POLICY  •  NEWS  •  MARKETS

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY

SATURDAY, AUGUST 29, 2026   |   SPECIAL REPORT & ANALYSIS

WEEK AHEAD  |  AGRICULTURE, TRADE, ENERGY AND THE ECONOMY

Week Ahead: The House Gets Four Days, Monday Gets Three Decisions, and Friday Gets the Jobs Number

The House returns Aug. 31 for a single week and the Senate stays gone until Sept. 14 — but EPA, USDA and the White House all move Monday, the continuing resolution reaches the House floor Tuesday under a two-thirds threshold, and the August employment report closes the week as the last labor reading before a Fed meeting the market now prices as a coin flip on a rate increase.

Analysis  ·  August 29, 2026

Congress comes back to a calendar with almost nothing in it and one thing that has to get done. The House convenes at noon Monday with first votes at 6:30 p.m., works four days, and takes its last votes no later than 3 p.m. Thursday before leaving for Labor Day. The Senate does not return until 3 p.m. Monday, Sept. 14. Inside that narrow window sits HR 6500, the Senate-passed stopgap funding the government to Dec. 11, scheduled for the House floor Tuesday under suspension of the rules. Pass it and it goes to the president’s desk and a pre-election shutdown disappears. Amend it and it goes back to a chamber that is not in town. Everything else this week happens around that vote — three federal decisions landing Monday, a Beige Book Wednesday, and on Friday morning the August jobs report, which is now the only thing standing between the market and a September rate increase.

Three decisions land Monday, Aug. 31, and none of them requires Congress: EPA on small refinery exemptions, USDA on small meat processors, and the Federal Register publication of a beef import proclamation the president signed Aug. 26. That is the shape of this fall — the executive branch acting on its own timetable while the legislative branch has roughly 13 shared working days left before Nov. 3.

The markets that receive all of this are not the ones that closed three weeks ago. December wheat rose 12.1% in the week ended Aug. 28 to a contract and three-year high on Black Sea shipping risk; December corn added 5.5% and November soybeans 3.9%, both to contract highs; December soybean meal gained 7.1% to its best level in more than two years. Cattle went the other direction, with October live cattle down $6.20 and November feeders down $6.325 on a run of policy headlines. And on Friday, Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh used his first Jackson Hole keynote to put a rate increase back on the table, which lifted the dollar to its best week in ten and gave every one of those rallies a new headwind to trade against.

Figure 1. Weekly change in new-crop and front-month futures, week ended Aug. 28, 2026. Sources: CME Group settlements; Ag Policy & Markets Daily calculations.

Monday: three federal decisions, none of them congressional

Figure 2. What lands Monday, Aug. 31, and what each decision turns on. Sources: EPA, USDA, the White House, Federal Register.

The first is EPA’s. The agency has said it intends to clear its backlog of small refinery exemption petitions by the end of August, and Monday is the last day of the month. Thirty-four petitions are pending, some dating to July 2024. 

The second is USDA’s: Secretary Brooke Rollins says the department will begin making announcements Monday at the Nebraska State Fair on making it easier for farmers, ranchers and small plants to process meat. 

The third is quieter and already decided — the proclamation opening 300,000 metric tons of tariff-free lean beef trimmings, signed Aug. 26, publishes in the Federal Register Monday, with the first 100,000-tonne window opening Tuesday.

Taken together they are a fair summary of where farm policy is being made this year. Two of the three land on cattle producers who have spent the month absorbing one federal action after another, and the third decides how much biofuel demand exists for a soybean crop that is about to be harvested. None of them needed a vote.

Congress: four days, and one vote that matters

The House is back Monday, Aug. 31 — convening at noon for morning hour, 2 p.m. for legislative business, with votes postponed to 6:30 p.m. It runs Tuesday at 11 a.m., Wednesday at 10 a.m. and Thursday at 9 a.m., with last votes expected no later than 3 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 3. Then it is gone for the Labor Day week. The Senate has been in pro forma session since Aug. 10 and does not return for business until 3 p.m. Monday, Sept. 14.

Figure 3. The pre-election legislative calendar. Blue marks a scheduled session week. The House gets four days now and then waits for the Senate; Sept. 30 is when both FY 2026 appropriations authority and the farm bill extension expire. Sources: Office of the Majority Leader, Senate 2026 legislative schedule, Roll Call.

The one item that can actually be finished in four days is the funding bill, and it is on the schedule for Tuesday. The Senate passed HR 6500, the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027, by 90-6 at 3:37 a.m. on Saturday, Aug. 8, carrying the government to Dec. 11 and extending the National Flood Insurance Program and Livestock Mandatory Reporting to the same date. The House passed its own version 220-205 on July 21, running only to Dec. 4 and without the Senate’s temporary bar on political appointees implementing the Office of Management and Budget grant rule. The Office of Management and Budget has already issued a Statement of Administration Policy supporting the Senate text and recommending the president sign it.

The mechanics are the story. The bill comes up under suspension of the rules, which means it needs two-thirds of those voting rather than a simple majority — and it means no amendments. That is not an accident. Any change would have to go back to a Senate that will not be in session for another 11 days, with the fiscal year ending Sept. 30. So Tuesday is effectively take it or leave it: pass the Senate text and the bill goes to the president and the pre-election shutdown threat is retired; fall short of two-thirds and leadership has to find a rule, floor time and a majority in the three weeks after Sept. 14.

