-taking in livestock after recent strength
Ag futures leaned firmer on July 1, led by grains as traders continued to absorb USDA’s June 30 acreage and stocks data and then layered in technical buying. Corn contracts closed 3 to 8 1/4 cents higher Wednesday, wheat was higher across all three exchanges and soybeans posted gains across most contracts. The day’s action was not a broad runaway rally, but it did show that sellers are having trouble pressing futures lower after the post-report shakeout.
Corn’s performance was the clearest technical improvement. September corn rose 6 cents to $4.22 3/4, while December gained 6 1/4 cents to $4.42 1/4. The more important development was the close above the 10-day moving average, which analyst say gives the market a better chance of extending the bounce if weather threats, export demand or fund short-covering continue to surface. USDA estimated 2026 U.S. corn planted area at 95.3 million acres, down 3% from last year, while June 1 corn stocks were 5.29 billion bushels, up 14% from a year earlier. That means the corn market is not trading an outright shortage story, but the rally suggests the trade sees enough demand and summer-weather uncertainty to discourage fresh selling at current levels.
Soybeans were mixed but still constructive. November soybeans rose 5 1/2 cents to $11.49 1/4, with the close near mid-range preserving the modest uptrend. September meal gained $1.60 to $303.50 after bouncing from support, while September soyoil slipped 13 points to 66.31 cents despite finishing nearer the daily high after touching a nine-week low. USDA put 2026 soybean planted area at 85.4 million acres, up 5% from last year, with harvested area at 84.4 million acres. That larger acreage base limits the bullish argument, but the soybean market is still finding enough support from meal stability, weather risk and the possibility of renewed demand interest to avoid a deeper correction. Soyoil remains the weak leg and will need help from vegetable oil, renewable fuel or crude-related sentiment to stop dragging on the complex.
Wheat again carried the strongest fundamental story. September SRW rose 10 3/4 cents to $6.00, September HRW gained 9 3/4 cents to $6.35 and September spring wheat climbed 12 cents to $6.18 1/2. USDA estimated all wheat planted area at 42.7 million acres, down 6% from last year, with winter wheat down 5%, other spring wheat down 6% and durum down 16%. Statistics Canada added to the supportive tone by reporting Canadian wheat area fell 5.9% to 25.3 million acres, led by declines in spring wheat, durum and winter wheat. The acreage reductions are especially important because they come on top of poor southern Plains yield results, tightening the margin for error in both U.S. and North American wheat balance sheets. The September SRW close at $6.00 also gives the market a psychological foothold after the recent recovery.
Cotton extended its chart recovery. December futures rose 104 points to 77.84 cents, near mid-range, as technical buying remained active. Some analysts say cotton futures were in “rally mode” late Wednesday, with front-month contracts up 104 to 106 points, even as crude oil was lower and the dollar was firmer. That is notable because cotton often struggles when outside-market signals are mixed. The move suggests traders are responding more to improving chart structure and broader risk appetite than to fresh fundamental demand news. USDA’s acreage report showed all cotton planted area at 9.85 million acres, 6% above 2025, so the market still needs export demand confirmation to turn the fledgling uptrend into something more durable.
Livestock futures were less supportive. August live cattle slipped 60 cents to $241.825, while August feeders fell 45 cents to $364.15. Live cattle were mixed, with August lower while other contracts posted small gains, and said feeder cattle were down slightly to 45 cents across most contracts. Analysts note that suggests the cattle market remains technically resilient but vulnerable to corrective pressure after its large premium structure. Feeders’ fourth straight lower close shows buyers are becoming more selective, though selling pressure remains contained by underlying support and still-tight cattle supplies.
Lean hogs reversed lower after early strength. August futures fell $1.15 to $97.05, finishing nearer the daily low after touching a three-week high. Lean hog futures pulled back Wednesday, with contracts down 5 cents to $1.15 at the close. The setback looked more like profit-taking than a full trend change, but it shows the market is sensitive to premiums over cash. Unless cash hogs and pork values provide follow-through support, rallies may continue to attract selling.
