POLICY · NEWS · MARKETS

UPDATES: Policy/News/Markets

MONDAY, JULY 20, 2026

Weather Rally Rolls On: Beans Surge 19 Cents, Corn Firms as Heat Grips Northern Plains

USDA flash sale shows continued China purchases of U.S. soybeans

Link: SPECIAL REPORTS: Index by Key Topic
Link: House Poised to Vote on Dec. 4 Stopgap as GOP Tests 
         Narrow Majority
Link: USDA’s First 2027 Food Inflation Forecast Puts Beef and 
          Eggs in Focus
Link: Greer Rebuilds Trump’s Tariff Wall Before the Clock Runs Out
Link: Ag Commodity Markets: Bullish vs. Bearish Factors

Link: Locked Out: Fort Morgan Stares Down Life Without
          Its Economic Engine 

Link: Video: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, July 19
          Video show is now on You Tube,  Spotify & Apple
Link: Audio: Wiesemeyer’s Perspectives, July 19

Gasoline climbs back above $4 as Middle East risk reignites

Hormuz disruptions, lean inventories and refinery outages revive inflation pressure

The U.S. national average for regular gasoline moved back above $4 per gallon on Monday, reaching $4.003, according to AAA data cited by Reuters. Renewed U.S./Iran hostilities and disrupted traffic through the Strait of Hormuz are the main drivers, but below-normal inventories and refinery constraints are magnifying the increase.

Why Gasoline Is Rising Again

Crude oil has repriced the conflict risk. Renewed attacks between the U.S. and Iran have again restricted or threatened Hormuz traffic, which carried about 20% of global oil supplies before the war. Brent rose to about $90.95 per barrel Monday and U.S. crude to about $84.04, according to the Associated Press.

Inventories are lean. U.S. gasoline stockpiles were 210.5 million barrels, about 1.5 million below the five-year average, Reuters reported. EIA data also showed crude inventories at 409.7 million barrels, about 6% below normal. Low stocks leave less capacity to absorb an outage or delayed cargo.

Refining and seasonal pressures are reinforcing the move. Ukraine attacks have reduced Russian refining output, while recent U.S. refinery outages tightened regional supplies. Strong exports, summer driving demand and higher-cost summer-grade fuel are also limiting how quickly pump prices can retreat.

Inflation, consumers and agriculture

The gasoline rebound threatens to reverse part of the energy-driven improvement in June inflation data. The direct impact will appear in motor-fuel prices, but higher energy costs can also move through freight, delivery, air travel and goods prices. Because gasoline is so visible, the effect on inflation expectations and consumer confidence can exceed its mechanical weight in an inflation index.

For households, $4 gasoline acts like a regressive tax. Families with tighter budgets devote a larger share of income to transportation and may cut restaurant spending, retail purchases or discretionary travel. The increase also creates a political problem ahead of the November midterm elections because voters encounter the price every time they fill up.

Agriculture’s more direct concern is diesel. AAA’s national diesel average reached $5.108 per gallon Monday, up 23.3 cents in a week and $1.381, or 37.1%, from a year ago. That raises costs for trucking, irrigation, harvest preparation, crop movement and food distribution. A sustained crude rally also increases petrochemical and packaging costs, while higher household fuel bills can weaken demand for higher-priced food products.

What to Watch Next

Hormuz traffic and insurance conditions. A durable reopening or clear de-escalation would be the fastest route to lower crude and gasoline prices. Continued attacks, shipping delays or higher insurance premiums would keep a risk premium embedded in fuel.

Crude, inventories and refineries. If Brent holds near or above $90, retail gasoline is likely to retain an upward bias because pump prices lag wholesale moves. Another large inventory draw or refinery outage would increase the risk of prices moving deeper into the low-$4 range.

The duration of the shock. A brief flare-up would probably create a temporary spike. A prolonged restriction of Hormuz traffic could return gasoline toward the $4.50-plus levels seen in May. Testing the 2022 record would require a deeper and more sustained supply disruption.