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has signaled the Senate bill should be able to pass the House. The two-thirds threshold is the risk, not the majority: the Senate’s 90-6 margin shows the bipartisan appetite, but House conservatives have objected both to the December date and to the OMB grant rider, and a suspension vote gives them a cheap way to register it. Watch the whip count Monday night rather than the rhetoric.

Almost nothing else on the agricultural list can move this week. The House Ag Committee has no hearings or markups scheduled, which means the $12 billion in farm economic assistance is not advancing: what passed on July 22 was a budget resolution, 216-214, opening a reconciliation pathway — not an aid bill — and Senate Republicans pulled their companion vote on Aug. 7. Reporting now suggests Republicans are increasingly likely to punt the reconciliation package past the midterms entirely. Ag Chairman John Boozman’s (R-Ark.) pledge to revote the farm bill in the Senate Ag Committee during “the first week” of September collides with a Senate that does not return until Sept. 14, and no business meeting has been noticed. The separate $11.1 billion emergency farm aid supplemental remains before Senate appropriators.

Table 1. What four House days can and cannot do. Sources: Office of the Majority Leader weekly schedule, Congressional Budget Office suspension list, Senate roll call votes, House and Senate Agriculture Committees, Office of Management and Budget.

EPA: the decision the soy complex has been waiting for

For the soybean complex, and to a lesser degree corn, Monday is the day. EPA has committed to resolving its small refinery exemption backlog by the end of August, and the trade has been pricing the range for two weeks.

Figure 4. The exemption range and the questions that come with it. Sources: EPA, Reuters, American Soybean Association, Ag Policy & Markets Daily analysis.

The arithmetic is straightforward and the consequences are not. EPA’s final 2026-2027 rule, announced March 27, set total volumes at 26.81 billion RINs for 2026 and 27.02 billion for 2027, with biomass-based diesel at 9.07 billion and 9.20 billion gallons, and it assumed roughly 990 million RINs worth of exemptions while reallocating 70% of exempted 2023-2025 obligations. Reuters has reported the administration weighing exemptions of 1.2 billion to 1.8 billion RINs. At the top of that range, roughly 1.1 billion RINs would go unreallocated under the existing 70% policy — something on the order of 8.4 billion gallons of obligated fuel sitting outside the mandate.

The proposed sweetener is a promise about next year. Reuters reported Aug. 27 that the administration is considering adding roughly 500 million gallons to 2027 requirements to offset a larger exemption package now, and that the president discussed the question with agency heads Aug. 26. The trade has already given the idea a nickname — the Wimpy plan, after the Popeye character who would gladly pay Tuesday for a hamburger today. The analogy is doing real analytical work. Refiners would get relief that binds immediately; growers and biofuel producers would get compensation that binds in 2027, if it binds at all. Traders are unlikely to value a 2027 promise at par unless the mechanism restoring the waived volumes is specific, enforceable and large enough to cover what was waived.

The exposure is concentrated in soybean oil, which closed the week at 71.06 cents on December futures after a 148-point gain. The American Soybean Association puts about 500 million gallons of biodiesel and renewable diesel demand and roughly $1 billion of soybean farmer revenue at risk. Its vice president, Dave Walton: “At a time when soybean farmers are already struggling to support our farms, we cannot afford for the rug to be pulled out from under one of our most important sources of domestic demand.” The Renewable Fuels Association, Growth Energy and the National Farmers Union joined a letter to the president in the last week of August warning that the consequences of expanded exemptions would be “severe and immediate” and would “decimate the demand signal.” Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) called the exemptions “a handout to Big Oil falsely marketed as relief at the pump.” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said expansion would be “catastrophic to biofuels.” The White House says only that it will make the decision that is best for consumers, farmers and energy supply chains.

The market has already moved on the speculation. Conventional ethanol D6 RINs fell to $1.75 on Aug. 24, down 34 cents in a week and the lowest since April 15, against a July 7 peak of $2.50; D4 biomass-based diesel RINs are near $1.92, the weakest since late April. EPA separately sent a rule to the Office of Management and Budget on Aug. 26 extending the 2025 RFS compliance reporting deadline, which had been Sept. 1 — a procedural move the trade read as clearing the runway for a large exemption package.

Two cautions worth carrying into Monday. First, EPA has missed soft deadlines before, and a decision that slips past Aug. 31 is itself a market event — it would extend the uncertainty into the September crush and harvest window rather than resolving it. Second, the number that matters is not the headline RIN total but the reallocation percentage attached to it. A 1.8-billion-RIN package with full reallocation is a materially different outcome for soybean oil than a 1.2-billion-RIN package with 70%.

Behind Monday sits a larger deadline nobody is going to meet. RFS Set 3, covering 2028 volumes, carries a statutory deadline of Nov. 1 for a final rule. The proposal has not gone to the Office of Management and Budget and does not appear on EPA’s regulatory agenda. Trade expectation is a proposal late this year at the earliest and a final rule in the first half of 2027.