The overall message from July 1 was that grain traders are willing to rebuild weather and acreage risk premium, especially in wheat and corn, while soybeans remain steady but divided by product-market divergence. Cotton’s improving chart posture added to the firmer ag tone, but livestock futures showed a different mood as traders used strength to reduce risk ahead of the holiday-shortened week.
| Commodity | Contract Month | July 1 Close | Change from June 30 |
| Corn | September | $4.22 3/4 | +6 cents |
| Corn | December | $4.42 1/4 | +6 1/4 cents |
| Soybeans | November | $11.49 1/4 | +5 1/2 cents |
| Soybean meal | September | $303.50 | +$1.60 |
| Soybean oil | September | 66.31 cents | -13 points |
| SRW wheat | September | $6.00 | +10 3/4 cents |
| HRW wheat | September | $6.35 | +9 3/4 cents |
| Spring wheat | September | $6.18 1/2 | +12 cents |
| Cotton | December | 77.84 cents | +104 points |
| Live cattle | August | $241.825 | -60 cents |
| Feeder cattle | August | $364.15 | -45 cents |
| Lean hogs | August | $97.05 | -$1.15 |
| FERTILIZER |
—USDA fertilizer push shifts focus from grant promises to real production
New $500 million FIELDS program is designed to favor shovel-ready fertilizer projects, but its market impact will depend on how quickly plants can be financed, permitted and built
USDA’s new $500 million Fertilizer Investment & Expansion for Long-Term Domestic Supply (FIELDS) Program marks the administration’s clearest attempt yet to turn fertilizer policy from a resilience talking point into a production-capacity effort. Using Commodity Credit Corporation authority, USDA will route the funding through Rural Development’s Rural Business-Cooperative Service, with the goal of expanding or bringing online independent domestic fertilizer capacity for nitrogen, phosphate, potash, sulfur and other key crop nutrients. USDA’s program page says the effort is aimed at new or expanded manufacturing capacity, facility upgrades, shovel-ready projects, and logistics investments that improve fertilizer distribution and storage.
The policy signal is important because fertilizer has moved from being treated mainly as a farm input cost issue to being framed as a supply-chain and national security vulnerability. That is especially true after recent global disruptions pushed fertilizer prices higher and reinforced how exposed U.S. producers remain to foreign sources, energy markets, shipping chokepoints and trade remedies. Reuters reported the announcement followed a fertilizer price spike tied to the Iran war and a near closure of the Strait of Hormuz, with Rollins saying USDA wants fertilizer plants “built in America.”
The key distinction from the Biden-era Fertilizer Production Expansion Program is USDA’s emphasis on execution. Rollins is drawing a sharp contrast between the prior program’s broader climate and innovation focus and FIELDS’ stated priority of project readiness, financial strength, construction timelines and measurable production outcomes. That is politically useful, but it is also economically relevant: farmers will not see relief from announced capacity unless projects can secure matching capital, navigate permitting, lock in feedstocks and reach commercial operation. USDA’s Rural Development page lists at least $500 million available, with a maximum award of $100 million, and limits eligibility to domestically owned applicants that are not already among the largest market-share holders in the covered nutrient markets.
The near-term price impact is likely to be limited. Fertilizer plants are capital-intensive, exposed to construction delays and heavily dependent on energy and mineral input economics. Nitrogen capacity hinges on natural gas availability and cost; phosphate depends on rock supply, processing and environmental compliance; potash expansion is even more geologically constrained. Rollins’ acknowledgment that these projects will not all be finished in a year is realistic. The bigger potential benefit is not immediate price relief but a gradual widening of supply options, especially if USDA funds projects that are already far enough along to reach the market before the next major fertilizer price cycle.
For producers, the program should be viewed as part of a broader input-cost strategy rather than a stand-alone fix. It comes alongside the administration’s recent action on phosphate fertilizer duties and continued concern about fertilizer market concentration. If FIELDS succeeds, it could modestly increase competition, reduce dependence on politically unstable supply lines and create more regional options for farmers. If it struggles, it risks becoming another case where federal dollars were announced faster than physical capacity could be delivered.
Bottom line: FIELDS is a more production-focused fertilizer initiative than prior USDA efforts, and its design correctly emphasizes shovel-ready projects and measurable output. But the program’s success will be judged by tons of fertilizer produced, not dollars obligated. For farmers facing tight margins, the payoff will only come if USDA can convert the $500 million into timely domestic capacity that changes availability and pricing at the farm level.
| ENERGY MARKETS & POLICY |
—Crude breaks lower as Hormuz risk premium evaporates
Market is shifting from war-scarcity pricing to short-term surplus pricing, but depleted U.S. inventories leave little cushion if diplomacy falters
WTI Crude’s roughly 2% drop to near $67 per barrel reflects a sharp reassessment of supply risk.