Packer payback? Some in cattle country read a message in the market break

With the Big Four bleeding record red ink and USDA steering $500 million to their regional rivals, an $18 slide in cash cattle has feeders asking whether it’s margin math — or a message

The cash cattle market just took its hardest two-week hit in memory — roughly $18, with Kansas and Texas trade sliding to $237–$238 per cwt. last week and August live cattle futures falling to a four-month low. The textbook explanation is margin math. But in cattle country, another theory is making the rounds. As one veteran cattle feeder and futures trader put it to us:

The background: On June 30, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins unveiled the Strengthening Processing for U.S. Ranchers (SPUR) program — up to $500 million in payments to independent and regional beef processors squeezed by record cattle costs and a 75-year-low herd. The eligibility rules all but name the target: no packer with a “nationally dominant” market share qualifies, a line drawn to exclude Tyson, JBS, Cargill and National Beef, which together control roughly 85% of fed-cattle slaughter. Rollins has called the foreign-owned share of that capacity “unsustainable.” For the majors, watching Washington cut checks to their competitors while they absorb losses of $200–$300 per head — record red ink stretching back roughly six months — surely stings.

Perspective: You don’t need a conspiracy to explain the break. Packers losing that kind of money always do what they’re doing now — cutting slaughter 2% to 4% below year-ago, idling capacity (Cargill’s Fort Morgan plant has sat dark since spring), leaning on formula supplies and bidding cash down. And leverage genuinely shifted: after two years of feeders stretching feeding periods and carrying cattle to heavier weights, the wall of heavyweight cattle finally had to move, handing buyers the whip hand. Market analysts have been blunt that packers are “trying to break the market” — because that is what negative margins demand, SPUR or no SPUR.

Still, the feeder’s needle has a point. SPUR hands regional packers relief payments, not slaughter capacity — a regional processor cushioned by a government check still cannot put a competitive bid under fed cattle at scale. When the majors step back, no one steps in. That is the paradox at the heart of the packer-concentration debate: the same 85% market share Washington treats as the problem is also the only thing putting a bid under cattle every week.

Note, too, that if the Big Four were actually coordinating a withholding campaign to punish USDA, that would be squarely in Packers & Stockyards Act and antitrust territory — and there is no evidence of that. The simpler explanation, and the one the numbers support, is that packers are finally exercising leverage the market handed them.

Equities today

Global markets were mixed as investors awaited a major round of corporate earnings that could test Wall Street’s AI-fueled rally, while escalating tensions in the Middle East kept risk appetite in check. U.S. Dow opened up 139 points higher after major North American indexes ended Friday’s session in negative territory.

Investors on Wall Street were assessing results from Domino’s Pizza Inc. and Steel Dynamics Inc. Domino’s missed sales and earnings estimates for a second consecutive quarter, highlighting persistent pressure from sluggish demand, stronger competition and broader economic uncertainty.

In Asia, Japan closed. Hong Kong +2.4%. China +0.9%. India -0.6%.

In Europe, at midday, London -0.5%. Paris +0.1%. Frankfurt flat.

USDA daily export sales

•      264,000 MT soybeans to China,
•      110,000 MT soybeans to unknown, and
•      100,000 MT corn to Colombia for 2026/27

Weather rally rolls on: beans surge 19 cents, corn firms as heat grips northern Plains

Soy complex leads overnight advance on crop-stress fears; wheat lags with SRW flat

Grain and soybean futures extended their weather-driven advance in overnight trade, with the soy complex doing the heavy lifting. August soybeans jumped 19 cents to $12.235, August meal added $2.10 to $322.30 and August soyoil firmed 25 points to 75.06. September corn gained 7½ cents to $4.5225, while wheat was the laggard — September SRW finished the overnight session unchanged at $6.8275 and September HRW edged up 1¼ cents to $7.335.

The bullish fundamental story remains the same one that carried corn and beans to multi-week highs earlier this month: an entrenched ridge of high pressure baking the northern Plains and western Corn Belt. Triple-digit readings have been common across the Dakotas, with more than two dozen all-time high temperatures set across a half-dozen states in recent days. Forecasters see limited rainfall relief over the next week to 10 days, putting dryland acres in Nebraska, South Dakota, southwestern Minnesota and northwestern Iowa at the greatest risk during pollination and early pod-set — the yield-determining window for both crops.