Trump, Rollins and the packers

The livestock side of Monday started with a Truth Social post Friday. “So in order to break this powerful monopoly, with much of its ownership based outside the U.S.,” the president wrote, “I am authorizing legal documents to be drawn in order to allow Farmers and Ranchers to be given the right to PROCESS THEIR OWN FOOD.” He described the four largest packers — Tyson, Cargill, JBS and National Beef — as “a very non-competitive number” and a “nasty Monopoly,” adding: “They make life miserable for our wonderful Farmers and Ranchers, and I can’t let that happen, can I?” Those four companies handle roughly 85% of U.S. beef processing.

Rollins answered on X — “We’re on it Mr. President!” — and said USDA would begin making announcements Monday, starting at the Nebraska State Fair. She listed seven areas: waiving processing red tape; expanding ranchers’ ability to sell across state lines; rescinding outdated guidance; using technology to speed food-safety data; funding and deregulation for small processors; addressing consolidation so smaller plants can compete; and expanding truth-in-labeling policies.

What is achievable is narrower than the framing. Federal meat inspection requirements are rooted in statute, so USDA cannot eliminate them by guidance or executive order. The workable levers are real but incremental: expanding participation in the Cooperative Interstate Shipment program, which lets state-inspected plants with fewer than 25 employees ship across state lines; grants and technical assistance for small and regional plants; inspection modernization; and labeling. A PRIME Act pilot — allowing custom-exempt facilities to sell directly to in-state consumers under specific labeling — already rides in Section 12114 of the House-passed farm bill, HR 7567, and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) has used the moment to press for the standalone bill, HR 4700.

The reaction split along predictable lines and one unpredictable one. The Meat Institute warned that allowing uninspected meat into commercial markets “would put consumers at risk and undermine the food safety system that protects millions of Americans.” The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, which spent the previous week fighting the president on beef imports, landed in the same place here: “weakening federal meat inspection and food safety standards … is not the answer,” urging the administration instead to address fuel and fertilizer costs and animal disease. R-CALF USA was the most supportive — CEO Bill Bullard called attention to the monopolistic structure a positive, while noting the details are not there yet. Running underneath all of it is a Justice Department criminal antitrust investigation into the four major beef processors, opened this spring. Some others noted that all this is happening when packers are hemorrhaging money at the moment.

More regional processing capacity would be structurally bullish for cattle producers over time, because it creates more bidding competition for animals. But plants require capital, workers, permits and years. Monday’s package can improve the long-run structure of the industry without adding meaningful slaughter capacity this year — which is precisely the gap between how the announcement will be received politically and what it does to the fed cattle supply curve.

The beef proclamation is signed, and Brazil is the winner

The third Monday item is already law. “Further Ensuring Affordable Beef for the American Consumer,” signed Aug. 26, publishes in the Federal Register Monday. It opens 300,000 metric tons of lean beef trimmings in three 100,000-tonne tranches — Sept. 1-30, Oct. 1-30 and Oct. 31-Nov. 30 — on a first-come, first-served basis, using authority under Section 404 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974. The rationale cited is a cattle herd at a 75-year low, screwworm restrictions on Mexican cattle and a projected 4% decline in production against 2025.

The detail that matters commercially is where the tonnage goes and how it is priced. It is allocated to the “other countries or areas” category — the bucket for suppliers without country-specific quotas. That excludes Argentina, Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, all of which hold their own quotas, and it makes Brazil and Paraguay the practical beneficiaries. For Brazil, it waives a 26.4% out-of-quota duty for three months. Link to our special report regarding pricing issues. 

U.S. Cattlemen’s Association President Justin Tupper, on Aug. 28: “Producers are already starting to feel the effects of this action in the markets this week — which were down across the board for multiple days,” adding that “there is still time to change course.” October live cattle finished the week at $211.725, down $6.20, and November feeders at $309.925, down $6.325. Both are technically damaged.

Set against that, the physical flow from the other policy change remains small. The Douglas, Arizona port reopened to Mexican cattle Monday, Aug. 24 and cleared 700 head that day, 600 on each of Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, and none at all on Friday — 2,500 head for the first full week, from a country that supplied more than a million cattle a year before the closure and about 3% of total U.S. cattle supplies. Santa Teresa and Columbus, New Mexico remain under evaluation. Oklahoma State University’s Derrell Peel estimates perhaps 150,000 head for the remainder of 2026 under a measured reopening. The futures market has been trading the direction of policy considerably harder than the cattle numbers justify. 

Friday is the week: the August employment report

The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the August employment situation at 8:30 a.m. ET Friday, Sept. 4. It is the last major labor reading before the Sept. 15-16 FOMC meeting, and after Friday it is the only thing standing between the market and a September rate increase.

Figure 5. Left: how the May and June payroll prints changed after revision. Right: the consensus for Friday and the benchmark revision published Aug. 28. Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Wells Fargo Economics and Bloomberg consensus; Trading Economics.

Start with the hole the July report left. Nonfarm payrolls fell 23,000 against a consensus near +80,000, and the revisions did more damage than the headline: May was cut 66,000 to +63,000 and June 37,000 to +20,000, erasing 103,000 jobs that had already been reported. The unemployment rate held at 4.1% and average hourly earnings rose 3.2% from a year earlier. The three-month average of post-revision prints is roughly +20,000 a month.