The dominant market signal is no longer fear that the Strait of Hormuz will choke off Gulf exports, but evidence that barrels are moving again.
Brent is nearly $71 per barrel oil fell for a third straight session, with pressure tied to easing disruption concerns after Qatar said U.S.-Iran talks made progress on Hormuz-related issues.
The supply side has turned decisively bearish in the near term. UAE export recovery, Saudi ad hoc sales to Asia and emergency stock releases are combining to create a mini glut just as the geopolitical risk premium is being stripped out of prices. Reuters also reported that supertankers carrying 10 million barrels of Saudi crude had exited the strait, while UBS cut its oil-price forecasts as Hormuz flows recovered and noted that faster normalization and strong UAE supply growth could pull Brent closer to $70.
Still, the decline should not be read as a clean demand-side bearish signal, analysts note. U.S. inventories remain tight: EIA data showed commercial crude stocks fell 3.8 million barrels to 408.4 million barrels, about 7% below the five-year average, while gasoline stocks also declined ahead of the July 4 demand period. That means the market has downside pressure from returning Middle East flows but limited protection if the diplomatic track stalls, if Iran presses its demand for greater maritime control, or if U.S.Iran nuclear tensions flare again.
The key takeaway is that crude is now pricing restored transit more aggressively than durable peace. If Hormuz flows expand and strategic releases continue, sellers have the upper hand. But once reserve releases fade, the market may refocus on low inventories, still-fragile diplomacy and the fact that Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical oil chokepoints, with the IEA noting that around one-quarter of global seaborne oil trade moved through the strait in 2025.
—45Z feedstock rule is a step, not the finish line
USDA’s final rule gives farmers a way to document lower-carbon crops, but it does not itself guarantee a 45Z premium or complete the federal implementation chain
A general farm media statementis not correct because it treats USDA’s final biofuel feedstock rule and updated Feedstock Carbon Intensity Calculator as the “last piece of the puzzle” for farmer premiums. They are not. They are an important technical accounting framework for measuring and verifying reduced-carbon-intensity feedstocks, but they are not the 45Z tax-credit rule itself.
USDA says the final rule establishes guidelines for quantifying, reporting and verifying carbon intensity for regenerative biofuel feedstocks, and the USDA FD-CIC covers field corn, soybeans, sorghum and spring canola using specified practices such as no-till, reduced till, cover crops and certain nutrient-management practices. That is a major step toward monetizing lower-CI grain, but it does not by itself create a farmer payment mechanism.
The key point is that farmers are not the direct 45Z claimant. IRS says the Clean Fuel Production Credit is for clean transportation fuel produced domestically and sold during the credit window, and that a taxpayer cannot claim the credit unless the taxpayer is registered as a clean fuel producer at the time of production. In other words, the credit flows first to the ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel or SAF producer, not to the grower. Any farm-level premium would be a negotiated commercial pass-through from the biofuel producer, crusher, elevator or aggregator.
Nor is USDA’s action the last federal step. Treasury and IRS have issued proposed 45Z regulations covering credit eligibility, emissions rates, certification and registration requirements, while DOE says 45ZCF-GREET is the model Treasury adopted to determine emissions rates under 45Z. Clean Fuels Alliance America notes that Treasury intends to enable use of the USDA calculator, but DOE and Argonne still must incorporate it into 45ZCF-GREET and Treasury must issue guidance allowing taxpayers to claim enhanced 45Z credits based on those values.
That matters because the market plumbing is still complicated. USDA’s rule relies on mass-balance traceability, not a broader book-and-claim system, meaning reduced-CI crops and their data must move through the physical biofuel supply chain. USDA also requires records, third-party verification, attestations and chain-of-custody documentation, including safeguards against double counting. Those requirements may support future premiums, but they also create compliance costs, audit risk and logistical constraints that will determine whether farmers see added basis or contract premiums.