The overnight strength in beans reflects the crop’s acute sensitivity to August weather and razor-thin margin for error on the balance sheet: analysts note that each one-bushel-per-acre cut to the national soybean yield trims new-crop ending stocks by more than 70 million bushels. Traders are also beginning to position ahead of USDA’s Aug. 12 Crop Production report — the first of the season based on farmer surveys rather than statistical models — which gives the department its first real opportunity to mark yields to actual field conditions.

Corn’s more measured gains reflect its bigger production cushion and the fact that much of the eastern Belt remains in good shape. Wheat, largely a spectator to the row-crop weather story with winter wheat harvest winding down, continues to trade off export flows and spillover support from corn — enough to keep HRW modestly firmer but not enough to move SRW off unchanged.

Paris corn rockets to contract high as European grain markets firm

EU corn at $7.38 per bushel towers over U.S. values; nominal Russian wheat offers near $6.53 still anchor the world export floor

European grain futures extended their advance Monday, led by a fresh contract high in Paris corn, while palm oil firmed and Black Sea wheat trade remained thin ahead of the peak Russian harvest push. The U.S. dollar was steady, a neutral influence on export competitiveness.

Paris wheat edges higher

Euronext (MATIF) milling wheat futures gained €1.00 to €235.50 per metric ton — about $269.05 per ton, or $7.32 per bushel at the current exchange rate of roughly $1.1425 per euro. That keeps European wheat at a premium of around $1.00 per bushel to Chicago soft red winter wheat futures, which settled near $6.31 in mid-July trade. The premium reflects a smaller-than-expected Western European crop and steady North African and Middle Eastern import demand, and it leaves U.S. wheat competitively priced into destinations where freight works.

Paris corn: a new contract high

The headline move came in corn, where the Paris August contract posted a new contract high of €254.50 per metric ton — roughly $290.75 per ton, or $7.38 per bushel. That is an extraordinary premium of about $3.00 per bushel over Chicago corn futures, which have traded in the $4.30s as U.S. traders brace for a potential 16-billion-bushel crop. The message of the spread is unambiguous: European feed grain supplies are tight, hot and dry conditions have trimmed EU crop prospects, and the wide premium should pull import demand toward U.S. and South American corn in the months ahead — a supportive undercurrent for U.S. export business even as domestic new-crop supplies build.

Russian wheat: nominal offers set the floor

In highly nominal trade — few actual deals are being struck this early in the export campaign — spot Russian wheat for early-August shipment is offered at $240 per metric ton FOB, equal to about $6.53 per bushel. That is roughly $29 per ton below the Paris equivalent and confirms Russia’s role as the price-setter at the bottom of the world wheat market. As harvest volume builds through August, Russian offers typically become firmer indications; until then, the $240 level should be read as a marker, not a market. Still, it caps rallies elsewhere: importers know cheap Black Sea supplies are coming.

Note: See the latest weather forecasts for the above region in the Weather section below.

Palm oil and crude: mixed signals for the oilseed complex

Malaysian August palm oil futures rose 39 ringgit to 4,568 ringgit per metric ton — about $1,119 per ton, or 50.75 cents per pound at roughly 4.08 ringgit to the dollar. Firm palm values are supportive for the broader vegetable-oil complex, including U.S. soybean oil, at a time when biofuel feedstock demand remains the swing factor in the soy crush. September WTI crude oil futures slipped 35 cents to $81.43 per barrel — a modest setback, but crude above $80 continues to underpin biofuel economics and, indirectly, corn and soyoil demand.

Screwworm reaches the Texas/Mexico border as two new counties confirm infestations

APHIS logs Starr and Schleicher County cases in its July 18 update; the statewide count climbs to 41 even as officials describe a slow, steady southward creep

The New World screwworm (NWS) continued its measured advance across Texas this week as USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) confirmed the parasite in two counties where it had not previously been recorded. A case in cattle in Starr County and a case in sheep in Schleicher County were both confirmed on July 18, according to the agency. The Schleicher County case was already listed as inactive at the time of confirmation, while the Starr County case — the southernmost detection in the state to date — remains active.