Then came Friday, Aug. 28, which delivered two more blows before Fed Chair Kevin Warsh even spoke. BLS published its preliminary benchmark revision at 10 a.m.: total nonfarm employment for the year through March 2026 was marked down 79,000, with private payrolls down 178,000 against government up 99,000, cutting annual job growth from roughly 273,000 to about 194,000. Worth noting in fairness: at 0.1% of employment, that revision is smaller than the decade average and far milder than the prior year’s. Separately, the MNI Chicago PMI collapsed to 47.1 from 57.6, the first sub-50 reading in four months and a 10-point miss against forecast.

Consensus for Friday sits in a range rather than at a point, which is itself informative. Trading Economics carries +45,000; the Bloomberg consensus in Wells Fargo’s week-ahead table is +58,000, with Wells Fargo’s own house forecast at +80,000. On the unemployment rate the published consensus is 4.1%, but both Trading Economics and Wells Fargo look for 4.2%. Average hourly earnings are seen at +0.2% to +0.3% on the month against +0.1% in July. Private payrolls consensus is +50,000 against +30,000, with Wells Fargo at +72,000.

Table 2. The U.S. financial calendar, Aug. 31 – Sept. 4. Consensus and house forecasts as of Aug. 28. Also on the calendar: Dallas Fed manufacturing Monday; ADP employment Wednesday, 8:15 a.m.; jobless claims and Challenger job cuts Thursday. Sources: Wells Fargo Economics and Bloomberg Finance L.P.; Trading Economics; Bureau of Labor Statistics; Census Bureau; Institute for Supply Management; Federal Reserve Board.

Warsh is the reason Friday carries this much weight. In his first Jackson Hole keynote as chairman he said recent data “do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved,” and set a condition: “We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective clearly and at sufficient speed. Otherwise, we have work to do.” He cited consumer prices at 3.4% over the twelve months through July and the Fed’s preferred gauge at 3.7%, against a 2% target, and he described formal forward guidance as a practice that “has overstayed its welcome,” arguing that “a quieter Fed, more purposeful in its communications, is better able to meet its objectives.” He did not commit to an increase. He closed by saying he was committed to a discipline, not to a decision.

Figure 6. Market-implied odds of a quarter-point increase at the Sept. 16 FOMC meeting, before and after the Jackson Hole keynote. Source: CME FedWatch.

The market did not wait. Odds of a quarter-point increase on Sept. 16 jumped from about 35.4% before the speech to roughly 57.5% after it. The two-year Treasury yield rose about 13 basis points to 4.35%, its highest close since January 2025, while the 10-year finished near 4.72% and the 30-year at 5.21% — a sharp flattening that erased the post-July steepening. The dollar index closed at 99.67, up about 0.9% on the week and its best week in ten. Gold fell hard. The S&P 500 slipped 0.2% Friday to 7,711.76 but still gained 0.5% on the week; the Dow closed at 53,559.99 and the Nasdaq at 26,402.42.

The tension Friday’s report has to resolve is between the two halves of the Fed’s mandate. Warsh spent his keynote on inflation while the labor market has been quietly deteriorating underneath him — falling payrolls, a benchmark revision that just erased another 79,000 jobs, and a three-month average near 20,000. A central bank raising rates into negative payroll prints is taking a real risk with employment. A soft August number knocks the September odds back and takes the dollar with them, which is the friendlier outcome for U.S. export competitiveness heading into harvest. A firm number confirms Warsh’s framing and puts a floor under a dollar that just had its best week since June.

For agriculture the asymmetry is worth naming plainly. This grain rally is being carried by Black Sea war risk and biofuel policy, not by the macro. A soft jobs number is a mild tailwind through a weaker dollar; a firm one is a headwind arriving exactly as harvest selling begins and the carrying cost of grain in the bin starts to matter. Neither changes a balance sheet, but the dollar is the channel through which Friday reaches cash markets — and from there the sequence runs to the August CPI report on Sept. 11 and then to Sept. 16, which is where a wheat market asking the world to switch origins finds out how expensive that switch is going to be.

Two Fed voices break the silence in between. Governor Michael Barr speaks at 9:05 a.m. Tuesday on the economic outlook and financial inclusion, and Governor Christopher Waller gives a Reuters interview on the outlook at 8:30 a.m. Thursday — the same minute the trade balance and jobless claims print. The Beige Book, the last before the September meeting, lands at 2 p.m. Wednesday. Earnings are thinner than last week but not empty: Broadcom reports Wednesday after the close, and for agriculture the two to watch are Toro and Campbell’s, both Thursday before the open. Bank of Canada is expected to hold at 2.25% Wednesday, and Canada’s own employment report lands Friday alongside the U.S. number.

Agriculture: harvest arrives with the rally intact

Monday’s Crop Progress report at 4 p.m. is the first condition read of the week and comes with export inspections at 11 a.m. But the more consequential agricultural data this week is Tuesday afternoon, when USDA publishes grain crushings and oilseed crushings at 3 p.m. Those two reports arrive roughly 24 hours after EPA is due to decide how much biofuel demand exists, which makes them the first hard read on crush economics into the new marketing year. Soybean meal at $348.90 on December futures — its best level in more than two years — has been running on its own export demand, including 200,000 tonnes to Germany and the Netherlands announced Friday. Strong soybean oil values encourage crush, which builds meal supply; if Monday guts oil, that equation changes on a lag.

The Purdue and CME Group Ag Economy Barometer publishes Tuesday at 9:30 a.m., and it is unusually well timed. It is the first monthly read on producer sentiment to capture the beef import waiver, the border reopening, the Warsh speech and a grain rally that has taken December corn to a three-year high — a combination that pulls sentiment in opposite directions depending on what a producer sells.