Here is a more accurate formulation: USDA has supplied one of the most important remaining technical pieces for valuing lower-CI feedstocks under 45Z, but farmer premiums still depend on Treasury/IRS guidance, DOE/Argonne model integration, biofuel producer tax-credit claims, verification systems and commercial contracts that pass some of the value back to growers.
—Ethanol strength becomes a corn market wild card
Crude’s retreat has not pulled ethanol lower, signaling that tight plant capacity, strong margins and possible E15 demand growth could sharpen competition for 2026/27 corn supplies
The U.S. ethanol market is sending a notably different signal than crude oil.
Higher crude and gasoline values helped lift ethanol in March and April, but the subsequent break in crude has not been mirrored in the cash ethanol market. Spot Midwest swap ethanol is quoted near $1.87 per gallon this week, barely changed from $1.88 last week and well above the $1.65 level seen in early July 2025. That resilience suggests ethanol is being priced less as a simple petroleum substitute and more as a physically tight, margin-supported product tied directly to corn grind capacity.
The capacity issue is central. EIA data show U.S. fuel ethanol production at 1.117 million barrels per day for the week ended June 26, with Midwest output at 1.053 million barrels per day, underscoring how heavily the industry is already relying on the core Corn Belt production base. Growth Energy’s prior weekly reading also showed Midwest ethanol capacity utilization near 94%, with additional installed capacity still idled outside normal maintenance, reinforcing the view that the market is not awash in unused processing room.
That makes margins more important than crude. Reports note that Iowa ethanol plant revenue is roughly 30 cents per gallon above all costs. That is exceptionally strong. Using the standard dry-mill conversion of about 2.8 gallons of ethanol per bushel of corn, that margin equates to roughly 84 cents per bushel of bidding cushion before plants are forced back toward breakeven, excluding changes in DDGS, corn oil or natural gas values. CARD’s margin framework also highlights why co-products matter, since ethanol returns are shaped by ethanol, DDGS and corn oil revenue against corn, natural gas and operating costs.
The practical implication is that ethanol plants can remain aggressive corn bidders longer than many end users would prefer. If margins do not become stressed until cash corn rises above $5.00 per bushel, ethanol demand can provide a firmer floor under basis and flat price during any yield scare or export-demand revival. That matters because the market is moving into a period when U.S. crop size will be largely determined, and domestic users may have to compete more directly with importers, including China, for a smaller 2026/27 supply base.
The policy angle adds another layer. EPA issued a temporary emergency waiver earlier this year to allow nationwide E15 sales for the summer driving season, but a permanent year-round E15 fix still requires Congress. The White House asked Congress to pass legislation codifying year-round E15, though Senate passage remains uncertain. If Congress can deliver a durable E15 pathway by September, the ethanol story shifts from defensive margin strength to genuine demand growth. In that case, 2026/27 corn grind near 5.7 billion bushels becomes a credible target rather than an aspirational number.
The takeaway is that ethanol is becoming one of the more important bullish variables in corn. Crude weakness has not broken ethanol values, margins remain unusually strong, and plant capacity is tight enough to keep processors disciplined but still aggressive. Unless gasoline demand weakens sharply or policy momentum on E15 fades, ethanol could remain a stubborn source of corn demand at the same time exporters and feed users are trying to secure coverage.
| WEATHER |
—Corn Belt forecast turns drier, tempering flood risk but raising mid-July crop questions
Near-term storms keep flash-flood threats active in the northwestern Corn Belt, while a sharply drier 11–15-day outlook could shift market attention from excess moisture to crop stress if the pattern persists
Thunderstorm complexes will continue to drive daily rainfall chances across the northwestern Corn Belt through Saturday, with localized 1- to 2-inch totals keeping flash-flood risks in place. That remains a near-term fieldwork and crop-management concern, especially in areas already dealing with repeated rounds of heavy rain. Farther southeast, saturated fields are getting a brief but important dry window through early Friday before scattered showers return later Friday and become more widespread into the weekend.
For crop conditions, the immediate pattern is mixed. Drier weather in the southeastern Corn Belt is welcome because it allows soils to drain and may help reduce disease pressure tied to excessive moisture. However, repeated storms in the northwest could continue to limit fieldwork, promote ponding in poorly drained areas and keep localized crop stress elevated. The July 5-8 period now looks like the coolest part of the forecast, which should ease stress from recent exceptional overnight warmth, including record-level lows near the Great Lakes.