The Starr County finding carries outsized weight because of where it sits. The county lies directly on the Rio Grande, sharing a border with Mexico, and its confirmation pushes the leading edge of documented infestation to the very doorstep of the international boundary that federal and state officials have been working to hold. Local leaders in Starr County said they are coordinating with the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) and partner agencies to contain the case, and have urged residents to report any animals with unusual wounds while cautioning against panic.

With these two additions and other adjustments to the case log, APHIS now places the statewide total at 41 confirmations — 29 inactive and 12 active. July alone has accounted for 10 confirmations, 9 of which remain active, whereas only 3 of the cases confirmed back in June are still listed as active. That contrast is the clearest signal in the data of how the outbreak is aging: newer cases dominate the active column, while older ones steadily migrate to inactive status as affected animals are treated and cleared.

Table 1. New World screwworm case status in Texas

Source: USDA APHIS confirmed-detections reporting, as of July 18, 2026.

Two data points reinforce the impression of an outbreak that is expanding but not accelerating uncontrollably. APHIS continues to report no detections in wildlife or feral animals, and no fly-trap detections — two of the surveillance channels that would most likely signal an established, self-sustaining insect population rather than a series of individual, traceable livestock cases. As long as those columns stay at zero, the pattern is consistent with importation and localized spread that response teams can chase down case by case.

The pace matters for interpretation. Ten confirmations in a single month is an uptick, but the fact that the majority of June’s cases have already been resolved to inactive status suggests the response cycle — detection, treatment, and clearance — is functioning. The situation, while clearly widening geographically, is still moving at a relatively slow pace, and more cases continue to shift to inactive status even as new ones appear.

Table 2. The two newly affected counties (confirmed July 18, 2026)

Source: USDA APHIS.

Map 1. Where the new cases fall — and the quarantine footprint

Figure: New World screwworm confirmations and the Texas quarantine zone. Map reading: the dark-red counties (Starr and Schleicher) mark the July 18 confirmations; orange marks Zavala County, site of the first U.S. detection; and the shaded band shows the roughly 20-county quarantine zone across South and West Texas. Starr County anchors the southern end of that band, directly on the Mexican border.

Analysis: a containment fight measured in counties, not weeks

The geography on the map tells the strategic story. The confirmed cases and the quarantine footprint together trace a corridor running from west-central Texas down toward the border, and Starr County’s appearance at the southern tip is exactly the kind of movement animal health officials have been bracing for. Under the state’s response framework, warm-blooded animals cannot leave infested zones without inspection and movement certificates, ranchers are asked to monitor wounds and newborn navels, and sterile male flies are released to collapse the pest’s ability to reproduce — the core of the sterile insect technique that eradicated screwworm from the United States decades ago.

For readers weighing how alarmed to be, the honest answer sits between two poles. On one hand, the parasite has now been confirmed in more counties, has reached the border, and is producing new active cases faster than old ones can be closed in the very latest monthly slice. On the other hand, the absence of wildlife, feral-animal, and fly-trap detections is genuinely reassuring, and the steady conversion of older cases to inactive status shows the treatment-and-clearance machinery is keeping up. The trajectory is one of expansion, not yet of runaway establishment.

What to watch next is straightforward. A first detection in wildlife or a positive fly trap would change the risk picture materially, because it would imply the insect is reproducing in the environment rather than arriving with individual animals. A confirmation east or north of the current corridor would suggest the quarantine band is not holding. For now, the July 18 update reads as an outbreak that is spreading on the map while remaining, case by case, under active management.

Friday: diplomacy checks oil’s war premium after WTI briefly tops $85

WTI retreats toward $80, but Hormuz disruptions keep upside risk elevated

Crude oil surrendered a sharp early advance Monday as tentative diplomatic signals from Iran prompted traders to reduce some of the immediate war premium embedded in prices. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude briefly climbed above $85 per barrel before retreating to roughly $80, while Brent crude pulled back from an intraday high above $91 to around $86. The reversal followed reports that international mediators had presented Tehran with proposals intended to lower tensions and potentially establish a 10-day ceasefire.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry said diplomatic contacts remained active and indicated that negotiations with the United States could continue when consistent with Iran’s national interests. That language stopped well short of signaling an agreement, but it was enough to change the market’s immediate calculation from imminent escalation toward at least the possibility of renewed talks.