The Farm Progress Show runs Tuesday through Thursday at Boone, Iowa, in its biennial Iowa edition. It is the largest gathering of Midwestern producers of the year, it is one of the nine venues USDA named for its Farmers First data-modernization listening tour, and it convenes 48 hours after the EPA and USDA announcements. Expect the administration to use it, and expect the farm organizations to use it back.

Midweek belongs to Beijing again, and the test is a clean one. Sinograin offers just 68,000 tonnes at Wednesday’s imported-soybean auction, bidding at 1:30 p.m. Beijing time — a 77% cut from the 290,794 tonnes offered Aug. 26 and barely 13% of the 516,613 tonnes listed Aug. 12. Across five completed auctions the state reserve manager has offered about 2.17 million tonnes and sold roughly 1.57 million, a cumulative clearance near 72%, with the clearance rate stepping down — 89.3%, then 85.2%, then 76.6% — even as the average price climbed from 4,023 yuan a tonne to 4,162.73. Falling clearance at rising prices is not the bearish signal the percentages alone suggest: buyers turned selective, not absent, and the last two sales cleared above a delivered, tax-paid U.S. import parity near $607.

The small size makes Wednesday a clean test. If Sinograin sells nearly all of 68,000 tonnes at or above 4,162.73 yuan, it argues Chinese commercial demand is firm and the slipping clearance rates were a function of quantity rather than appetite. If even an offer this small struggles, that is much stronger evidence crushers have covered nearby needs. Either way, cutting the offer this sharply suggests the warehouse-clearing campaign that ran alongside China’s heavy U.S. buying is close to finished — which removes a competing source of physical supply inside China just as the U.S. harvest arrives.

Thursday’s export sales report at 8:30 a.m. is the read on whether the Chinese buying held. USDA reported 2.478 million tonnes of new-crop soybean sales in the latest reporting week, with daily sales of 182,000 tonnes to China and 226,000 to unknown destinations announced Friday on top of 333,000 tonnes to China on Wednesday. Total 2026-27 corn commitments stand at 87.76 million tonnes against 70.47 million a year ago, sorghum at about 5.10 million against 1.80 million, and upland cotton at roughly 4.33 million running bales, 27% above last year.

Table 3. The agriculture calendar, Aug. 31 – Sept. 4. Note there is no WASDE this week; the September Crop Production report and WASDE arrive at noon ET Friday, Sept. 11. Sources: USDA NASS, AMS, ERS and FAS release calendars; China National Grain Trade Center; ABARES; FAO; CFTC; ICE; event organizers.

On wheat, the market that led everything, the week opens with a new variable. Turkey has intensified contacts with Moscow and Kyiv aimed at building a safe-navigation mechanism for commercial grain shipping in the Black Sea — effectively an attempt to recreate the function of the old Black Sea Grain Initiative. Ankara’s own exposure is driving it: Turkish grain officials say shipments from both Russia and Ukraine have effectively stopped, and Istanbul cereals association chairman Kazim Tayci says prices there are already up 4% to 4.5% and could rise more than 10% if the disruption runs another two months. Turkish industry estimates put roughly 100 million tonnes of grain and oilseeds — about 60 million from Russia and 30 million to 35 million from Ukraine — effectively blocked.

The distinction to hold onto is that this is not an agreement. There is no confirmed Russian or Ukrainian acceptance, no inspection mechanism, no corridor and no date; Russia rejected an earlier Turkish moratorium proposal this month. And the physical trend is still running the other way — Ukrainian authorities confirmed damage to transport infrastructure and fires involving eight food-carrying trucks at the Danube port of Izmail overnight Aug. 28-29. It is nonetheless the clearest bearish risk standing against a wheat market that just rose 12% in a week, and a credible agreement would take part of the transportation premium out quickly.

What is pushing Ankara is no longer abstract. Turkey’s Foreign Ministry says the Cameroon-flagged, Turkish-operated Lider Bordo Mavi was struck by three drones off Russia’s Tuapse coast on Aug. 26 while carrying fresh produce, catching fire and injuring five crew, and that the Lider Kocatepe — sent to tow her — was itself hit Aug. 27 and limped back to Samsun. Ankara summoned Ukrainian Ambassador Naryman Dzhelialov on Aug. 29 and told him lives, property, safety of navigation and the marine environment have to be protected. No one has claimed the strikes and public reporting does not establish responsibility for either one; Kyiv’s standing position is that it targets Russian logistics rather than civilian traffic. The relevant point for this market is not attribution. It is that the country brokering the corridor is now a casualty of its absence.

The bigger development for grain is a shift in the kind of problem the Black Sea presents. Until now it has been a price problem — higher freight, higher war-risk premiums, longer voyages. It is becoming a supply-of-ships problem. The Turkish Chamber of Shipping counts 22 Turkish merchant vessels targeted in the past two months and 34 Turkish-owned or Turkish-controlled vessels among 146 confirmed attacks since February 2022. Roughly 100 ships were sheltering in Black Sea ports, shipyards and anchorages as of Aug. 21, including 35 at the Samsun anchorage and 22 off Sinop. Chamber Chairman Tamer Kiran warns the situation risks damaging regional trade outright, and owners are weighing long-term cold lay-up — parking ships out of service to preserve them — for the first time in 18 years. The reasons the industry gives are insurance cost, inability to crew, port restrictions and plain attack risk: the voyages have stopped penciling.