The larger market signal is the much drier adjustment in the 11–15-day outlook. Strong model agreement now points to below-normal precipitation across much of the region as the pattern shifts into northwest flow aloft. That does not eliminate storm chances, since ridge-rider systems can still produce highly variable rainfall, but it reduces confidence in a broad, soaking pattern. For grain markets, that means the weather conversation could begin shifting away from too much rain and toward whether a drier mid-July pattern threatens pollination conditions, especially if warmth rebuilds later in the month.
Temperature guidance remains highly volatile, which limits confidence in the longer-range market takeaway. The European model has reversed sharply from its previous heat-dome signal and now shows a deeper trough during the middle of the 11–15-day period, while the overnight GFS ridge solution is being discounted as unsupported.
The practical conclusion is that precipitation risk has trended meaningfully drier, but the heat risk remains unsettled. For corn and soybean traders, that keeps weather premium sensitive to each model run, with the market likely to react quickly if the drier pattern begins to pair with renewed heat during the key reproductive window.
—Super El Niño Adds Another Layer of Weather Risk for Agriculture
Heat and thunderstorm clusters are the immediate concern, while a potentially very strong El Niño raises the odds of a more volatile fall and winter rainfall pattern
U.S. agriculture is moving into July with weather risk already elevated. The near-term concern is not simply the developing “Super El Niño” narrative, but the more immediate combination of dangerous heat, high humidity and recurring thunderstorm complexes. The National Weather Service is flagging dangerous, record-breaking heat across much of the central and eastern U.S., with heat indices likely above 100 degrees, while severe storms are forecast across parts of the Upper Midwest, Great Lakes, Northeast and central High Plains. That setup keeps flash flooding, hail, wind damage and livestock heat stress near the top of the ag-risk list.
NOAA’s latest ENSO discussion confirms El Niño conditions are in place and expected to strengthen into the Northern Hemisphere winter of 2026-27. The agency says there is a 63% chance of a “very strong” El Niño during November-January, one that would rank among the largest events in the historical record going back to 1950. That is the foundation for the “Super El Niño” shorthand being used in markets, though NOAA also cautions that even very strong events do not guarantee textbook impacts everywhere.
For crops, the immediate market issue is rainfall intensity and field-level timing. The Weather Prediction Center defines excessive rainfall risk around the probability that rain exceeds flash-flood guidance within about 25 miles of a point, which is exactly the kind of localized threat that can produce very uneven crop outcomes. A fast-moving storm complex can be a net positive for a dry field and a damaging event for a low-lying or already saturated field only a county away. Ponding in corn and soybeans, nitrogen leaching, delayed spraying, drowned-out spots, hay-quality losses and localized wind or hail damage can all develop even when the broader crop rating stays relatively stable.
The broader pattern argues for volatility rather than a single national crop-weather conclusion. Drought.gov’s near-term outlook for June 30-July 4 calls for hotter-than-normal weather from the Plains to the Atlantic Coast, with near- or above-normal rainfall across much of the country, while portions of the West, Southeast and Intermountain West stay comparatively drier. That split keeps both sides of the weather ledger active: flash-flood risk where storm clusters repeat, rapid crop stress where heat persists without timely rainfall, and fire-weather concerns in drier western areas.
El Niño’s more classic U.S. signal is likely to matter more later in the season and into winter. NOAA says El Niño shifts the Pacific jet stream south; during winter, that typically favors wetter conditions across the southern U.S. and warmer, drier conditions in the North, with increased flooding risk in the Gulf Coast and Southeast. For agriculture, that means the developing event could eventually reshape winter wheat moisture, Delta and Southeast fieldwork, river logistics, spring planting risk and global crop competition. But for now, the U.S. crop trade is likely to remain fixated on weekly rainfall placement, overnight temperatures, and whether heavy storm tracks repeatedly hit the same acreage.
The market takeaway is that “Super El Niño” is a risk multiplier, not a forecast by itself. Corn and soybean futures will respond less to the label and more to evidence of actual stress: standing water in key production areas, yield-limiting heat during reproductive stages, disease pressure after repeated rains, or improving soil moisture where crops had been dry. Until the weather pattern either stabilizes or becomes more damaging, the premium tied to El Niño will be more about uncertainty than confirmed crop loss.