The early price surge reflected another weekend of escalating military activity. U.S. and Iranian forces exchanged attacks, commercial vessels attempting to move through the Strait of Hormuz were targeted, and Kuwait Petroleum Corp. reported significant damage and injuries after an Iranian strike on one of its oil facilities. Tanker traffic through Hormuz has fallen sharply, reinforcing concerns about the availability and cost of Middle Eastern crude supplies.

However, the pullback toward $80 should not be interpreted as a return to normal market conditions. There is no confirmed ceasefire, shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains restricted, and attacks have expanded beyond military targets to vessels and regional energy infrastructure. The strait handled roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas trade before the war, leaving the market unusually exposed to even brief interruptions.

The key distinction is between diplomatic contact and actual de-escalation. Mediator proposals may reduce the probability of an immediate supply shock, but a durable decline in crude prices likely requires verifiable steps: an end to attacks on commercial shipping, reopening of normal transit lanes and assurances that Gulf oil facilities will not be targeted.

Until those conditions emerge, crude prices are likely to remain volatile with a substantial geopolitical premium. WTI’s brief move above $85 demonstrates how quickly prices can rise when shipping risk intensifies. Conversely, the retreat toward $80 shows that traders remain reluctant to hold maximum-risk positions whenever negotiations appear possible.

For agriculture and the broader economy, the continued premium matters even without another sustained oil rally. Elevated crude prices translate into higher diesel, transportation and fertilizer-related costs, while adding to inflation concerns that could complicate the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate outlook. The market’s base case may be shifting toward diplomacy, but its risk case remains a renewed disruption capable of sending crude sharply higher again.

Brazil Section 301 tariffs put tallow and biofuel trade in the crosshairs

25% duties target tallow, ethanol and sugar while food staples stay exempt

The Trump administration’s Section 301 action against Brazil is now formally on the books. A presidential memorandum and detailed tariff notice published in the Federal Register impose an additional 25% duty on Brazilian products unless they are specifically exempted, effective at 12:01 a.m. ET Wednesday, July 22. The yearlong investigation examined Brazil’s policies involving digital trade and electronic payments, preferential tariffs, anti-corruption enforcement, intellectual property protection, ethanol market access and illegal deforestation. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the decision followed consultations with Brazil, two public hearings and more than 360 written comments.

A deliberately selective tariff. Although the legal action is framed as a 25% tariff on Brazilian goods, the lengthy exemption annex substantially narrows the economic impact. Beef, coffee, orange juice, certain seafood, energy products, critical minerals, aircraft and aircraft parts, pharmaceuticals, pig iron and several other raw materials will remain outside the new tariff. The exclusions appear designed to avoid immediate increases in highly visible grocery prices and disruptions to U.S. industrial supply chains.

The tariff will apply to Brazilian ethanol, sugar, furniture, footwear, machinery, paper products and other manufactured goods. Brazilian officials estimate the final action will affect approximately $7 billion in annual exports—around 18% of Brazil’s shipments to the U.S. — after the administration expanded the exemption list from its original proposal.

Brazil Section 301: treatment of key products and sectors

Tallow is the agricultural-market sleeper. The exclusion of Brazilian beef does not extend to beef tallow. The final tariff annex contains the HTS classifications for exempt beef and other animal products, but it does not exempt heading 1502, which covers tallow and other fats from cattle, sheep and goats. That means Brazilian tallow entering the U.S. will generally be subject to the additional 25% duty.

That is potentially important for the renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel sectors. Brazil shipped roughly 300,000 metric tons of tallow to the U.S. in 2024. Through July 2025, the U.S. accounted for almost 98% of Brazil’s tallow exports, demonstrating how dependent the trade had become on U.S. biofuel demand.