The traffic numbers say the same thing from the other direction. Transbosphor Maritime Transportation Board Chairman Mustafa Can told Bloomberg HT on Aug. 25 that daily transits through the Turkish Straits have fallen from about 200 ships to 25 to 30, that Turkish exposure could reach $20 billion over three months, and that the roughly $700 million to $800 million Turkey earns annually in Straits transit fees is at risk. He called the strikes on commercial vessels a form of piracy. The Baltic Dry Index is up about 50% year to date.

A freight premium can be paid. A shortage of owners willing to sail cannot. If Turkish operators actually begin laying vessels up or declining Black Sea fixtures, the disruption becomes self-reinforcing — fewer ships, higher freight, higher war-risk cover and slower loadings — and it does so without a single additional terminal being hit. That is the mechanism to watch, and it is the one that would keep a transportation premium in wheat even if Ankara’s safe-navigation talks make progress.

Two cautions on the numbers. There is no reliable new quantified war-risk premium in the public record this week, so any specific percentage increase in insurance cost being quoted should be treated as an estimate rather than a print. And on the Ukrainian side nothing has verifiably cleared: the Sulina bottleneck still runs a 50- to 70-vessel queue at an effective two to three vessels a day, with delay costs near $8,000 per vessel per day. On the Russian side, Tuapse — the location of this week’s strikes — remains the only deep-water grain terminal in the Azov-Black Sea basin not formally shut, at roughly 160,000 tonnes a month of capacity, while Novorossiysk’s NKHP, NZT and KSK stay suspended. No reopening surfaced in this check.

Figure 7. The Black Sea risk is shifting from freight cost to vessel availability. Sources: Turkish Chamber of Shipping; Turkish Foreign Ministry; Transbosphor Maritime Transportation Board via Bloomberg HT, Aug. 25; Ag Policy & Markets Daily reporting.

Energy: a thin data week around a heavy conference calendar

The energy calendar has no Short-Term Energy Outlook — the next comes Sept. 9 — and no OPEC+ meeting, though the eight-country group convenes Sunday, Sept. 6, immediately after this week closes. What the week does have is the weekly data, an unusually dense international conference slate and the August tanker-tracking numbers.

Oil finished the week of Aug. 24-28 lower on both benchmarks, and the reason matters. Treasury’s Iran sanctions package landed Monday, Aug. 24 — “Operation Economic Outcast,” 77 designations covering 20 individuals, 51 entities and six vessels across digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping. No major Chinese bank was designated. The Chinese entities named were shipping, logistics, trading and technology firms. That was read as escalation short of the financial rupture the market had been positioned for, and Brent fell 2.56% that day to $91.97 and WTI 2.58% to $84.81. Brent closed the week near $88.29 and WTI near $83.44, with WTI down about 4% on the week. Henry Hub finished near $2.88, up about 5.8% on the month, with Lower-48 production at a record 111.4 billion cubic feet a day capping the rally and EIA reporting a modest 15 Bcf storage injection.

At the pump the picture has stabilized on gasoline and not on diesel. AAA’s national averages Saturday had regular gasoline at $4.081, down about two cents on the week but 88 cents above a year ago, and on-highway diesel at $5.605, up a penny on the week, 27 cents on the month and $1.90 on the year — a 51% annual increase. Diesel is the number that reaches farm country, and it is arriving three weeks before combines roll.

Bloomberg publishes the bulk of its crude and condensate tanker trackers for August early in the week, with the OPEC production survey for the month following later — the first hard read on how much Iranian crude actually moved in August, against reporting that Chinese imports of Iranian crude fell from 823,000 barrels a day in July to an estimated 534,000 in August. The conference calendar is heavy and geographically pointed: Middle East Energy 2026 and Energy Trading Week Middle East both run in Dubai through Sept. 3, Oil and Gas Asia opens in Kuala Lumpur Wednesday, Rystad Energy’s APAC Summit meets in Singapore Thursday, and Russia hosts the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok through Friday. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit convenes in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan on Monday, and G20 finance ministers and central bank governors meet in Asheville, North Carolina for two days beginning Monday.

Table 4. The energy calendar, Aug. 31 – Sept. 4. No Short-Term Energy Outlook this week; the next is Sept. 9, and the eight-country OPEC+ group meets Sunday, Sept. 6. Sources: EIA, API, Baker Hughes, CFTC, ICE, Bloomberg, event organizers.

Trade: Canada’s list is out, and ethanol is not on it

The single largest question hanging over agriculture from the U.S./Canada rupture has been answered, and the answer is favorable. Finance Canada published its counter-tariff schedule Aug. 25: roughly C$27.6 billion of U.S. goods, about 700 products, at rates of 15%, 25% and 50% set to mirror the U.S. rate on the identical good, effective 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 8. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne framed it plainly: “When the United States asked too much and offered too little, we chose to stand up for Canadians.” An accompanying C$7.5 billion package supports affected workers and businesses.

Figure 8. What Canada’s Sept. 8 schedule reaches and what it leaves alone. Sources: Finance Canada; Ag Policy & Markets Daily analysis of the published schedule.

Ethanol is not on the list. That was the line this newsletter flagged as the one to search for when the schedule posted, because Canada takes roughly 35% of all U.S. ethanol exports and there is no realistic substitute market for that volume. HS 2207 does not appear. Corn, soybeans, wheat, beef, pork, poultry, eggs, fluid milk, butter and fresh produce are all absent as well.

Dairy is the real agricultural hit. Milk and cream powders, whey, casein and milk albumin draw 50%; cheese draws 25%. Seafood is at 25%, and natural honey, molasses and bakery mixes and doughs at 50%. The second thing worth correcting is the machinery headline. Ottawa named “agricultural equipment” among its target sectors, and the published schedule reaches powered rotary lawn mowers at 25%, other mowers and parts at 15%, and livestock trailers at 25% — but not tractors, combines, planters, tillage equipment or sprayers. The footprint is far narrower than the announcement implied.

Read the schedule as calibrated rather than maximal. Ottawa had the option of reaching bulk commodities and fuel ethanol and did not take it, which leaves room to escalate later and preserves the possibility of a stand-down before Sept. 8. Talks remain suspended, no meeting is scheduled, and the 50% U.S. Section 338 tariffs — the first modern use of that authority — remain in force on about $20 billion of Canadian goods with energy, potash and critical minerals carved out. No legal challenge has been filed, though the Liberty Justice Center is looking for plaintiffs and trade lawyers note the provision has never been litigated.

China: no round on the calendar, and a summit Beijing has not confirmed

Xi Jinping is due in Washington on Sept. 24, three weeks after this week closes, and the honest answer on preparation is that there is no announced negotiating round between now and then. The last principal-level engagement was a video call of more than an hour on July 30 between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, USTR Jamieson Greer and Vice Premier He Lifeng. Bessent’s readout: “I emphasized that we expect Beijing to fully meet its commitments on rare earths and U.S. agricultural products.” Beijing’s described the exchange as “candid, in-depth, and constructive” while registering “serious concern” over recent U.S. economic restrictions. No follow-up date or host city was announced, and none has been since.

That absence is less alarming than it sounds, because this channel has consistently announced itself late. The seven rounds since May 2025 — Geneva, London, Stockholm, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, Paris in March and Seoul in May — have several times been confirmed only three to five days ahead. The Seoul round convened two days before the president’s Beijing state visit. A round materializing in the week of Sept. 14 would fit the pattern exactly. It is simply not on any calendar today.

What is on the calendar this week is a venue rather than a negotiation. G20 finance ministers and central bank governors meet in Asheville, North Carolina on Monday and Tuesday, hosted by Bessent and co-hosted by Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh, with deputies meeting over the weekend. China normally sends Finance Minister Lan Fo’an and People’s Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng. Neither Treasury’s announcement nor the preview reporting names the Chinese delegation or confirms a bilateral, so treat any Bessent meeting with Chinese counterparts in Asheville as plausible and unreported rather than scheduled. The U.S. agenda there is growth, trade imbalances and excess capacity — language aimed at Beijing — plus Iran sanctions compliance, which Treasury says it will raise in every bilateral.

Diplomatically the groundwork is visible. Secretary of State Marco Rubio met Foreign Minister Wang Yi for about 90 minutes in Manila on July 22 on the margins of the ASEAN foreign ministers’ meeting, explicitly to prepare the visit; both sides called it pragmatic and constructive. On Wednesday, Aug. 26, Wang met U.S. Ambassador David Perdue in Beijing and urged Washington to “focus on the positive agenda, properly manage differences, remove interference and overcome obstacles” to high-level exchanges — diplomatic language that is not usually deployed when preparations are going smoothly. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), a recurring backchannel, has been reported as returning to Beijing to help lock in the summit agenda, with no dates disclosed.

One thing worth stating plainly: Beijing has never officially confirmed Sept. 24. The date comes from the president, who announced it July 23. China’s foreign ministry says only that the two sides are in communication about a leaders’ meeting “within the year,” and Xinhua’s Aug. 28 announcement of Xi’s travel — Bishkek for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit Aug. 30 to Sept. 3, plus Kyrgyzstan and Egypt — says nothing about Washington. The summit was already postponed once this year, from March to May, by the Iran war.

The institutional channel created in May is running at two speeds. The Board of Trade is advancing: USTR opened a comment docket June 2 that closed July 10, seeking views on cutting tariffs back to most-favored-nation rates on roughly $30 billion of goods in each direction, with agriculture and aviation identified by both sides as priority sectors. Rubio said in July that it could be operational before the summit and called it “one of the potential concrete deliverables that we can have before September.” The Board of Investment has stalled; the U.S./China Business Council’s Sean Stein said he is “not seeing evidence yet that that’s going to be a sizeable deliverable.” No inaugural Board of Trade meeting has been reported as held or scheduled.

Cutting the other way, Bloomberg reported Aug. 24 that the administration is preparing a 7.5% overcapacity tariff on Chinese goods, drawn from a separate excess-capacity investigation and intended to land before the summit. That would sit on top of the 12.5% forced-labor Section 301 action applied to China on July 23. Preparing new tariffs three weeks before a state visit is either leverage or friction depending on how Beijing reads it, and it is the kind of move that has delayed this meeting before.