The likely market effects include:

•      Higher landed feedstock costs. Unless Brazilian exporters sharply reduce their prices, the tariff makes imported tallow materially more expensive for U.S. renewable diesel, sustainable aviation fuel, oleochemical and food-sector users.
•      Support for domestic fats and oils. U.S. tallow, used cooking oil, distillers corn oil and—at the margin—soybean oil could receive additional demand as refiners reconsider their feedstock mix. The impact on soybean oil is likely to be supportive rather than automatically explosive because refiners also weigh carbon-intensity scores, pretreatment costs, logistics and the value of applicable federal and state incentives.
•      More tallow retained in Brazil. Brazilian companies were already exploring greater domestic use of tallow in biodiesel production because earlier U.S. tariffs reduced the attractiveness of exports. Cargill said in June that it was studying the feasibility of using tallow at its Brazilian biodiesel operations.

In other words, the tariff could divide the market: firmer prices for qualifying U.S. feedstocks, weaker export values for Brazilian tallow and greater Brazilian use of animal fats in domestic biodiesel.

Ethanol and sugar also take a direct hit. Brazilian ethanol and sugar were not exempted. Brazil shipped 253 million liters of ethanol worth $163 million to the U.S. in 2025, making the U.S. its second-largest ethanol export market. Brazil also shipped approximately 420,000 metric tons of sugar to the U.S. last year.

For U.S. corn ethanol producers, the tariff provides some competitive protection against Brazilian sugarcane ethanol, particularly in coastal and low-carbon fuel markets. But it could raise costs for U.S. blenders that value Brazilian ethanol’s carbon profile. In sugar, the tariff may further constrain an already managed import market and add costs for refiners and food manufacturers sourcing Brazilian raw sugar.

The agricultural impact therefore cuts in both directions: U.S. ethanol and domestic feedstock suppliers gain protection, while renewable-fuel plants and food processors dependent on Brazilian inputs face higher costs.

A two-day tariff overlap. The July 22 start date creates a brief overlap with the administration’s 10% Section 122 import surcharge. That surcharge remains effective through 12:01 a.m. ET July 24 and generally applies in addition to other duties, except for specified Section 232 products. The Brazil Section 301 notice also provides that its tariff can be added to other applicable duties. Consequently, Brazilian products covered by both measures could temporarily face an additional 35 percentage points of tariff during July 22 and July 23, before the Section 122 surcharge expires.

There is a narrow in-transit exception. Brazilian products loaded and already in final transit before 12:01 a.m. ET July 22 may avoid the new Section 301 duty if they are entered for consumption before 12:01 a.m. ET July 29.

Negotiations remain possible — but retaliation is the nearer-term risk. USTR explicitly retained the authority to modify or terminate the action if Brazil changes the practices identified in the investigation. Greer has said the U.S. remains open to negotiations, but neither government has announced a new negotiating round ahead of the effective date.

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has instructed his government to begin proceedings under Brazil’s Reciprocity Law and to challenge the U.S. action through the World Trade Organization. Any retaliation could affect U.S. agricultural exports, even though Brazil is a comparatively small market. U.S. agricultural exports to Brazil totaled approximately $925 million in 2025, led by products including dairy, ethanol and animal feed.

The greater risk is escalation rather than the initial tariff alone. Brazil is also included in a separate USTR Section 301 investigation involving countries’ enforcement against forced labor. If the administration adopts the proposed tariff remedy in that case, some Brazilian products could face an additional 12.5% duty on top of the new Brazil-specific action.

NWS national outlook

•      High concentrations of Canadian wildfire smoke to affect the Great Lakes area over the next few days.
•      A strong southeastward moving frontal system to support active thunderstorms from the Northern Plains to the Mid-Atlantic.
•      T.D. Two to bring heavy rain threats to the northeast Gulf coast.
•      Monsoonal thunderstorms to continue over the next few days from the Southwest into the Great Basin.
•      Hazardous heat builds from the Northern Plains into the Lower Mississippi Valley.

Source: National Weather Service.

U.S. heat breaks briefly, but Corn Belt dryness becomes the bigger threat

Rainfall deficits deepen as crop stress shifts from heat to moisture loss

Central U.S. crops face a two-stage weather threat: an immediate burst of intense heat followed by a more persistent shortage of rainfall. Daytime highs across the Western Corn Belt and Central Plains are expected to exceed 95 to 100 degrees on Monday, July 20, before a cooler pattern takes hold from Tuesday through Saturday. The cooldown should ease near-term heat stress, but it will offer only limited relief where meaningful rain fails to develop.

The greater concern shifts to the six- to 15-day outlook. A strong high-pressure ridge is forecast to settle over the Southwest, placing the Corn Belt beneath a high-amplitude northwesterly flow. Major weather models have converged on below-normal rainfall during both the six- to 10-day and 11- to 15-day periods, a pattern that would accelerate soil-moisture losses while corn and soybeans move through critical reproductive and grain-filling stages.

The Western Corn Belt and northern Plains appear most vulnerable. The northern Plains are projected to receive negligible rainfall for roughly 10 days, with extreme heat returning by July 24 and compounding already severe moisture depletion. In the hard red winter wheat belt, widespread dryness will continue through Tuesday before northern areas receive a brief chance for thunderstorms from Wednesday through Friday. Temperatures are then expected to run 5 to 10 degrees above normal beginning July 26, with warm nighttime readings limiting recovery for crops, pastures and livestock.

The Mid-South also remains under pressure, with temperatures averaging 2 to 4 degrees above normal and rainfall staying below normal. The lack of widespread runoff is unlikely to improve critically low river levels, adding a transportation risk for barge navigation and grain movement if the dry pattern persists.

For agricultural markets, the cooler stretch this week may temporarily limit the immediate weather premium. However, growing model agreement on an extended rainfall deficit should keep corn and soybean prices highly sensitive to forecast changes. The key question is whether scattered storms can provide enough coverage across the western and central Corn Belt before continued moisture loss begins to reduce yield potential.

Europe’s crop outlook darkens as Black Sea fields get brief relief

Western Europe stays parched while Ukraine and Russia receive temporary rain

Western Europe: persistent dryness deepens yield risk

Europe’s crop-weather outlook remains sharply unfavorable, with persistent dryness threatening to deepen yield losses across major western production areas. England, France and Spain are expected to remain exceptionally dry during the next five days, followed by only limited rainfall during the 6- to 10-day and 11- to 15-day periods. Combined totals of less than 0.75 inch will offer little meaningful relief, particularly as temperatures trend near to above normal during the second week of the forecast.

The greatest concern is the European corn crop, which is highly vulnerable to moisture shortages during pollination and grain filling. Continued dryness will accelerate soil-moisture depletion, reduce kernel set and shorten the grain-fill period in areas already struggling with heat and inadequate rainfall. The forecast therefore raises the risk of further cuts to production estimates and could increase Europe’s need for imported feed grains later in the marketing year.

Map 1. Western Europe: England, France and Spain remain exceptionally dry, with 15-day rainfall totals under 0.75 inch and corn at highest risk during pollination and grain fill.

Black Sea region: temporary rain relief for Ukraine and southern Russia

Conditions are somewhat more favorable in the Black Sea region. Winter wheat and corn areas in Ukraine and Russia are projected to receive above-normal rainfall during the 6- to 10-day period, providing a temporary boost to soil moisture and helping stabilize crops. However, the return of drier conditions in the 11- to 15-day window means the improvement may be brief, particularly for corn that still requires sustained moisture through late-season development.

Map 2. Black Sea region: above-normal rain in the 6- to 10-day period stabilizes winter wheat and corn in Ukraine and southern Russia, but drier weather returns in days 11–15.

Russian spring wheat: early support, then a week-two drying trend

Russian spring wheat faces a more uneven outlook. Near- to above-normal precipitation during the next five days should provide short-term support, but a significant drying trend during Week Two will intensify late-season stress. If the drier pattern persists, yield potential could deteriorate as the crop moves through heading and grain filling, adding uncertainty to Russia’s overall wheat production and export outlook.

Map 3. Russian spring wheat belt: rain in the next five days offers short-term support, but a significant Week-Two drying trend threatens the crop through heading and grain fill.

Market implications: a widening regional split

The market implication is a widening regional split: western Europe faces escalating maize and feed-grain risk, while Ukraine and southern Russia receive only a temporary weather reprieve. That contrast could sustain a weather premium in European grain markets and place greater attention on Black Sea export availability. Any reduction in European maize output would also increase competition for imported corn and alternative feed grains, potentially lending support to global prices even if Black Sea wheat supplies remain comparatively adequate.