For agriculture the scoreboard is the thing to watch. USDA trade undersecretary Luke Lindberg said on July 22 that China is “slightly behind” but “on pace,” and that “they should hit $11.8 billion at the end of the year” — with accountability tied explicitly to the September leadership meetings. StoneX’s Arlan Suderman estimates the current buying pace puts China at 50% to 60% of the 25-million-tonne soybean target by late September, ahead of Beijing’s own internal plan of 15 million tonnes by Dec. 31. Total commitments are approaching 10 million tonnes and the basis is firm, with buyers paying about $3.03 a bushel over November futures for Gulf shipment and $3.00 for the Pacific Northwest.

Two dates belong on the fall calendar behind the summit. The Section 301 exclusions covering 178 products expire at 11:59 p.m. ET Nov. 9, with entries from Nov. 10 paying underlying List 1 through 4A rates of 7.5% to 25%; the one-year suspensions of China’s retaliatory measures and of the U.S. affiliate end-user rule run from the same date. China’s market-based tariff exclusion process runs to Dec. 31. Both cliffs land immediately after the calendar-2026 purchase year closes, which is what gives a September summit its deadline quality.

Iran: the round that spared the banks

The Iran sanctions package that landed Monday, Aug. 24 mattered to agriculture mostly for what it did not do. Treasury designated 77 targets — 20 individuals, 51 entities and six vessels — across digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping under what Bessent has branded Operation Economic Outcast, a secondary-sanctions regime that can cut foreign firms off from the U.S. financial system for Iran-related business. The Chinese names on the list were shipping, logistics, trading and technology firms. No major Chinese bank was designated. A further round of Iran-related designations followed Aug. 28.

That restraint is being read as deliberate protection of the Sept. 24 summit, and the market read it the same way: Brent fell 2.56% on the day of the announcement to $91.97 and WTI 2.58% to $84.81, unwinding a risk premium that had been positioned for a financial rupture. Chinese imports of Iranian crude are reported down from 823,000 barrels a day in July to an estimated 534,000 in August, so the pressure is working through volumes rather than through the banking system. For soybeans, the absence of a bank designation is the whole story — it keeps the purchase program and the summit on the same track.

Week at a glance

Figure 9. The week’s calendar at a glance. Sources: USDA, BLS, BEA, Census Bureau, EIA, Federal Reserve, EPA, Office of the Majority Leader, event organizers, company announcements.

Table 5. Friday settlements and weekly changes, week ended Aug. 28, 2026. Source: CME Group.

What to watch first

First, Monday, and specifically the EPA reallocation percentage. The headline RIN number in EPA’s exemption package will move soybean oil in the first minute, but what determines the durable damage is how much of the exempted volume gets reallocated to everyone else and whether the reported 500 million gallons for 2027 is written in a way anyone can enforce. A large package with full reallocation is survivable. A large package with 70% and a promise is the Wimpy plan, and the trade will price it as one.

Second, Tuesday evening, and the two-thirds. If the House clears H.R. 6500 under suspension, a pre-election shutdown comes off the board and the September calendar gets meaningfully easier for everything else — including a farm bill that needs floor time it does not have. If it falls short, the fight moves into a three-week window after Sept. 14 with the fiscal year expiring inside it.

Third, Friday at 8:30 a.m. ET. Payrolls somewhere between +45,000 and +58,000 with unemployment ticking to 4.2% would be soft enough to keep the argument alive without settling it. A print near Wells Fargo’s +80,000, or any acceleration in average hourly earnings, hardens the September odds and puts a floor under the dollar just as harvest selling begins. Watch the revisions as closely as the headline — they have been the story for three months running.

And underneath all of it, the Wednesday auction in Beijing. Sixty-eight thousand tonnes is a small number that answers a large question about whether Chinese crushers still have room and appetite for the U.S. cargoes the Sept. 24 summit is supposed to keep flowing.

Bottom line

Congress gets four days and one real chance to take a shutdown off the table. The House takes up the Senate’s stopgap Tuesday under a two-thirds threshold that leaves no room for amendments, because the chamber that would have to agree to them is not in town. Pass it and the fall calendar clears somewhat. Fall short and the Sept. 30 deadline moves into a window with the farm bill, the NDAA, crypto market structure and a reconciliation package that may already have slipped past the election.

But the decisions that will actually move prices this week are not congressional at all. EPA settles how much biofuel demand exists for a soybean crop three weeks from harvest, and the reallocation percentage matters more than the headline. USDA opens a campaign on meatpacker concentration whose achievable parts are real but slow, landing on a cattle market that just lost $6 on the week to a proclamation that publishes the same morning and sends its first 100,000 tonnes of Brazilian and Paraguayan trimmings through the door Tuesday.

Then the week hands off to a jobs report. Warsh has told the market the Fed has work to do on inflation; the labor data have spent three months saying something else, and Friday is where that argument either gets resolved or gets sharper. A grain complex carrying a 12% weekly wheat rally, a corn contract high and a Chinese soybean program it cannot fully verify will trade the answer through the dollar.

The good news for anyone selling grain is that none of this changed a balance sheet. The risk is that all of it changed the price of carrying one.

AG POLICY & MARKETS DAILY   |   WEEK AHEAD  |  AGRICULTURE, TRADE, ENERGY AND THE ECONOMY — SATURDAY, AUGUST 29, 2026